7 lines
23 KiB
JSON
7 lines
23 KiB
JSON
{"type":"session","version":3,"id":"019f9040-5919-727f-b8ec-418a0aa8b20c","timestamp":"2026-07-23T18:32:44.057Z","cwd":"/home/liph","parentSession":"/home/liph/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph--/2026-07-23T18-25-35-096Z_019f9039-cd78-745f-91f1-bb6dd3cf77e6.jsonl"}
|
|
{"type":"model_change","id":"8d0dba4c","parentId":null,"timestamp":"2026-07-23T18:25:48.326Z","provider":"ollama","modelId":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud"}
|
|
{"type":"thinking_level_change","id":"571e834e","parentId":"8d0dba4c","timestamp":"2026-07-23T18:25:48.326Z","thinkingLevel":"medium"}
|
|
{"type":"custom_message","customType":"subagent-slash-result","content":"Step 1: Stages\n1. **scout** — `subagent scout` with `output: context.md`, `context: fresh`, `async: true`. Map the relevant code, list the files to touch, capture conventions.\n2. **ollama-planner** — reads `context.md`, writes `plan.md`. `context: fork`, `async: true`.\n3. **ollama-coder** — reads `plan.md`, implements, runs validation. `context: fork`, `async: true`, `defaultContext: fork`.\n4. **parallel review** — three `ollama-reviewer` instances with distinct angles (correctness, tests/validation, simplicity/security). `context: fresh`, `concurrency: 3`, `async: true`.\n5. **synthesize** — parent reads the three reviews, applies `worth fixing now` items via one more `ollama-coder` run (or manually), then summarizes for the user.\n\nStep 2: When to use\n- A new feature spanning 2+ files.\n- A non-trivial bug fix touching multiple components.\n- A refactor with a clear target shape.\n\nStep 3: When NOT to use\n- Single-line fixes → just edit directly.\n- Pure research questions → use `research-brief` instead.\n- Changes that need user clarification first → ask the user, then start the chain.\n\nStep 4: Inputs\nThe chain task should include: the feature request, the target repo path, any constraints (must keep API stable, must not touch X, must add tests), and any attached screenshots.\n\nStep 5: Validation contract (set before launching)\nBefore stage 3, write down in the task prompt:\n- expected behavior after the change\n- tests or commands the coder must run\n- evidence the coder must return (changed files, command output, screenshots)\n\nStep 6: Stop rules\n- If `scout` finds the task is out of scope or the codebase is in an unexpected state, stop and ask the user.\n- If `ollama-planner` surfaces ambiguity in \"Open Questions\", stop and ask the user before launching the coder.\n- If a reviewer reports a `blocker` or an unapproved decision, stop and ask the user.\n- If a `worth fixing now` item is small and safe, parent applies it directly; if it touches product/architecture, ask the user first.","display":true,"details":{"requestId":"05354ebe-0cb0-4fa0-9319-891d1bf5cbd6","result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Step 1: Stages\n1. **scout** — `subagent scout` with `output: context.md`, `context: fresh`, `async: true`. Map the relevant code, list the files to touch, capture conventions.\n2. **ollama-planner** — reads `context.md`, writes `plan.md`. `context: fork`, `async: true`.\n3. **ollama-coder** — reads `plan.md`, implements, runs validation. `context: fork`, `async: true`, `defaultContext: fork`.\n4. **parallel review** — three `ollama-reviewer` instances with distinct angles (correctness, tests/validation, simplicity/security). `context: fresh`, `concurrency: 3`, `async: true`.\n5. **synthesize** — parent reads the three reviews, applies `worth fixing now` items via one more `ollama-coder` run (or manually), then summarizes for the user.\n\nStep 2: When to use\n- A new feature spanning 2+ files.\n- A non-trivial bug fix touching multiple components.\n- A refactor with a clear target shape.\n\nStep 3: When NOT to use\n- Single-line fixes → just edit directly.\n- Pure research questions → use `research-brief` instead.\n- Changes that need user clarification first → ask the user, then start the chain.\n\nStep 4: Inputs\nThe chain task should include: the feature request, the target repo path, any constraints (must keep API stable, must not touch X, must add tests), and any attached screenshots.\n\nStep 5: Validation contract (set before launching)\nBefore stage 3, write down in the task prompt:\n- expected behavior after the change\n- tests or commands the coder must run\n- evidence the coder must return (changed files, command output, screenshots)\n\nStep 6: Stop rules\n- If `scout` finds the task is out of scope or the codebase is in an unexpected state, stop and ask the user.\n- If `ollama-planner` surfaces ambiguity in \"Open Questions\", stop and ask the user before launching the coder.\n- If a reviewer reports a `blocker` or an unapproved decision, stop and ask the user.\n- If a `worth fixing now` item is small and safe, parent applies it directly; if it touches product/architecture, ask the user first."}],"details":{"mode":"chain","results":[{"agent":"Stages","task":"1. **scout** — `subagent scout` with `output: context.md`, `context: fresh`, `async: true`. Map the relevant code, list the files to touch, capture conventions.\n2. **ollama-planner** — reads `context.md`, writes `plan.md`. `context: fork`, `async: true`.\n3. **ollama-coder** — reads `plan.md`, implements, runs validation. `context: fork`, `async: true`, `defaultContext: fork`.\n4. **parallel review** — three `ollama-reviewer` instances with distinct angles (correctness, tests/validation, simplicity/security). `context: fresh`, `concurrency: 3`, `async: true`.\n5. **synthesize** — parent reads the three reviews, applies `worth fixing now` items via one more `ollama-coder` run (or manually), then summarizes for the user.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":0,"agent":"Stages","status":"running","task":"1. **scout** — `subagent scout` with `output: context.md`, `context: fresh`, `async: true`. Map the relevant code, list the files to touch, capture conventions.\n2. **ollama-planner** — reads `context.md`, writes `plan.md`. `context: fork`, `async: true`.\n3. **ollama-coder** — reads `plan.md`, implements, runs validation. `context: fork`, `async: true`, `defaultContext: fork`.\n4. **parallel review** — three `ollama-reviewer` instances with distinct angles (correctness, tests/validation, simplicity/security). `context: fresh`, `concurrency: 3`, `async: true`.\n5. **synthesize** — parent reads the three reviews, applies `worth fixing now` items via one more `ollama-coder` run (or manually), then summarizes for the user.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"When to use","task":"- A new feature spanning 2+ files.\n- A non-trivial bug fix touching multiple components.\n- A refactor with a clear target shape.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":1,"agent":"When to use","status":"pending","task":"- A new feature spanning 2+ files.\n- A non-trivial bug fix touching multiple components.\n- A refactor with a clear target shape.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"When NOT to use","task":"- Single-line fixes → just edit directly.\n- Pure research questions → use `research-brief` instead.\n- Changes that need user clarification first → ask the user, then start the chain.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":2,"agent":"When NOT to use","status":"pending","task":"- Single-line fixes → just edit directly.\n- Pure research questions → use `research-brief` instead.\n- Changes that need user clarification first → ask the user, then start the chain.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"Inputs","task":"The chain task should include: the feature request, the target repo path, any constraints (must keep API stable, must not touch X, must add tests), and any attached screenshots.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":3,"agent":"Inputs","status":"pending","task":"The chain task should include: the feature request, the target repo path, any constraints (must keep API stable, must not touch X, must add tests), and any attached screenshots.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"Validation contract (set before launching)","task":"Before stage 3, write down in the task prompt:\n- expected behavior after the change\n- tests or commands the coder must run\n- evidence the coder must return (changed files, command output, screenshots)","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":4,"agent":"Validation contract (set before launching)","status":"pending","task":"Before stage 3, write down in the task prompt:\n- expected behavior after the change\n- tests or commands the coder must run\n- evidence the coder must return (changed files, command output, screenshots)","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"Stop rules","task":"- If `scout` finds the task is out of scope or the codebase is in an unexpected state, stop and ask the user.\n- If `ollama-planner` surfaces ambiguity in \"Open Questions\", stop and ask the user before launching the coder.\n- If a reviewer reports a `blocker` or an unapproved decision, stop and ask the user.\n- If a `worth fixing now` item is small and safe, parent applies it directly; if it touches product/architecture, ask the user first.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":5,"agent":"Stop rules","status":"pending","task":"- If `scout` finds the task is out of scope or the codebase is in an unexpected state, stop and ask the user.\n- If `ollama-planner` surfaces ambiguity in \"Open Questions\", stop and ask the user before launching the coder.\n- If a reviewer reports a `blocker` or an unapproved decision, stop and ask the user.\n- If a `worth fixing now` item is small and safe, parent applies it directly; if it touches product/architecture, ask the user first.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}}],"progress":[{"index":0,"agent":"Stages","status":"running","task":"1. **scout** — `subagent scout` with `output: context.md`, `context: fresh`, `async: true`. Map the relevant code, list the files to touch, capture conventions.\n2. **ollama-planner** — reads `context.md`, writes `plan.md`. `context: fork`, `async: true`.\n3. **ollama-coder** — reads `plan.md`, implements, runs validation. `context: fork`, `async: true`, `defaultContext: fork`.\n4. **parallel review** — three `ollama-reviewer` instances with distinct angles (correctness, tests/validation, simplicity/security). `context: fresh`, `concurrency: 3`, `async: true`.\n5. **synthesize** — parent reads the three reviews, applies `worth fixing now` items via one more `ollama-coder` run (or manually), then summarizes for the user.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":1,"agent":"When to use","status":"pending","task":"- A new feature spanning 2+ files.\n- A non-trivial bug fix touching multiple components.\n- A refactor with a clear target shape.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":2,"agent":"When NOT to use","status":"pending","task":"- Single-line fixes → just edit directly.\n- Pure research questions → use `research-brief` instead.\n- Changes that need user clarification first → ask the user, then start the chain.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":3,"agent":"Inputs","status":"pending","task":"The chain task should include: the feature request, the target repo path, any constraints (must keep API stable, must not touch X, must add tests), and any attached screenshots.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":4,"agent":"Validation contract (set before launching)","status":"pending","task":"Before stage 3, write down in the task prompt:\n- expected behavior after the change\n- tests or commands the coder must run\n- evidence the coder must return (changed files, command output, screenshots)","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":5,"agent":"Stop rules","status":"pending","task":"- If `scout` finds the task is out of scope or the codebase is in an unexpected state, stop and ask the user.\n- If `ollama-planner` surfaces ambiguity in \"Open Questions\", stop and ask the user before launching the coder.\n- If a reviewer reports a `blocker` or an unapproved decision, stop and ask the user.\n- If a `worth fixing now` item is small and safe, parent applies it directly; if it touches product/architecture, ask the user first.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}],"chainAgents":["Stages","When to use","When NOT to use","Inputs","Validation contract (set before launching)","Stop rules"],"totalSteps":6,"currentStepIndex":0}}},"id":"29e5fa60","parentId":"571e834e","timestamp":"2026-07-23T18:26:03.740Z"}
|
|
{"type":"custom_message","customType":"subagent-slash-result","content":"## Subagent result\n\nUnknown agent: Stages (step 1)","display":false,"details":{"requestId":"05354ebe-0cb0-4fa0-9319-891d1bf5cbd6","result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Unknown agent: Stages (step 1)"}],"isError":true,"details":{"mode":"chain","results":[]}}},"id":"1e6a7453","parentId":"29e5fa60","timestamp":"2026-07-23T18:26:03.753Z"}
|
|
{"type":"custom_message","customType":"subagent-slash-result","content":"Step 1: scout\nMap the relevant code for {task}. List files to touch, capture conventions, identify risks, and write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 2: ollama-planner\nRead {reads} and create a concrete implementation plan for {task}. Write ordered tasks with file paths, acceptance criteria, and risks to {output}.\n\nStep 3: ollama-coder\nExecute the plan from {reads}. Implement the smallest correct changes, run validation, and report changed files with evidence to {output}.\n\nStep 4: reviewer\nReview the implementation against the plan. Focus on: correctness, regressions, edge cases, and whether the change does what it claims. Write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 5: reviewer\nReview test coverage and validation. Focus on: tests added/updated, do they exercise the new code, are they sufficient to catch regressions. Write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 6: reviewer\nReview for simplicity, maintainability, and security. Focus on: smallest correct change, readability, naming consistency, input validation, secrets, injection risks. Write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 7: worker\nSynthesize the three reviews from {reads}. Apply fixes worth doing now (small, safe changes). Report: what was fixed, what was deferred, and any blockers that need user decision.","display":true,"details":{"requestId":"6011ae5d-8076-4249-8614-d9b9aa4a27e3","result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Step 1: scout\nMap the relevant code for {task}. List files to touch, capture conventions, identify risks, and write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 2: ollama-planner\nRead {reads} and create a concrete implementation plan for {task}. Write ordered tasks with file paths, acceptance criteria, and risks to {output}.\n\nStep 3: ollama-coder\nExecute the plan from {reads}. Implement the smallest correct changes, run validation, and report changed files with evidence to {output}.\n\nStep 4: reviewer\nReview the implementation against the plan. Focus on: correctness, regressions, edge cases, and whether the change does what it claims. Write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 5: reviewer\nReview test coverage and validation. Focus on: tests added/updated, do they exercise the new code, are they sufficient to catch regressions. Write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 6: reviewer\nReview for simplicity, maintainability, and security. Focus on: smallest correct change, readability, naming consistency, input validation, secrets, injection risks. Write findings to {output}.\n\nStep 7: worker\nSynthesize the three reviews from {reads}. Apply fixes worth doing now (small, safe changes). Report: what was fixed, what was deferred, and any blockers that need user decision."}],"details":{"mode":"chain","results":[{"agent":"scout","task":"Map the relevant code for {task}. List files to touch, capture conventions, identify risks, and write findings to {output}.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":0,"agent":"scout","status":"running","task":"Map the relevant code for {task}. List files to touch, capture conventions, identify risks, and write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"ollama-planner","task":"Read {reads} and create a concrete implementation plan for {task}. Write ordered tasks with file paths, acceptance criteria, and risks to {output}.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":1,"agent":"ollama-planner","status":"pending","task":"Read {reads} and create a concrete implementation plan for {task}. Write ordered tasks with file paths, acceptance criteria, and risks to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"ollama-coder","task":"Execute the plan from {reads}. Implement the smallest correct changes, run validation, and report changed files with evidence to {output}.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":2,"agent":"ollama-coder","status":"pending","task":"Execute the plan from {reads}. Implement the smallest correct changes, run validation, and report changed files with evidence to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"reviewer","task":"Review the implementation against the plan. Focus on: correctness, regressions, edge cases, and whether the change does what it claims. Write findings to {output}.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":3,"agent":"reviewer","status":"pending","task":"Review the implementation against the plan. Focus on: correctness, regressions, edge cases, and whether the change does what it claims. Write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"reviewer","task":"Review test coverage and validation. Focus on: tests added/updated, do they exercise the new code, are they sufficient to catch regressions. Write findings to {output}.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":4,"agent":"reviewer","status":"pending","task":"Review test coverage and validation. Focus on: tests added/updated, do they exercise the new code, are they sufficient to catch regressions. Write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"reviewer","task":"Review for simplicity, maintainability, and security. Focus on: smallest correct change, readability, naming consistency, input validation, secrets, injection risks. Write findings to {output}.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":5,"agent":"reviewer","status":"pending","task":"Review for simplicity, maintainability, and security. Focus on: smallest correct change, readability, naming consistency, input validation, secrets, injection risks. Write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}},{"agent":"worker","task":"Synthesize the three reviews from {reads}. Apply fixes worth doing now (small, safe changes). Report: what was fixed, what was deferred, and any blockers that need user decision.","exitCode":0,"messages":[],"usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0,"turns":0},"progress":{"index":6,"agent":"worker","status":"pending","task":"Synthesize the three reviews from {reads}. Apply fixes worth doing now (small, safe changes). Report: what was fixed, what was deferred, and any blockers that need user decision.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}}],"progress":[{"index":0,"agent":"scout","status":"running","task":"Map the relevant code for {task}. List files to touch, capture conventions, identify risks, and write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":1,"agent":"ollama-planner","status":"pending","task":"Read {reads} and create a concrete implementation plan for {task}. Write ordered tasks with file paths, acceptance criteria, and risks to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":2,"agent":"ollama-coder","status":"pending","task":"Execute the plan from {reads}. Implement the smallest correct changes, run validation, and report changed files with evidence to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":3,"agent":"reviewer","status":"pending","task":"Review the implementation against the plan. Focus on: correctness, regressions, edge cases, and whether the change does what it claims. Write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":4,"agent":"reviewer","status":"pending","task":"Review test coverage and validation. Focus on: tests added/updated, do they exercise the new code, are they sufficient to catch regressions. Write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":5,"agent":"reviewer","status":"pending","task":"Review for simplicity, maintainability, and security. Focus on: smallest correct change, readability, naming consistency, input validation, secrets, injection risks. Write findings to {output}.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0},{"index":6,"agent":"worker","status":"pending","task":"Synthesize the three reviews from {reads}. Apply fixes worth doing now (small, safe changes). Report: what was fixed, what was deferred, and any blockers that need user decision.","recentTools":[],"recentOutput":[],"toolCount":0,"tokens":0,"durationMs":0}],"chainAgents":["scout","ollama-planner","ollama-coder","reviewer","reviewer","reviewer","worker"],"totalSteps":7,"currentStepIndex":0}}},"id":"9d1de31e","parentId":"1e6a7453","timestamp":"2026-07-23T18:32:44.042Z"}
|