type: message

role: user

type: text

text: can


role: assistant

type: thinking

thinking:
The user just typed "can" which is an incomplete sentence/question. They might be asking "can you..." or "can I..." or something similar. Since it's incomplete, I should ask them to clarify what they'd like to know or do.

Given the context-mode is active and we're in implement mode, they might be asking about capabilities. I should respond helpfully asking for clarification while being ready to assist with whatever they need.

thinkingSignature: reasoning

text:
I'm here and ready to help! It looks like your message got cut off at "can" — what would you like to know or do?

A few possibilities based on the active context:

- **Can you help me with a coding task?** → Yes! Read/edit files, run commands, analyze code, etc.
- **Can you check context-mode stats?** → I can run `ctx_stats` or `ctx_doctor` if needed.
- **Can we search the knowledge base?** → Use `ctx_search` to find indexed content.
- **Can you execute multiple commands?** → `ctx_batch_execute` is available for parallel research.

What were you going to ask?

api: openai-completions

provider: ollama

stopReason: stop


text: you


thinking:
The user's message is just "you" - seems like they might have been typing something and it got fragmented. The previous turn was "can" and now "you" - maybe they were trying to say "can you..." but the message got split.

Given the session state, context-mode is active. I should ask what they need help with, or wait for them to complete their thought. But looking at the pattern, this might be an accidental fragmented message. I should respond helpfully asking what they need.

Actually, looking more carefully - they might be typing a command that got split across multiple messages. I should just ask what they need help with and offer the available capabilities.

text:
I'm here! It looks like your message might have gotten fragmented ("can" → "you").

How can I help you today? I can:

- **Code**: read files, edit code, write new files, run commands
- **Research**: batch execute multiple commands, search the web, fetch and index pages
- **Analyze**: process large outputs with `ctx_execute`, search indexed knowledge with `ctx_search`
- **Debug**: run `ctx_doctor` or check `ctx_stats` for context-mode health

What were you going to ask?


text: check


thinking:
The user wants me to "check" something, and context-mode is active. Based on the context-mode status message, I should use the appropriate tools. Let me check what they might want me to check. The most common "check" requests when context-mode is active would be:

1. `ctx_stats` - check context mode stats/savings
2. `ctx_doctor` - check if context mode is healthy
3. Check the session state (but that's already provided)

Since they said "check" and context-mode is active, I should probably run `ctx_stats` and `ctx_doctor` to give them a comprehensive health/status check. But let me think about what "check" typically means in this context...

Actually, given the fragmented messages ("can" → "you" → "check"), they might be asking "can you check [something]". But without knowing what to check, `ctx_stats` and `ctx_doctor` are the safest defaults for a context-mode health/status check.

Let me run both `ctx_stats` and `ctx_doctor` to be helpful.

text: I'll run a context-mode health and stats check for you.

type: toolCall

stopReason: toolUse


role: toolResult

text:
context-mode  < 1 min  0 calls

No tool calls yet. Use batch_execute or execute to start saving tokens.

  All your work  ·  80 events captured across 2 projects  ·  26 conversations

  cost                          48   ██████████████████████████████
  Session intent                18   ███████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
  pi                             8   █████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
  sandbox                        6   ████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
  Skipped (1): Pi
  These adapters have DBs on disk but only test fixtures, dev skeletons,
  or detection probes — no real chat activity.

─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Your AI talks less, remembers more, costs less.
$0.00 this session  ·  $0.02 lifetime
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

v1.0.169


text:
context-mode doctor

[OK] Runtimes: 7/11 (64%) — javascript, shell, python, ruby, go, rust, perl
[WARN] Performance: NORMAL — install Bun for 3-5x speed boost
[OK] Storage sessions: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions (default)
[OK] Storage content: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/content (default)
[OK] Storage stats: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions (default)
[OK] Server test: PASS
[OK] FTS5 / SQLite: PASS — native module works
[OK] Hook support: Pi hooks are wired via the context-mode Pi extension (~/.pi/extensions/context-mode/), not via JSON-stdio.
[OK] Hook scripts: no direct .mjs script paths to verify
[OK] Version: v1.0.169


thinking:
The user just said "check" and I ran ctx_stats and ctx_doctor. The results show:
- ctx_stats: Very fresh session (< 1 min, 0 calls), but 80 events captured across 2 projects historically. Version v1.0.169.
- ctx_doctor: Mostly OK. 7/11 runtimes available. Warning about Bun for speed boost. Everything else passes.

I should present this clearly and ask what specifically they want me to check if this wasn't what they meant.

text:
Here's your context-mode status:

**Stats** (`ctx_stats`)
- Session: Fresh (< 1 min, 0 tool calls this session)
- Historical: 80 events across 2 projects, 26 conversations
- Lifetime cost: ~$0.02
- Version: v1.0.169

**Health Check** (`ctx_doctor`)
- ✅ Storage, FTS5/SQLite, hooks, server all PASS
- ✅ Runtimes: 7/11 available (JS, Shell, Python, Ruby, Go, Rust, Perl)
- ⚠ Performance: Install Bun for 3-5x speed boost

Everything looks healthy. Was there something specific you wanted me to check — files, logs, a process, or something else?


text: if


thinking: The user's messages are fragmented: "can" → "you" → "check" → "if". They seem to be asking "can you check if..." something. I need to prompt them to complete their thought so I can help them effectively.

text:
Your message seems to have gotten fragmented — looks like you were typing something like:

> "Can you check if **...**"

What were you going to ask? For example:

- Can you check if a **file exists**?
- Can you check if a **process is running**?
- Can you check if **context-mode is working** for a specific task?
- Can you check if **code compiles** or **tests pass**?
- Can you check if **something is in the knowledge base**?

Just finish the sentence and I'll help!


text: i


thinking:
The user's messages keep getting fragmented ("can", "you", "check", "if", "i"). Now there's a session compaction event injected by the system.

The user seems to be struggling to type a complete message. I should ask them clearly what they want, acknowledging the fragmentation, and offer help. The compaction note tells me session mode is "implement" and context-mode is active.

I should be patient and ask what they were trying to ask.

text:
It looks like your messages are getting cut into pieces. You typed:
- "can"
- "you"
- "check"
- "if"
- "i"

And then a system compaction event came through. Your session is in **implement mode** with context-mode fully active.

What were you trying to ask? For example:

- "Can you check if I **have the right files**?"
- "Can you check if I **need to upgrade** context-mode?"
- "Can you check if I **have errors** in my project?"
- "Can you check if **something is indexed**?"

Or if you'd prefer, just tell me what you're working on and I'll figure out what checks to run!


text: have


thinking:
Yes, the user has context-mode active! That's what they were trying to ask: "can you check if I have context-mode active"

The answer is: Yes, you do have context-mode active. The system just confirmed it in the compaction event. Let me give them a clear answer and ask what they'd like to do with it.

text:
**Yes, you do have context-mode active!** ✅

The system just confirmed it in the compaction event. Here's what's available:

| Tool | Use For |
|------|---------|
| `ctx_batch_execute` | Run multiple commands in parallel |
| `ctx_execute` | Process large outputs without burning context |
| `ctx_execute_file` | Analyze files without reading them into memory |
| `ctx_search` | Query indexed knowledge base |
| `ctx_fetch_and_index` | Cache web pages for later search |
| `ctx_index` | Index local docs/files |
| `ctx_stats` | Check token savings |
| `ctx_doctor` | Run diagnostics |
| `ctx_upgrade` | Update to latest version |

Your stats from earlier show it's working — 80 historical events indexed, ~$0.02 lifetime cost, v1.0.169.

**What would you like to do with it?** For example:
- Index some documentation?
- Run a batch of commands?
- Search something in your knowledge base?


text: orphaned


thinking:
The user's message "orphaned" got fragmented across multiple turns, and now there's a compaction event confirming context-mode is active. It seems like they were trying to ask something like "Can you check if I have orphaned [something]?"

Given the context of context-mode and the word "orphaned", they might be asking about:
1. Orphaned processes
2. Orphaned files
3. Orphaned index entries in context-mode
4. Orphaned sessions

Let me search the knowledge base for "orphaned" to see if there's any prior context, and also check if there are any orphaned context-mode sessions or files.

text: I see "orphaned" — were you asking about **orphaned context-mode sessions**, **orphaned files/processes**, or something else? Let me check:

queries:
orphaned sessions
orphaned processes
orphaned files
orphaned index

sort: timeline

bash

command: ls -la /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/ 2>/dev/null | head -20


text:
## orphaned sessions
No results found.

---

## orphaned processes
No results found.

---

## orphaned files
No results found.

---

## orphaned index
No results found.

> Throttle: call #1/8 in this window. 2 call(s) before soft cap. Prefer ctx_search(queries: [...]) array form for multi-query workloads — it counts as a single call.


toolName: bash

text:
total 496
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph    954 Jul  4 12:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph     30 Jul  4 00:20 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  53248 Jul  4 12:35 2cc974af6afc822c.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  32768 Jul  4 12:35 2cc974af6afc822c.db-shm
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 173072 Jul  4 12:35 2cc974af6afc822c.db-wal
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  53248 Jul  3 23:55 590c1894467d14ef.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  32768 Jul  4 12:34 590c1894467d14ef.db-shm
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph      0 Jul  4 00:06 590c1894467d14ef.db-wal
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  69632 Jul  4 00:22 aa673b1056f331f7.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  32768 Jul  4 12:34 aa673b1056f331f7.db-shm
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph      0 Jul  4 12:33 aa673b1056f331f7.db-wal
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    386 Jul  3 23:49 stats-pid-1374687.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    385 Jul  4 00:06 stats-pid-1462008.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    390 Jul  4 00:08 stats-pid-1464359.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    389 Jul  4 00:09 stats-pid-1466317.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    389 Jul  4 00:09 stats-pid-1467504.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    389 Jul  4 00:10 stats-pid-1468533.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    390 Jul  4 00:10 stats-pid-1469564.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph    389 Jul  4 00:14 stats-pid-1475152.json


thinking:
The user seems to be asking about "orphaned" something. I see there are multiple session DBs in the context-mode sessions directory, and some stats-pid files. Let me check if any of these look orphaned (stale, not matching current processes, etc.).

Actually, looking at the stats-pid files, there are many of them from different PIDs. These might be orphaned stats files. Let me check if those PIDs are still alive, and also check the content directory for orphaned files.

Also, I notice there are 3 session DBs. Some might be old/orphaned. Let me investigate more.

text: I see some potentially orphaned items. Let me dig deeper:

command:
# Check if stats-pid files belong to alive processes
for f in /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-*.json; do
  pid=$(basename "$f" | sed 's/stats-pid-\(.*\)\.json/\1/')
  if ! kill -0 "$pid" 2>/dev/null; then
    echo "ORPHANED: $f (PID $pid not running)"
  else
    echo "ACTIVE: $f (PID $pid running)"
  fi
done

command:
# Check content directory for orphaned files
ls -la /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/content/ 2>/dev/null | head -30


text:
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1374687.json (PID 1374687 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1462008.json (PID 1462008 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1464359.json (PID 1464359 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1466317.json (PID 1466317 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1467504.json (PID 1467504 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1468533.json (PID 1468533 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1469564.json (PID 1469564 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1475152.json (PID 1475152 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1479267.json (PID 1479267 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1481856.json (PID 1481856 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1488412.json (PID 1488412 not running)
ORPHANED: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-36740.json (PID 36740 not running)
ACTIVE: /home/liph/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-39264.json (PID 39264 running)


text:
total 364
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph    168 Jul  4 12:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph     30 Jul  4 00:20 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   4096 Jul  4 12:34 2cc974af6afc822c.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  32768 Jul  4 12:34 2cc974af6afc822c.db-shm
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  82432 Jul  4 12:34 2cc974af6afc822c.db-wal
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 245760 Jul  4 00:20 aa673b1056f331f7.db


thinking:
The user seems to be asking about orphaned items. I found:
1. 12 orphaned stats-pid JSON files (PIDs not running)
2. 1 active stats-pid file
3. 3 session DBs in sessions directory, 2 of which are also mirrored in content directory

I should present this clearly and ask if they want me to clean up the orphaned files. Let me also check if the older session DBs might be orphaned by checking their modification times.

text:
**Yes, you have orphaned context-mode files!** Here's what I found:

### Orphaned `stats-pid-*.json` files
**12 orphaned** stats files in `~/.pi/context-mode/sessions/` — their processes are dead:
```
stats-pid-1374687.json through stats-pid-36740.json
```

**1 active**: `stats-pid-39264.json` (current session)

### Session DBs
You have **3 session databases** in `sessions/`:
- `2cc974af6afc822c.db` — currently active (Jul 4 12:35)
- `590c1894467d14ef.db` — older (Jul 3 23:55, 0 WAL size)
- `aa673b1056f331f7.db` — older (Jul 4 00:22, 0 WAL size)

And **2 content DBs** in `content/`:
- `2cc974af6afc822c.db` — current
- `aa673b1056f331f7.db` — older

---

**Want me to clean up the orphaned stats files?** Or were you asking about something else orphaned (processes, git branches, node_modules, etc.)?


text: packeges


thinking:
The user is asking about "orphaned packages" (with a typo: "packeges"). They want to check for orphaned packages in their system. Let me use a combination of tools to check for orphaned packages. Depending on the distro, this could be different commands. Let me check what distro they're on and then run appropriate commands.

Actually, looking at the context, the user has been sending fragmented messages:
- "can"
- "you"
- "check"
- "if"
- "i"
- "have"
- "orphaned"
- "packeges"

So the full question is: "Can you check if I have orphaned packages?"

I'll check the system for orphaned packages. Since this is a Linux system, I should figure out the package manager and then run the appropriate command.

text: Got it — **"Can you check if I have orphaned packages?"** Let me check your system:

command: cat /etc/os-release 2>/dev/null | head -5

command: which apt dnf pacman yum 2>/dev/null


text:
NAME="Arch Linux"
PRETTY_NAME="Arch Linux"
ID=arch
BUILD_ID=rolling
ANSI_COLOR="38;2;23;147;209"


text:
/usr/bin/pacman

Command exited with code 3


thinking: The user is on Arch Linux, and they have `pacman`. For Arch, the way to check for orphaned packages is using `pacman -Qdt` (list packages that were installed as dependencies but are no longer required by any explicitly installed package).

text: Arch Linux with `pacman`. Checking for orphaned packages now:

command:
# List orphaned packages (installed as deps, no longer needed)
orphaned=$(pacman -Qdtq 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$orphaned" ]; then
  echo "No orphaned packages found."
else
  count=$(echo "$orphaned" | wc -l)
  echo "Found $count orphaned package(s):"
  echo "$orphaned"
fi

command:
# Also check for packages not in any explicit group/repo
pacman -Qmq 2>/dev/null | wc -l && echo "foreign packages (AUR/manual)" || true


text:
Found 7 orphaned package(s):
cabal-install
chrpath
cmake
ghc
go
qt5-tools
rustup


text:
59
foreign packages (AUR/manual)


thinking:
So the user has:
1. 7 orphaned packages (installed as dependencies but no longer explicitly needed)
2. 59 foreign packages (from AUR or manually installed)

The orphaned ones are:
- cabal-install
- chrpath
- cmake
- ghc
- go
- qt5-tools
- rustup

I should present this clearly and offer to remove them if they want.

text:
**Yes, you have orphaned packages!** Here's the summary:

### Orphaned Packages (7)
These were installed as dependencies but are no longer required:
| Package | Notes |
|---------|-------|
| `cabal-install` | Haskell build tool |
| `chrpath` | ELF rpath editor |
| `cmake` | Build system |
| `ghc` | Glasgow Haskell Compiler |
| `go` | Go language |
| `qt5-tools` | Qt5 development tools |
| `rustup` | Rust toolchain installer |

### Other Stats
- **59 foreign packages** — installed from AUR or manually (`pacman -Qm`)

---

**These 7 can probably be safely removed** with:
```bash
sudo pacman -Rns $(pacman -Qdtq)
```

Or if you want to keep any of them (e.g., you actively use `go`, `rustup`, `cmake`, or `ghc`), install them explicitly first:
```bash
sudo pacman -S go rustup cmake ghc
```

**Want me to remove the orphans, or would you like to review the 59 foreign packages too?**


text: in


thinking:
The user's messages keep getting fragmented: "can", "you", "check", "if", "i", "have", "orphaned", "packeges", "in". Then a compaction event.

They're asking: **"Can you check if I have orphaned packages in [something]?"**

They might mean:
1. Orphaned packages in their **Arch Linux system** — we already checked that (7 orphans found).
2. Orphaned packages in a **specific project** (node_modules, Python venv, etc.)
3. Orphaned packages in **context-mode itself**? No, context-mode doesn't really have packages.
4. Orphaned packages in **npm/node_modules**?

Wait — they said "in" and then the compaction happened. Maybe they meant "in context-mode" or "in npm" or "in the project"?

Given the context of this session (they asked about context-mode orphaned files, then Arch orphaned packages, then "in"), they're likely asking about a specific project directory or package manager.

But I don't know what project they're working on. The current working directory is `/home`. Let me check if there's a specific project they're working on.

Actually, looking at the compaction hint, it emphasizes using context-mode tools. But for checking orphaned packages "in" something, I need to know what.

Let me ask if they mean a specific project, or if they want me to check for orphaned npm packages, Python packages, etc. Or I could just check the current directory for common package files.

Actually, let me check the current directory for package files to see what project they might be working on.

text:
Your message got fragmented by compaction. It looks like you're asking:

> **"Can you check if I have orphaned packages in... [something]?"**

I already found **7 orphaned pacman packages** on your Arch system. But maybe you meant orphaned packages **in a project**? Let me check what's in your current directory:

command: ls -la /home


text:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root    8 Feb  4 20:21 .
dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root  122 Feb 13 23:24 ..
drwx------ 1 liph liph 1946 Jul  4 08:17 liph


thinking: The /home directory only has the user's home. The working directory is /home. Let me check common project directories or look for package.json, Cargo.toml, requirements.txt, etc. to understand what project they might be working with.

command:
# Look for common package files in home directory
find /home/liph -maxdepth 3 -name "package.json" -o -name "Cargo.toml" -o -name "requirements.txt" -o -name "Pipfile" -o -name "pyproject.toml" -o -name "Gemfile" -o -name "composer.json" -o -name "go.mod" 2>/dev/null | head -20


text:
/home/liph/.cache/opencode/package.json
/home/liph/dotfiles/package.json
/home/liph/netbox-docker/pyproject.toml
/home/liph/spotify/spotify_to_tidal/pyproject.toml


thinking:
Found some projects. The user might be asking about orphaned packages in one of these, or maybe they just meant "in general" and we've already answered. But since they specifically said "in", they probably had a specific target in mind.

Given the previous context (they asked about context-mode orphaned files first, then system orphaned packages, then "in"), they might be asking about orphaned packages in **npm/node_modules**, **Python**, or one of these specific projects.

I should ask for clarification, but I can also quickly check if there are obvious orphaned packages in these projects. Let me offer the options and check the most common ones.

text:
Found some projects with package files. Your fragmented message "can you check if i have orphaned packages in..." — what did you mean by **"in"**?

Here are the possibilities I found:

| Project | File | Type |
|---------|------|------|
| `/home/liph/dotfiles` | `package.json` | npm |
| `/home/liph/netbox-docker` | `pyproject.toml` | Python |
| `/home/liph/spotify/spotify_to_tidal` | `pyproject.toml` | Python |

Or did you mean:
- **"in the project I'm working on"** — what project?
- **"in npm/node_modules"** globally?
- **"in Python"** (pip packages)?
- **"in context-mode"** itself?

Tell me which one, or let me know what directory you're working in, and I'll check for orphaned packages there!


text: pacman


thinking:
The user's original message fragments are: "can", "you", "check", "if", "i", "have", "orphaned", "packeges", "in" (typo for packages), "pacman".

So the full message is: **"Can you check if I have orphaned packages in pacman?"**

I already answered this earlier! I found 7 orphaned packages:
- cabal-install
- chrpath
- cmake
- ghc
- go
- qt5-tools
- rustup

And I also found 59 foreign packages.

The user just repeated "pacman" after "in" - so they're confirming they meant orphaned packages in pacman. I already gave them that answer. Let me summarize again concisely.

text:
Ah! You were asking:

> **"Can you check if I have orphaned packages in pacman?"**

I already ran the check. Here's the answer:

### Orphaned Pacman Packages: **7 found**

| Package | What it is |
|---------|-----------|
| `cabal-install` | Haskell build tool |
| `chrpath` | ELF rpath editor |
| `cmake` | Build system |
| `ghc` | Glasgow Haskell Compiler |
| `go` | Go language |
| `qt5-tools` | Qt5 development tools |
| `rustup` | Rust toolchain installer |

### Also found:
- **59 foreign packages** (from AUR/manual install)

---

**Remove orphans safely:**
```bash
sudo pacman -Rns $(pacman -Qdtq)
```

**Or keep the ones you use** by marking them explicit first:
```bash
sudo pacman -S go rustup cmake ghc
```

Want me to run the removal command, or were you just checking?


text: and


thinking:
The user's message "and" got fragmented again by compaction. It seems like they're trying to complete a sentence like:

"Can you check if I have orphaned packages in pacman and [something else]?"

Or maybe "and remove them?"

Let me ask what they meant by "and" since it's ambiguous. But also, maybe I should just offer the most likely continuations:

1. "and remove them?" → Yes, I can help remove them
2. "and in other package managers?" → Could check npm, pip, cargo, etc.
3. "and check context-mode too?" → Already did
4. "and check what else is wrong?" → Could run broader diagnostics

I'll offer the most likely options concisely.

text:
Your message got cut off at **"and"**. Did you mean:

1. **"and remove them?"** → I can run the cleanup command
2. **"and in other package managers?"** → Check npm, pip, cargo, etc.
3. **"and check for other issues?"** → Run a broader system health check
4. **"and what about those foreign packages?"** → Review the 59 AUR/manual packages

What were you going to say?


text: paru


thinking:
The user's message is fragmented again. They said "and" then "paru". They're likely asking:

"Can you check if I have orphaned packages in pacman and paru?"

Paru is an AUR helper for Arch Linux. Let me check for orphaned packages specifically related to paru/AUR.

text: Ah! **"and paru"** — checking AUR/orphaned packages via paru now:

command:
# Check if paru is installed
which paru &>/dev/null && echo "paru installed" || echo "paru not installed"

command:
# List explicitly installed foreign (AUR) packages that may be orphaned
pacman -Qmq 2>/dev/null | head -30


text: paru installed


text:
abook
betterbird-bin
carapace-bin
catppuccin-gtk-theme-mocha
claude-desktop-bin
dracula-gtk-theme-full
firefox-nightly-bin
gconf
gh-dash-bin
github-cli-git
gksu
gruvbox-material-gtk-theme-git
gtk2
i2p-bin
input-wacom-dkms
java-service-wrapper
kanata-bin
libgksu
libgnome-keyring
librewolf-bin
mkpdf
musikcube-bin
neofetch
netbird-bin
nmtui-go
obsidian-bin
oh-my-posh-bin
opencode-bin
openssl-1.1
opentabletdriver


thinking: Paru is installed. The user has 59 foreign (AUR) packages. Let me check if any of these AUR packages have orphaned dependencies or if any AUR packages themselves are no longer available upstream (true orphans).

command:
# Check for AUR packages that are no longer in the AUR (true orphans)
# This queries the AUR RPC for each foreign package
echo "Checking AUR for orphaned/unavailable packages..."
for pkg in $(pacman -Qmq); do
  # Check if package exists in AUR
  response=$(curl -s "https://aur.archlinux.org/rpc/v5/info?arg=${pkg}" 2>/dev/null)
  if echo "$response" | grep -q '"resultcount":0'; then
    echo "NOT IN AUR: $pkg"
  fi
done | head -20


text:
Checking AUR for orphaned/unavailable packages...
NOT IN AUR: paru-debug


thinking:
The user has paru installed. I found:
1. `paru-debug` is a debug package that's not in the AUR (expected for -debug packages)
2. 59 foreign packages total
3. 7 orphaned pacman packages from earlier

Let me also check if paru itself can identify orphans.

text:
Here's your **paru** status:

### Paru Info
- ✅ **Paru is installed**

### Foreign (AUR) Packages: **59 total**
Some highlights from your AUR packages:
- `betterbird-bin`, `claude-desktop-bin`, `firefox-nightly-bin`, `librewolf-bin`, `obsidian-bin`
- `gh-dash-bin`, `github-cli-git`, `netbird-bin`, `opencode-bin`, `nmtui-go`
- `neofetch`, `kanata-bin`, `musikcube-bin`, `oh-my-posh-bin`
- Various themes: `catppuccin-gtk-theme-mocha`, `dracula-gtk-theme-full`, `gruvbox-material-gtk-theme-git`

### AUR Orphans
Only **1 package not found in AUR**:
- `paru-debug` — this is just a debug symbol package, normal to not be in AUR

---

**Want me to check anything specific?**
- Remove the 7 pacman orphans?
- Check if any AUR packages are outdated (`paru -Qua`)?
- Check AUR package dependencies that are orphaned?

Just say what you need!