{"type":"session","version":3,"id":"019f9354-a84f-7e96-99e0-83e86e7255d8","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:53:46.703Z","cwd":"/mnt/flash1/code/webstore"}
{"type":"model_change","id":"72dd41b5","parentId":null,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:53:47.730Z","provider":"ollama","modelId":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud"}
{"type":"thinking_level_change","id":"abb8d383","parentId":"72dd41b5","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:53:47.730Z","thinkingLevel":"medium"}
{"type":"message","id":"7c713289","parentId":"abb8d383","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:56:27.103Z","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\nReferences are relative to /home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/plan.\n\n# plan\n\nInvoke the babysitter:babysit skill (using the Skill tool) and follow its instructions (SKILL.md). Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\n\nBefore drafting the process, run Phase 0 -- REUSE-AUDIT: extract keyword nouns and verbs from the request, scan for matching existing migrations, API routes, environment variables, SDK dependencies, and imports, honor `.a5c/reuse-audit.json` when present, and put a `Reuse-audit findings (REVIEW BEFORE PROCEEDING)` block before Phase 1 of the plan.\n\n## Process Shape Selection\n\nChoose the process shape before authoring `process.js`:\n\n- Use a flat phase list when the spec is well-defined, the work is wiring or composition, the bug class is already known if this is a fix, and execution should proceed sequentially through clear phases.\n- Use a HYPOTHESES tree when the bug class is unknown, forensics are required, multiple causal models compete, and each hypothesis needs its own observations, falsifying observations, and follow-up phases.\n- Rule of thumb: if the first phase is \"investigate\", use HYPOTHESES-tree mode. If the first phase is \"implement X\", use flat-phase-list mode.\n\n\ncan you plan out a webpage with integrated ecommerce store. the custormers should be able to login with their credentials. the store is based on a database which i assimilate in nocodb. the page should contain: Home, Shop, Philosophy, Contact"}],"timestamp":1784883386847}}
{"type":"message","id":"d16b7ee0","parentId":"7c713289","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:56:33.565Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The user wants me to plan out a webpage with an integrated ecommerce store. They've mentioned context-mode and a \"plan\" skill. However, I need to be careful here.\n\nThe user is asking me to \"plan out\" a webpage, and the skill instruction says to invoke the babysitter:babysit skill. But actually, this seems like a straightforward request that doesn't necessarily require the complex babysitter workflow. Let me think about this carefully.\n\nThe skill says: \"Invoke the babysitter:babysit skill (using the Skill tool) and follow its instructions (SKILL.md). Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\"\n\nBut wait - I should first check if there are ambiguity/underspecification issues that need clarification. The request has several vague points:\n- What tech stack? (React, Vue, plain HTML, Next.js, etc.)\n- What kind of products?\n- What authentication system?\n- Is this a new project or existing codebase?\n- What's the current working directory status?\n\nBefore invoking a complex babysitter process, I should ask clarifying questions because the request is underspecified. The plan skill itself says \"without creating and running the actual run\" - so maybe it's asking me to create a process plan. But this could also be interpreted as just asking for a high-level plan/advice.\n\nGiven that the user has provided a skill directive, I should consider following it. But the skill says to use the \"babysitter:babysit\" skill which I have available. However, before doing that, I should check if I need clarification.\n\nActually, looking at the available tools, I should use ask_user_question for ambiguous requirements. The request is definitely ambiguous:\n1. Tech stack/framework\n2. Existing codebase or new project\n3. Product/domain details\n4. Authentication provider preferences\n5. NocoDB integration details (REST API, existing schema, etc.)\n\nBut the skill instruction specifically says to invoke babysitter:babysit. Hmm.\n\nWait, re-reading: \"can you plan out a webpage with integrated ecommerce store.\" This is the user's actual request. The skill is an instruction about HOW to handle \"plan\" requests. It wants me to create a process plan, not just ask questions.\n\nBut I still think I should ask clarifying questions first because without them I can't create a meaningful process. Actually, the skill says \"Focus on creating the best process possible\" - so maybe I should create a generic/assumption-based process if needed, but asking clarifying questions is better practice.\n\nLet me check the current project structure to understand if there's an existing codebase.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"text","text":"I'll first inspect the current project to understand what already exists, then ask a few clarifying questions before producing the plan."},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:0","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"ls -la && echo \"---\" && find . -maxdepth 2 -type f | head -50","timeout":30}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":16121,"output":607,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":16728,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883387141,"responseId":"chatcmpl-251","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"899262ee","parentId":"d16b7ee0","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:56:33.581Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:0","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"total 8\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 10:53 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 10:53 ..\n---\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883393581}}
{"type":"message","id":"7ce4bca0","parentId":"899262ee","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:56:42.859Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The project directory is empty. Now I should ask clarifying questions because the request is underspecified. I need 2-4 questions with 2-4 options each.\n\nKey ambiguities:\n1. Tech stack/framework - this is the biggest one\n2. Authentication approach\n3. Product catalog details / NocoDB schema\n4. Design/template approach (custom vs off-the-shelf)\n\nLet me create good questions with options and some previews where helpful.\n\nI should not invoke babysitter yet - first get clarification. The skill instruction is about process planning, but asking clarifying questions is still the right first step for an underspecified request.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"text","text":"The workspace is empty, so this will be a green-field project. Before I can produce a useful process plan, I need to clarify a few foundational choices:"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.ask_user_question:1","name":"ask_user_question","arguments":{"questions":[{"options":[{"description":"Full-stack React with API routes, SSR/SSG, and easy auth integration. Best for ecommerce SEO and checkout flows.","label":"Next.js (Recommended)","preview":"```bash\nnpx create-next-app@latest webstore --typescript --tailwind --eslint --app --src-dir\n# Integrated API routes for auth & NocoDB proxy\n# Stripe/PayPal checkout via server actions\n```"},{"description":"Simple static site, no build step. Good for a small catalog but auth/checkout will need a backend or third-party service.","label":"Plain HTML + JS + Tailwind"},{"description":"Fast dev experience, pure client-side. Needs a separate backend API for auth, payments, and NocoDB access.","label":"React SPA + Vite"},{"description":"Astro, SvelteKit, Vue/Nuxt, Django, etc. We'll tailor the process to your preference.","label":"Other ( specify )"}],"question":"Which frontend stack do you want to use?"},{"options":[{"description":"Traditional login with secure hashing (NextAuth/Auth.js, Supabase Auth, or a custom backend).","label":"Email + password (Recommended)"},{"description":"Passwordless via email one-time code. Higher conversion, no password management.","label":"Magic link / OTP"},{"description":"Social login only. Simpler UX but excludes customers without those accounts.","label":"OAuth (Google, GitHub, etc.)"},{"description":"Email/password plus OAuth and optional magic link. Most flexible but more initial setup.","label":"All of the above"}],"question":"How do you want customers to authenticate?"},{"options":[{"description":"Each product has one SKU, one price, one stock count. Easiest to model in NocoDB.","label":"Simple catalog (fixed price, no variants)"},{"description":"Each product has multiple SKUs/options, each with its own price/stock. Needs a variant table.","label":"Products with variants (size, color, etc.)"},{"description":"No shipping, file delivery after purchase. Stock is usually unlimited.","label":"Digital goods / downloads"},{"description":"Memberships or recurring boxes. Requires Stripe subscriptions and webhook handling.","label":"Subscription / recurring"}],"question":"What products will the store sell and how is pricing structured?"},{"options":[{"description":"Mature APIs, hosted checkout, strong NocoDB-friendly webhook automation. Works in most countries.","label":"Stripe (Recommended)"},{"description":"Popular buyer trust, easy button integration, fewer modern checkout features.","label":"PayPal"},{"description":"Offer customers choice. Adds integration complexity and reconciliation work.","label":"Both Stripe + PayPal"},{"description":"No payment provider integration; orders are created as pending until you confirm payment.","label":"Manual bank transfer / invoice"}],"question":"Which payment provider do you prefer?"}]}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":16322,"output":832,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":17154,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883393584,"responseId":"chatcmpl-308","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"0a9d0b6d","parentId":"7ce4bca0","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:56:42.863Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.ask_user_question:1","toolName":"ask_user_question","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Validation failed for tool \"ask_user_question\":\n - questions.0.header: must have required properties header\n - questions.1.header: must have required properties header\n - questions.2.header: must have required properties header\n - questions.3.header: must have required properties header\n\nReceived arguments:\n{\n \"questions\": [\n {\n \"options\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Full-stack React with API routes, SSR/SSG, and easy auth integration. Best for ecommerce SEO and checkout flows.\",\n \"label\": \"Next.js (Recommended)\",\n \"preview\": \"```bash\\nnpx create-next-app@latest webstore --typescript --tailwind --eslint --app --src-dir\\n# Integrated API routes for auth & NocoDB proxy\\n# Stripe/PayPal checkout via server actions\\n```\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Simple static site, no build step. Good for a small catalog but auth/checkout will need a backend or third-party service.\",\n \"label\": \"Plain HTML + JS + Tailwind\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Fast dev experience, pure client-side. Needs a separate backend API for auth, payments, and NocoDB access.\",\n \"label\": \"React SPA + Vite\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Astro, SvelteKit, Vue/Nuxt, Django, etc. We'll tailor the process to your preference.\",\n \"label\": \"Other ( specify )\"\n }\n ],\n \"question\": \"Which frontend stack do you want to use?\"\n },\n {\n \"options\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Traditional login with secure hashing (NextAuth/Auth.js, Supabase Auth, or a custom backend).\",\n \"label\": \"Email + password (Recommended)\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Passwordless via email one-time code. Higher conversion, no password management.\",\n \"label\": \"Magic link / OTP\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Social login only. Simpler UX but excludes customers without those accounts.\",\n \"label\": \"OAuth (Google, GitHub, etc.)\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Email/password plus OAuth and optional magic link. Most flexible but more initial setup.\",\n \"label\": \"All of the above\"\n }\n ],\n \"question\": \"How do you want customers to authenticate?\"\n },\n {\n \"options\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Each product has one SKU, one price, one stock count. Easiest to model in NocoDB.\",\n \"label\": \"Simple catalog (fixed price, no variants)\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Each product has multiple SKUs/options, each with its own price/stock. Needs a variant table.\",\n \"label\": \"Products with variants (size, color, etc.)\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"No shipping, file delivery after purchase. Stock is usually unlimited.\",\n \"label\": \"Digital goods / downloads\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Memberships or recurring boxes. Requires Stripe subscriptions and webhook handling.\",\n \"label\": \"Subscription / recurring\"\n }\n ],\n \"question\": \"What products will the store sell and how is pricing structured?\"\n },\n {\n \"options\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Mature APIs, hosted checkout, strong NocoDB-friendly webhook automation. Works in most countries.\",\n \"label\": \"Stripe (Recommended)\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Popular buyer trust, easy button integration, fewer modern checkout features.\",\n \"label\": \"PayPal\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Offer customers choice. Adds integration complexity and reconciliation work.\",\n \"label\": \"Both Stripe + PayPal\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"No payment provider integration; orders are created as pending until you confirm payment.\",\n \"label\": \"Manual bank transfer / invoice\"\n }\n ],\n \"question\": \"Which payment provider do you prefer?\"\n }\n ]\n}"}],"details":{},"isError":true,"timestamp":1784883402863}}
{"type":"message","id":"0caff6bf","parentId":"0a9d0b6d","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:56:48.337Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"I got an error - I need to include a \"header\" property for each question. Let me restructure the questions with headers.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.ask_user_question:2","name":"ask_user_question","arguments":{"questions":[{"header":"Tech stack","options":[{"description":"Full-stack React with API routes, SSR/SSG, and easy auth integration. Best for ecommerce SEO and checkout flows.","label":"Next.js (Recommended)","preview":"```bash\nnpx create-next-app@latest webstore --typescript --tailwind --eslint --app --src-dir\n# Integrated API routes for auth & NocoDB proxy\n# Stripe/PayPal checkout via server actions\n```"},{"description":"Simple static site, no build step. Good for a small catalog but auth/checkout will need a backend or third-party service.","label":"Plain HTML + JS + Tailwind"},{"description":"Fast dev experience, pure client-side. Needs a separate backend API for auth, payments, and NocoDB access.","label":"React SPA + Vite"},{"description":"Astro, SvelteKit, Vue/Nuxt, Django, etc. We'll tailor the process to your preference.","label":"Other ( specify )"}],"question":"Which frontend stack do you want to use?"},{"header":"Authentication","options":[{"description":"Traditional login with secure hashing (NextAuth/Auth.js, Supabase Auth, or a custom backend).","label":"Email + password (Recommended)"},{"description":"Passwordless via email one-time code. Higher conversion, no password management.","label":"Magic link / OTP"},{"description":"Social login only. Simpler UX but excludes customers without those accounts.","label":"OAuth (Google, GitHub, etc.)"},{"description":"Email/password plus OAuth and optional magic link. Most flexible but more initial setup.","label":"All of the above"}],"question":"How do you want customers to authenticate?"},{"header":"Product catalog","options":[{"description":"Each product has one SKU, one price, one stock count. Easiest to model in NocoDB.","label":"Simple catalog (fixed price, no variants)"},{"description":"Each product has multiple SKUs/options, each with its own price/stock. Needs a variant table.","label":"Products with variants (size, color, etc.)"},{"description":"No shipping, file delivery after purchase. Stock is usually unlimited.","label":"Digital goods / downloads"},{"description":"Memberships or recurring boxes. Requires Stripe subscriptions and webhook handling.","label":"Subscription / recurring"}],"question":"What products will the store sell and how is pricing structured?"},{"header":"Payments","options":[{"description":"Mature APIs, hosted checkout, strong NocoDB-friendly webhook automation. Works in most countries.","label":"Stripe (Recommended)"},{"description":"Popular buyer trust, easy button integration, fewer modern checkout features.","label":"PayPal"},{"description":"Offer customers choice. Adds integration complexity and reconciliation work.","label":"Both Stripe + PayPal"},{"description":"No payment provider integration; orders are created as pending until you confirm payment.","label":"Manual bank transfer / invoice"}],"question":"Which payment provider do you prefer?"}]}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":17948,"output":649,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":18597,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883402864,"responseId":"chatcmpl-65","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"ca69b042","parentId":"0caff6bf","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:33.575Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.ask_user_question:2","toolName":"ask_user_question","content":[{"type":"text","text":"User has answered your questions: \"Which frontend stack do you want to use?\"=\"Next.js (Recommended)\". selected preview: ```bash\nnpx create-next-app@latest webstore --typescript --tailwind --eslint --app --src-dir\n# Integrated API routes for auth & NocoDB proxy\n# Stripe/PayPal checkout via server actions\n```. \"How do you want customers to authenticate?\"=\"Email + password (Recommended)\". \"What products will the store sell and how is pricing structured?\"=\"Products with variants (size, color, etc.)\". \"Which payment provider do you prefer?\"=\"Stripe, Paypal, Bank transfer / invoice\". You can now continue with the user's answers in mind."}],"details":{"answers":[{"questionIndex":0,"question":"Which frontend stack do you want to use?","kind":"option","answer":"Next.js (Recommended)","preview":"```bash\nnpx create-next-app@latest webstore --typescript --tailwind --eslint --app --src-dir\n# Integrated API routes for auth & NocoDB proxy\n# Stripe/PayPal checkout via server actions\n```"},{"questionIndex":1,"question":"How do you want customers to authenticate?","kind":"option","answer":"Email + password (Recommended)"},{"questionIndex":2,"question":"What products will the store sell and how is pricing structured?","kind":"option","answer":"Products with variants (size, color, etc.)"},{"questionIndex":3,"question":"Which payment provider do you prefer?","kind":"custom","answer":"Stripe, Paypal, Bank transfer / invoice"}],"cancelled":false},"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883513575}}
{"type":"message","id":"4358d5e8","parentId":"ca69b042","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:45.331Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The user selected \"Stripe, Paypal, Bank transfer / invoice\" for payments, which seems to combine options. Actually looking at the response, it looks like the user selected the preview with all three payment options combined. Let me interpret this as: they want Stripe, PayPal, and bank transfer/invoice as options. That's a reasonable interpretation - maybe they want all three. But actually the way the tool responded, it says \"Stripe, Paypal, Bank transfer / invoice\" as if those are the labels. Wait, the original labels were \"Both Stripe + PayPal\" and \"Manual bank transfer / invoice\" - so the user seems to want all three. That's complex but possible.\n\nNow I need to plan out the webpage. Given the skill instruction, I should use the babysitter:babysit skill to create a process plan. The skill says \"Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\"\n\nI should also do a reuse audit as Phase 0. Since the workspace is empty, there's nothing to reuse, but I should still follow the process.\n\nNow I need to invoke the babysitter:babysit skill. But actually, the user wants me to plan, and I have the details. Let me read the babysit skill to understand how to use it.\n\nActually, re-reading the skill directive more carefully: \"Invoke the babysitter:babysit skill (using the Skill tool) and follow its instructions (SKILL.md).\"\n\nThe \"Skill tool\" mentioned is likely the skill reading mechanism. But in this environment, I can use subagent to invoke babysitter. Let me think.\n\nActually, the skill files are just instructions. The user gave me the plan skill which tells me to invoke babysitter:babysit. I could:\n1. Read the babysit SKILL.md\n2. Then use subagent to invoke it, OR\n3. Just create the process plan myself following the babysit instructions\n\nLet me read the babysit skill first.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"text","text":"I'll read the babysitter orchestration skill and then produce a structured process plan for your ecommerce site."},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.read:3","name":"read","arguments":{"path":"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/babysit/SKILL.md"}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":18759,"output":473,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":19232,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883513577,"responseId":"chatcmpl-17","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"4b9e5ca0","parentId":"4358d5e8","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:45.335Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.read:3","toolName":"read","content":[{"type":"text","text":"---\nname: babysit\ndescription: Execute via @babysitter. Use this skill when asked to babysit a task, do anything that is structured process-driven (even a loop) or whenever it is called explicitly. (babysit, babysitter, with a process, orchestrate, orchestrate a run, workflow, loop until, etc.)\nallowed-tools: Read, Grep, Write, Task, Bash, Edit, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch, Search, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, TodoRead, Skill, BashOutput, KillShell, MultiEdit, LS\nversion: 0.1.3\n---\n\n# babysit\n\nFollow the commands below exactly. but apply judgement and creativity to get the job done. no matter how small or simple the task may seem, you must use the babysitter SDK and run lifecycle to execute it. This is non-negotiable. If you are asked to do something that seems like it could be done with a simple tool call, you must still use the babysitter SDK to create a run, define tasks, execute them, and complete the run. This is how you will learn and demonstrate mastery of the babysitter system. Always follow the full process, even for trivial tasks.\n\nSubagents that need a scratch checkout or working directory must create it under\n`/tmp//`, not under `.a5c/runs//work`. Before returning\ndeliverables, validate that no run-dir worktree was left behind, for example:\n\n```bash\nfind .a5c/runs -maxdepth 3 -name work -type d -print\n```\n\nThat command should print nothing. If it prints a non-empty work directory, move\nor remove only the scratch data you created before returning.\n\n## Dependencies\n\n### Babysitter SDK and CLI\n\nRead the SDK version from `versions.json` to ensure version compatibility:\n\n```bash\nSDK_VERSION=$(node -e \"try{console.log(JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('${PLUGIN_ROOT}/versions.json','utf8')).sdkVersion||'latest')}catch{console.log('latest')}\")\nnpm i -g @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@$SDK_VERSION || npm i -g @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@latest\n\nif command -v babysitter >/dev/null 2>&1 && babysitter --version >/dev/null 2>&1; then\n CLI=\"babysitter\"\nelse\n CLI=\"npm exec --yes --package @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@$SDK_VERSION -- babysitter\"\nfi\n```\n\nIf the pinned version fails to install (e.g. not yet published), the fallback installs `latest`.\n\nIf a stale or broken global shim fails with `MODULE_NOT_FOUND`, repair it with `npm rm -g @a5c-ai/babysitter @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk && npm i -g @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@$SDK_VERSION`, then re-run `babysitter --version`.\n\n### jq\n\nMake sure `jq` is installed and available in the path. If not, install it.\n\n## Instructions\n\nRun the following command to get full instructions:\n\n```bash\n$CLI instructions:babysit-skill --harness pi --interactive\n```\n\nFor non-interactive mode (running with `-p` flag or no AskUserQuestion tool):\n\n```bash\n$CLI instructions:babysit-skill --harness pi --no-interactive\n```\n\nFollow the instructions returned by the command above to orchestrate the run.\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883525335}}
{"type":"message","id":"1235cec2","parentId":"4b9e5ca0","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:49.563Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"I see - the babysit skill wants me to use the babysitter SDK/CLI. The plan skill says to invoke babysitter:babysit but \"Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\"\n\nSo I need to use the babysitter CLI to get the actual instructions for creating a process plan. But I also need to not actually run it - just plan.\n\nLet me run the CLI instructions command to see what the babysitter expects. I should check if babysitter is installed first.\n\nActually, the instructions are to run `$CLI instructions:babysit-skill --harness pi --interactive` or `--no-interactive`. Since I'm planning, maybe I should use the plan skill specifically? Wait, the plan skill I read says to invoke babysitter:babysit. Hmm.\n\nActually, there's a \"plan\" skill too: ``. The user explicitly included the plan skill. The plan skill says to invoke babysitter:babysit and follow its instructions. But it also says \"Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\"\n\nI think the plan skill is telling me to use the babysitter to create a process definition (process.js) but not to actually execute the run. Let me follow the babysit instructions to do this.\n\nFirst, check if babysitter CLI is available and get the instructions.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:4","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"if command -v babysitter >/dev/null 2>&1 && babysitter --version >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo \"babysitter available: $(babysitter --version)\"; else echo \"babysitter not available, will use npm exec\"; fi"}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":19992,"output":361,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":20353,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883525337,"responseId":"chatcmpl-400","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"fc93fa8c","parentId":"1235cec2","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:49.572Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:4","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"babysitter not available, will use npm exec\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883529572}}
{"type":"message","id":"df0e09e5","parentId":"fc93fa8c","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:51.801Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Babysitter is not installed. I need to install it or use npm exec. Let me check the plugin root for versions.json to get the SDK version.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:5","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"ls /home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/ && echo \"---\" && cat /home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/versions.json 2>/dev/null || echo \"no versions.json\""}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":20401,"output":129,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":20530,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883529573,"responseId":"chatcmpl-267","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"8e977d84","parentId":"df0e09e5","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:51.809Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:5","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"AGENTS.md\nbin\ncommands\nextensions\nhooks\npackage.json\nREADME.md\nscripts\nskills\nversions.json\n---\n{\n \"sdkVersion\": \"6.0.2\",\n \"extensionVersion\": \"6.0.2\"\n}\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883531809}}
{"type":"message","id":"c0b3e1fb","parentId":"8e977d84","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:54.678Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"SDK version is 6.0.2. Let me install the babysitter SDK globally and then get the instructions. But wait - the user just wants a plan. The plan skill says to use babysitter:babysit. Let me install the SDK and follow the instructions.\n\nActually, installing things globally might take time and might not be necessary. The plan skill says to create the best process without running the actual run. So I need to produce a process.js or similar.\n\nLet me first try npm exec to get instructions.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:6","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"npm exec --yes --package @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@6.0.2 -- babysitter instructions:babysit-skill --harness pi --no-interactive","timeout":120}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":20599,"output":167,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":20766,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883531811,"responseId":"chatcmpl-834","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"b5c14063","parentId":"c0b3e1fb","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:58:56.783Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:6","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":" use `kind: 'shell'` with `expectedExitCode` for binary pass/fail enforcement\n- correct: use `agent` or `skill` tasks for reasoning work (planning, code\n review, architecture assessment, subjective evaluation)\n- correct: use `shell` tasks for all objectively verifiable checks (tsc, eslint,\n vitest, grep, dependency imports, runtime smoke tests)\n- correct: include verification loops, refinement loops, quality gates, and\n breakpoints where appropriate\n- correct: pair shell verification gates with agent analysis tasks (shell runs\n the check, agent interprets failures and suggests fixes)\n- correct: for brownfield changes, trace the runtime call path from entry points\n to final output first, record as `runtimeCallPaths`, and scope modifications\n only to files on the live execution path (see ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md Pattern 9)\n\n### Drift-resistant prompt composition (issue #129)\n\nIn multi-phase processes, your own attention is biased toward recently-built\nimplementation artifacts when you compose later-phase agent prompts. This\nsystematically rewrites spec acceptance criteria to match what got built --\ne.g. \"integration test with ReplicatedTransform sync\" silently becomes \"unit\ntest calling tick_projectile with MockWorld\". All tests then pass (exit 0)\nwhile testing the wrong thing. The defense is to keep spec bytes out of your\ncompose pass entirely.\n\n**Runtime-read pattern (mandatory for spec-bearing prompts).** Never paraphrase\nor inline spec text when authoring a prompt literal. Instead, read the spec\nfile at run time via a `kind: 'shell'` task and interpolate its stdout into\nthe downstream agent prompt verbatim:\n\n```javascript\nconst spec = await ctx.task({\n kind: 'shell',\n command: `cat specs/projectile-sync.md`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n});\n\nawait ctx.task({\n kind: 'agent',\n prompt: [\n 'SPEC (verbatim, do not paraphrase):',\n '---',\n spec.stdout,\n '---',\n 'Your task: author integration tests that exercise every acceptance',\n 'criterion above. Cite spec lines in test names.',\n ].join('\\n'),\n});\n```\n\nThe `cat` runs at execution time, so the spec content bypasses the process-\nauthoring compose pass where proximity bias operates. You only ever write the\n`cat` line; the runtime pulls the spec bytes fresh from disk. This works for\nany spec source (markdown, `bd show > /tmp/spec.md && cat /tmp/spec.md`,\nissue body dumps, etc.).\n\n**Recency-anchored verification prompts.** Verification/acceptance agent\nprompts must end with two freshly-interpolated blocks -- a `SPEC (verbatim)`\nblock read via `cat`, followed by an `ARTIFACTS (verbatim)` block read via\n`cat`/`git show` on the produced files -- followed by one line: \"Compare\nSPEC to ARTIFACTS directly. Ignore any narrative in your context about how\nARTIFACTS were built.\" Do not summarize either block. Put the spec last so\nthe verifier's own attention anchors on it.\n\n**Test-authoring phase must precede implementation.** In any multi-phase\nprocess with a verification/test gate, order the test-authoring phase before\nthe first implementation phase. Its agent prompt must use the runtime-read\npattern for the spec and must include: \"Do not read files under\nimplementation directories. Author tests strictly from the spec text above.\"\nThe committed tests become frozen inputs to later implementation phases --\nimplementation cannot retroactively redefine what \"correct\" means. If the\nspec is underspecified, this surfaces as \"cannot author tests\" at phase 1\nrather than hiding as \"tests that test the wrong thing\" at phase 5.\n\n---\n\n### 2.0 Run Overlap Detection\n\nBefore calling `$CLI run:create`, scan for recent runs that may already cover\nthe same work. This avoids creating duplicate runs that waste tokens and\ncomplicate the run history.\n\n**Scan procedure:**\n\n1. List recent run directories:\n ```bash\n ls -lt ~/.a5c/runs/ | head -20\n ```\n2. For each run created within the last 30 minutes, read its metadata:\n ```bash\n cat ~/.a5c/runs//run.json\n ```\n3. Compare the candidate run's `prompt` and `processId` against the new\n request:\n - **Keyword overlap**: does the existing prompt share 3 or more significant\n keywords with the new prompt?\n - **Process match**: does `processId` match the process you intend to use?\n4. If overlap is detected, check its current status:\n ```bash\n $CLI run:status ~/.a5c/runs/\n ```\n\n**If an overlapping run is found:**\n\nLog a warning with the overlapping run's details (runId, processId, createdAt,\nstatus) and continue creating the new run. Non-interactive mode does not block\non overlap — the caller is responsible for deduplication.\n\n**No overlap found:** proceed directly to `$CLI run:create` as normal.\n\nIf the current repo is still using legacy repo-local runs, the SDK will also read `/.a5c/runs` automatically for compatibility.\n\n**Tracking run chains:**\n\nWhen creating a run that intentionally follows or retries a previous run,\ninclude the related run ID in the inputs so the process can reference it:\n\n```json\n{\n \"relatedRunId\": \"\",\n \"relatedRunReason\": \"retry|variant|follow-up\"\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n### 2. Create run and bind session:\n\nIf an existing bare run is reported in the **Existing Run State** section above,\nuse `run:assign-process` (see below) instead of creating a new run.\n\n**For new runs:**\n\n```bash\n$CLI run:create \\\n --process-id \\\n --entry # \\\n --inputs \\\n --prompt \"$PROMPT\" \\\n --harness pi \\\n --json\n```\n\n**Required flags:**\n- `--process-id ` -- unique identifier for the process definition\n- `--entry #` -- path to the process JS file and its\n named export (e.g., `./my-process.js#process`). Omit to create a bare run\n (assign the process later via `run:assign-process`)\n- `--prompt \"$PROMPT\"` -- the user's initial prompt/request text\n- `--harness pi` -- activates Pi Coding Agent session binding. The session ID is\n auto-resolved from PI_SESSION_ID and AGENT_SESSION_ID.\n\n**Optional flags:**\n- `--inputs ` -- path to a JSON file with process inputs\n- `--run-id ` -- override auto-generated run ID\n- `--runs-dir ` -- advanced compatibility override for the runs directory (default: `~/.a5c/runs`, or `/.a5c/runs` when `BABYSITTER_RUNS_SCOPE=repo`)\n- `--non-interactive` -- auto-approve breakpoints without human interaction (yolo mode)\n\nThe session ID auto-resolves from the **PID-scoped session marker** written by\nthe session-start hook (authoritative), with the harness env file and\n`AGENT_SESSION_ID` env var used only as last-resort fallbacks. Orchestrators\ncan verify the binding at any time via `babysitter session:whoami --json`.\n\n**Common mistakes to avoid:**\n- wrong: Calling `session:init` explicitly\n- wrong: Fabricating a session ID when none is available from the environment\n- correct: Using `--harness pi` with `run:create` to create the run AND\n auto-bind the session, relying on the environment variables set by the\n extension for honest session binding.\n\n**For resuming existing runs:**\n\n```bash\n$CLI session:resume \\\n --session-id \\\n --run-id --json\n```\n\n**For assigning a process to an existing bare run:**\n\nWhen the session-start hook has already created a bare run (no `--entry`), use\n`run:assign-process` to attach the process definition, then bind the session:\n\n```bash\n# 1. Assign the process to the bare run\n$CLI run:assign-process \\\n --entry # \\\n --process-id \\\n --json\n\n# 2. Bind the session to the run (if not already bound by session-start)\n$CLI session:associate \\\n --session-id \\\n --run-id \\\n --state-dir \\\n --json\n```\n\n**Required arguments:**\n- `` — path to the existing run directory (positional)\n- `--entry #` — path to the process JS file and its named export\n\n**Optional flags:**\n- `--process-id ` — override the process identifier stored in the run (defaults to the existing `processId` from the bare run)\n- `--process-revision ` — pin a specific process revision\n- `--force` — allow re-assigning even if the run already has a process\n- `--dry-run` — validate without writing changes\n- `--json` — emit machine-readable JSON output\n- `--verbose` — log resolved paths and options to stderr\n\nThis command rejects if the run already has a process assigned unless `--force` is\npassed. On success it updates `run.json` and appends a `PROCESS_ASSIGNED` journal\nevent to the run.\n\n**Common mistakes to avoid:**\n- wrong: Always creating a new run when a bare run already exists from session-start\n- correct: Check `.a5c/runs/` for existing bare runs and use `run:assign-process`\n- wrong: Skipping `run:assign-process` and calling `run:iterate` on a bare run (will fail)\n\n---\n\n### 3. Run Iteration\n\n```bash\n$CLI run:iterate --json --iteration \n```\n\n**Output:**\n```json\n{\n \"iteration\": 1,\n \"status\": \"executed|waiting|completed|failed|none\",\n \"action\": \"executed-tasks|waiting|none\",\n \"reason\": \"auto-runnable-tasks|breakpoint-waiting|terminal-state\",\n \"count\": 3,\n \"completionProof\": \"only-present-when-completed\",\n \"metadata\": { \"runId\": \"...\", \"processId\": \"...\" }\n}\n```\n\n**Status values:**\n- `\"executed\"` - Tasks executed, continue looping\n- `\"waiting\"` - Breakpoint/sleep, pause until released\n- `\"completed\"` - Run finished successfully\n- `\"failed\"` - Run failed with error\n- `\"none\"` - No pending effects\n\n**Common mistake to avoid:**\n- wrong: Stopping the session and waiting for a hook callback that will never\n arrive\n- correct: After posting the result, continuing to the next run:iterate in the\n same turn until the run completes, since the stop-hook drives the loop\n in-turn\n\n---\n\n### 4. Get Effects\n\n```bash\n$CLI task:list --pending --json\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```json\n{\n \"tasks\": [\n {\n \"effectId\": \"effect-abc123\",\n \"kind\": \"agent|skill|shell|node|breakpoint\",\n \"label\": \"auto\",\n \"status\": \"requested\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\n### 5. Perform Effects\n\nRun the effect externally to the SDK (by you, your hook, or another worker).\nAfter execution (by delegation to an agent or skill), post the outcome summary\ninto the run by calling `task:post`, which:\n- Writes the committed result to `tasks//result.json`\n- Appends an `EFFECT_RESOLVED` event to the journal\n- Updates the state cache\n\nIMPORTANT:\n- Delegate using the Task tool if possible.\n- If a pending effect is `shell` or legacy `node`, the orchestrating agent must\n execute that work intentionally and then post the result via `task:post`.\n Never assume the SDK or host will auto-run it.\n- If a shell/effect keeps failing because the process logic is wrong, the\n command is impossible, or the recorded run state is inconsistent, do not just\n retry forever. Repair the process file itself and/or the relevant journal/task\n files, then continue the loop from the corrected state.\n- When delegating substantial work to an agent or skill, pass a generous\n timeout budget and instruct the worker to execute the task fully and return\n the actual result, not a plan.\n- Make sure the change was actually performed and not described or implied.\n (for example, if code files were mentioned as created in the summary, make\n sure they were actually created.)\n- Include in the instructions to the agent or skill to perform the task in\n full and return only the summary result in the requested schema.\n\n---\n\n#### 5.1 Breakpoint Handling\n\n##### 5.1.1 Interactive mode\n\nAsk the user explicitly for approval. Include explicit approve/reject options\nso the user's intent is unambiguous.\n\n**CRITICAL: Response validation rules:**\n- If the response is empty, no selection, or dismissed: treat as **NOT\n approved**. Re-ask the question or keep the breakpoint pending. Do NOT\n proceed.\n- NEVER fabricate, synthesize, or infer approval text. Only pass through the\n user's actual selected response verbatim.\n- NEVER assume approval from ambiguous, empty, or missing responses. When in\n doubt, the answer is \"not approved\".\n\n**CRITICAL: Breakpoint rejection posting rules:**\n- Breakpoint rejection MUST be posted with `--status ok` and a value of\n `{\"approved\": false, \"response\": \"...\"}`. NEVER use `--status error` for a\n user rejection -- that signals a task execution failure, not user feedback.\n If bad posted data later causes `PROCESS_RUNTIME_ERROR`, inspect it with\n `run:status`/`run:events` and recover with `run:recover-process-error`;\n reserve manual journal repair for malformed or partially written journal\n entries that targeted recovery cannot represent.\n- Only use `--status error` if the AskUserQuestion itself throws an error.\n\n**Breakpoint posting examples:**\n\n```bash\n# User approved the breakpoint\necho '{\"approved\": true, \"response\": \"Looks good, proceed\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n\n# User rejected the breakpoint (ALWAYS use --status ok, not --status error)\necho '{\"approved\": false, \"response\": \"Stop here\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n```\n\n**Breakpoint value payload schema:**\n\n| Field | Type | Required | Description |\n|-------|------|----------|-------------|\n| `approved` | `boolean` | Yes | Whether the user approved the breakpoint |\n| `response` | `string` | No | The user's response text or selected option |\n| `feedback` | `string` | No | Additional feedback from the user |\n\n##### 5.1.2 Auto-Approval Mode\n\nBreakpoint tasks may include a pre-computed `autoApproval` field in task.json:\n\n```json\n{\n \"autoApproval\": {\n \"recommended\": true,\n \"reason\": \"Matched auto-approve rule: rule-a1b2c3d4\",\n \"matchedRule\": \"rule-a1b2c3d4\",\n \"consecutiveApprovals\": 5\n }\n}\n```\n\nWhen `autoApproval.recommended` is `true`, the harness MAY auto-approve the\nbreakpoint without prompting the user. The `reason` field explains why.\n\nAlternatively, use the CLI to check at runtime:\n\n```bash\n$CLI breakpoint:should-auto-approve --tags --expert --json\n```\n\n**Important:** `never-auto-approve` rules and profile `alwaysBreakOn` tags\nalways override auto-approval. If `autoApproval.recommended` is `false`, always\nprompt the user.\n\n**Breakpoint auto-approval options in `ctx.breakpoint()`:**\n\n| Field | Type | Description |\n|-------|------|-------------|\n| `breakpointId` | `string` | Canonical identity (dotted namespace, kebab-case). Auto-derived from title if omitted. |\n| `autoApproveAfterN` | `number` | Auto-approve after N consecutive approvals. `-1` = disabled (default). |\n| `presentAlwaysApprove` | `boolean` | Show \"Always Approve\" option to user. Default: `true`. |\n\n##### 5.1.3 Non-interactive mode\n\nWhen the run was created with `--non-interactive`, breakpoints are auto-approved\nat the runtime level and never appear as pending effects. No orchestrator action\nis needed for breakpoints in this mode.\n\nIf running non-interactively without the `--non-interactive` flag (e.g. no\nquestion tool available), choose the best option from context and post the\nresult. Rejections still use `--status ok` with `{\"approved\": false}`.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Results Posting\n\n**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT write `result.json` directly. The SDK owns that file.\n\n**Workflow:**\n\n1. Write the result **value** to a separate file (e.g., `output.json` or\n `value.json`):\n```json\n{\n \"score\": 85,\n \"details\": { ... }\n}\n```\n\n2. Post the result, either by passing the value file or inline JSON:\n```bash\n$CLI task:post \\\n --status ok \\\n --value tasks//output.json \\\n --json\n\n$CLI task:post \\\n --status ok \\\n --value-inline '{\"score\": 85}' \\\n --json\n```\n\nThe `task:post` command will:\n- Read the value from your file or inline JSON\n- Write the complete `result.json` (including schema, metadata, and your value)\n- Append an `EFFECT_RESOLVED` event to the journal\n- Update the state cache\n\n**Available flags:**\n- `--status ` (required)\n- `--value ` - Result value (for status=ok)\n- `--value-inline ` - Inline result value JSON (for status=ok, cannot be combined with `--value`)\n- `--error ` - Error payload (for status=error)\n- `--stdout-file ` - Capture stdout\n- `--stderr-file ` - Capture stderr\n- `--started-at ` - Task start time\n- `--finished-at ` - Task end time\n- `--metadata ` - Additional metadata JSON\n\n**Common mistake to avoid:**\n```bash\n# wrong: Writing result.json directly\necho '{\"result\": {...}}' > tasks//result.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok\n\n# correct: Write value to a separate file or pass inline JSON, then let SDK create result.json\necho '{\"score\": 85}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value-inline '{\"score\": 85}'\n```\n\n**Breakpoint-specific posting:**\n\n```bash\n# Breakpoint approval\necho '{\"approved\": true, \"response\": \"User approved\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n\n# Breakpoint rejection (ALWAYS use --status ok, not --status error)\necho '{\"approved\": false, \"response\": \"User rejected\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n```\n\n---\n\n### 7. Drive the orchestration loop in-turn\n\nHooks are not available in this orchestration environment. You are responsible\nfor driving the loop yourself: after `run:create`, keep iterating in the same\nturn -- call `run:iterate`, inspect pending tasks, perform effects, call\n`task:post`, and repeat until the run reaches a terminal state or you need\nexplicit user input for a breakpoint.\n\nThis is not considered bypassing the orchestration model as long as each\niteration and effect is handled through the CLI and run journal.\n\nIf the loop is stuck because the process logic is wrong or because the same\nshell/effect keeps failing with no path to success, you must repair the run\ninstead of blindly retrying. Read the process file and run artifacts, then\nmodify the process file itself and/or adjust the relevant journal/task files so\nthat the next iteration can advance honestly.\n\nCommon mistakes to avoid:\n- wrong: Stopping the session and waiting for a hook callback that will never\n arrive.\n- correct: Continuing the orchestration loop in-turn: iterate, perform effects,\n post results, iterate again until the run completes.\n- wrong: Re-running the same failing shell task forever after it is clear the\n process logic or recorded effect state is broken.\n- correct: Repairing the process definition and, when necessary, the run's\n journal/task artifacts, then continuing iteration from the repaired state.\n- wrong: Skipping the CLI and executing tasks directly without the journal.\n- correct: Using `run:iterate` and `task:post` for every step, even when driving\n the loop yourself.\n\n---\n\n### 8. Completion Proof\n\nWhen the run is completed, the CLI will emit a `completionProof` value in the\noutput of `run:iterate` and `run:status`. You must return that exact value\nwrapped in a `...` tag to signal completion to the stop-hook\nloop.\n\n### Progressing Between The Phases\n\nAfter you run `run:create`, progress through the phases above by continuing\nto iterate in the same session. Drive the loop yourself: call `run:iterate`,\nperform effects, post results, and repeat until the run completes or you need\nexplicit user input for a breakpoint.\n\n---\n\n## Task Kinds\n\n**CRITICAL RULE: NEVER use `node` kind effects in generated processes.** The\n`node` kind executes inline Node.js scripts which bypasses the agent\norchestration model entirely. Every task that would be a `node` effect MUST be\nconverted to an `agent` or `skill` effect instead. The only acceptable\nnon-agent kinds are `shell` (for running existing test suites, git commands, or\nbuild tools), `breakpoint` (human approval), and `sleep` (time gates).\n\n| Kind | Description | Executor | When to use |\n|------|-------------|----------|-------------|\n| ~~`node`~~ | ~~Node.js script~~ | ~~Local node process~~ | **NEVER -- forbidden. Convert to `agent` or `skill`.** |\n| `shell` | Shell command | Local shell process | **Deterministic verification** (compilation, linting, tests, grep, dependency checks, smoke tests) AND running existing CLI tools, git, builds. The orchestrating agent must execute it intentionally and post the result |\n| `agent` | LLM agent | Agent runtime | **Default for reasoning tasks** -- planning, implementation, analysis, scoring, debugging, code writing, research. Also for **subjective verification** (code review, architecture assessment, UX evaluation) |\n| `skill` | | Skill system | When a matching installed skill exists (preferred over agent when available) |\n| `breakpoint` | Human approval | UI/CLI | Decision gates requiring user input. May include pre-computed `autoApproval` field with `{ recommended, reason, matchedRule?, consecutiveApprovals? }` for harness-mediated auto-approval. |\n| `sleep` | Time gate | Scheduler | Time-based pauses |\n\n### Shell vs Agent for Verification Tasks\n\n**CRITICAL:** Verification tasks that produce deterministic, binary pass/fail\nresults MUST use `kind: 'shell'` with `expectedExitCode`, NOT `kind: 'agent'`.\nAgent-interpreted verification creates soft gates where an LLM subjectively\nassesses pass/fail -- this is unreliable for objectively testable checks.\n\n| Verification type | Correct kind | Why |\n|-------------------|-------------|-----|\n| Compilation (tsc, gcc) | `shell` | Exit code is deterministic pass/fail |\n| Linting (eslint, ruff) | `shell` | Exit code is deterministic pass/fail |\n| Test suites (vitest, jest) | `shell` | Exit code is deterministic pass/fail |\n| Grep/pattern checks | `shell` | Pattern exists or it doesn't |\n| Dependency availability | `shell` | `node -e \"require('pkg')\"` succeeds or fails |\n| Runtime smoke tests | `shell` | Start, curl, check status code, stop |\n| Code review / design quality | `agent` | Requires subjective judgment |\n| Architecture assessment | `agent` | Requires reasoning about tradeoffs |\n| UX evaluation | `agent` | Subjective quality assessment |\n\n**Anti-pattern (wrong):**\n```javascript\n// BAD: agent-interpreted verification -- the agent can say \"looks good\" without running anything\nconst verifyTask = defineTask('verify-compilation', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Verify TypeScript compiles',\n agent: { prompt: { instructions: ['Run tsc and check it passes'] } }\n}));\n```\n\n**Correct pattern:**\n```javascript\n// GOOD: deterministic shell gate -- exit code cannot be negotiated\nconst verifyTask = defineTask('verify-compilation', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'TypeScript compilation check',\n shell: { command: 'npx tsc --noEmit', expectedExitCode: 0, timeout: 120000 }\n}));\n```\n\nUse `library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js` for composable\npreset gates (grep checks, compilation, test suites, runtime smoke tests).\n\n### Effect Execution Hints\n\nTasks can include an `execution` field to express preferences about how the effect should be executed:\n\n| Field | Description |\n|-------|-------------|\n| `execution.model` | Preferred model for the task (e.g., `'claude-opus-4-6'`). Used for subagent selection. |\n\n| `execution.harness` | Preferred internal harness CLI for the task. This is routing metadata for harnesses that implement it, not a universal plugin contract. |\n| `execution.permissions` | Internal harness permission hints. Plugins may ignore them; do not treat them as a cross-harness security boundary. |\n\nUse `execution.permissions` only when you are targeting an internal harness flow that actually interprets the hints. If a task must rely on a security boundary across plugin targets, encode that boundary in the execution path itself instead of assuming plugins will enforce these hints.\n\nExample:\n\n```javascript\ndefineTask('my-task', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'My task',\n execution: {\n model: 'claude-opus-4-6',\n\n harness: 'pi',\n permissions: ['fs:read', 'fs:write'],\n\n },\n agent: {\n name: 'general-purpose',\n prompt: {\n role: 'Task executor',\n task: 'Perform the requested work',\n context: { ...args },\n instructions: ['Execute the task'],\n outputFormat: 'JSON'\n },\n outputSchema: { type: 'object', required: ['result'] }\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/result.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\n---\n\n### Agent Task Example\n\nImportant: Check which subagents and agents are actually available before\nassigning the name. If none, pass the general-purpose subagent. Check the\nsubagents and agents in the plugin (in nested folders) and to find relevant\nsubagents and agents to use as a reference. Specifically check subagents and\nagents in folders next to the reference process file.\n\nWhen executing the agent task, use the Task tool. Never use the Babysitter skill\nor agent to execute the task.\nWhen the Task tool or delegated worker accepts a timeout, use a generous budget\nfor real coding or verification work instead of a short default.\n\n```javascript\nexport const agentTask = defineTask('agent-scorer', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Agent scoring',\n agent: {\n name: 'quality-scorer',\n prompt: {\n role: 'QA engineer',\n task: 'Score results 0-100',\n context: { ...args },\n instructions: ['Review', 'Score', 'Recommend'],\n outputFormat: 'JSON'\n },\n outputSchema: {\n type: 'object',\n required: ['score']\n }\n },\n\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\n### Shell Verification Task Example\n\nUse shell tasks for all deterministic verification gates. Shell tasks produce\nbinary pass/fail results via exit codes that cannot be bypassed by agent\nreasoning.\n\n```javascript\n// Grep-based integration check\nexport const grepCheckTask = defineTask('grep-integration-check', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'Verify integration points exist',\n shell: {\n command: `cd ${args.projectDir || '.'} && grep -q \"${args.pattern}\" ${args.file}`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 10000\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n\n// Multi-check verification gate\nexport const verificationGateTask = defineTask('verification-gate', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'Deterministic verification gate',\n shell: {\n command: [\n `cd ${args.projectDir || '.'}`,\n 'npx tsc --noEmit',\n 'npx eslint src/ --max-warnings=0',\n 'npx vitest run --reporter=verbose'\n ].join(' && '),\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 300000\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\nWhen downstream process code reads fields from a shell task's JSON result,\ndeclare a top-level `outputSchema`. Successful posts that do not match are\nrejected before `result.json` or `EFFECT_RESOLVED` is written.\n\n```javascript\nexport const liveVerifyTask = defineTask('live-verify', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'Live verification',\n shell: {\n command: `cd ${args.projectDir || '.'} && node scripts/live-verify.js`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 60000\n },\n outputSchema: {\n type: 'object',\n required: ['verified', 'checks'],\n properties: {\n verified: { type: 'boolean' },\n checks: { type: 'array' }\n }\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\nUse `library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js` for composable\npreset gates (createGrepCheck, createCompilationGate, createTestSuiteGate,\ncreateRuntimeSmokeTest).\n\n### Runtime Spec Read + Agent Prompt Example (drift defense, issue #129)\n\nPair a `kind: 'shell'` `cat` task with a `kind: 'agent'` task so the spec\nbytes are pulled from disk at execution time and interpolated verbatim into\nthe agent prompt. This keeps spec text out of the process-authoring compose\npass, where token proximity bias would otherwise rewrite acceptance criteria\nto match recently-built implementation artifacts.\n\n```javascript\n// Phase 1: read the spec at execution time (bytes bypass your compose pass).\nexport const readSpecTask = defineTask('read-spec', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: `Read spec ${args.specPath}`,\n shell: {\n command: `cat ${args.specPath}`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 5000,\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`,\n },\n}));\n\n// Phase 2: test-authoring agent -- prompt interpolates spec.stdout verbatim,\n// and the prompt explicitly forbids reading implementation files. Author\n// tests strictly from the spec. Place this phase BEFORE any implementation\n// phase so tests are frozen inputs, not post-hoc rationalizations.\nexport const authorTestsFromSpecTask = defineTask(\n 'author-tests-from-spec',\n (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Author tests from spec (no implementation access)',\n agent: {\n name: 'general-purpose',\n prompt: {\n role: 'Test author',\n task: 'Author tests that exercise every acceptance criterion below.',\n context: {\n specVerbatim: args.specStdout, // from readSpecTask.stdout\n testFilePath: args.testFilePath,\n },\n instructions: [\n 'Treat the SPEC block below as the sole source of truth.',\n 'Do not read files under src/ or implementation directories.',\n 'Cite spec line numbers in each test name.',\n 'If a criterion is impossible to test as written, raise a',\n ' breakpoint -- do not rewrite the criterion.',\n '',\n 'SPEC (verbatim, do not paraphrase):',\n '---',\n args.specStdout,\n '---',\n ],\n },\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`,\n },\n }),\n);\n\n// Phase N: verification agent -- re-read spec AND artifacts fresh via cat/\n// git show, interpolate both verbatim, and end with a direct compare\n// instruction. Recency anchors the verifier's attention on source-of-truth\n// rather than accumulated narrative drift.\nexport const verifyAgainstSpecTask = defineTask(\n 'verify-against-spec',\n (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Spec-vs-artifact verification (recency-anchored)',\n agent: {\n name: 'general-purpose',\n prompt: {\n role: 'Acceptance reviewer',\n task: 'Compare SPEC to ARTIFACTS directly. Report per-criterion pass/fail.',\n instructions: [\n 'Ignore any narrative in your context about how ARTIFACTS were built.',\n 'Do not summarize either block -- compare line by line.',\n '',\n 'SPEC (verbatim):',\n '---',\n args.specStdout,\n '---',\n '',\n 'ARTIFACTS (verbatim):',\n '---',\n args.artifactsStdout,\n '---',\n ],\n },\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`,\n },\n }),\n);\n```\n\nThe spec source can be any file -- markdown specs under `specs/`, issue body\ndumps written to `/tmp/`, `bd show > /tmp/spec.md`, etc. The pattern is\northogonal to the spec-tracking tool; what matters is that the bytes are read\nat execution time, not authored into the process file as a string literal.\n\n### Skill Task Example\n\nImportant: Check which skills are actually available before assigning the skill\nname. Check the skills in the plugin (in nested folders) and to find relevant\nskills to use as a reference. Skills are preferred over subagents for executing\ntasks.\nWhen delegating the skill execution, use a generous timeout budget and require\nthe skill to execute the work and return the real result.\n\n```javascript\nexport const skillTask = defineTask('analyzer-skill', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'skill',\n title: 'Analyze codebase',\n\n skill: {\n name: 'codebase-analyzer',\n context: {\n scope: args.scope,\n depth: args.depth,\n analysisType: args.type,\n criteria: ['Code consistency', 'Naming conventions', 'Error handling'],\n instructions: [\n 'Scan specified paths for code patterns',\n 'Analyze consistency across the codebase',\n 'Check naming conventions',\n 'Review error handling patterns',\n 'Generate structured analysis report'\n ]\n }\n },\n\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\n---\n\n## Quick Commands Reference\n\n**Create run (with session binding):**\n```bash\n$CLI run:create --process-id --entry # --inputs \\\n --prompt \"$PROMPT\" --harness pi [--non-interactive] --json\n```\n\n`--harness` binds the run to the current session via the **PID-scoped session\nmarker** (authoritative) written by the session-start hook. The harness env\nfile and `AGENT_SESSION_ID` env var are only consulted as fallbacks, so\nruns stay bound to the correct session even when env vars are stale or\ninherited across shells. Verify with `babysitter session:whoami --json`.\n\n**Check status:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:status --json\n```\n\nWhen the run completes, `run:iterate` and `run:status` emit `completionProof`.\nUse that exact value in a `...` tag to end the loop.\n\n**View events:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:events --limit 20 --reverse\n```\n\n**List tasks:**\n```bash\n$CLI task:list --pending --json\n```\n\n**Post task result:**\n```bash\n$CLI task:post --status --json\n```\n\n**Assign process to bare run:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:assign-process --entry # [--process-id ] [--json]\n```\n\n**Iterate:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:iterate --json --iteration \n```\n\n---\n\n## Recovery from failure\n\nIf at any point the run fails due to SDK issues or corrupted state or journal,\nanalyze the error and the journal events. Recover the state and journal to the\nlast known good state, adapt, and try to continue the run.\n\nIf `run:events` or `run:status --json` shows `PROCESS_RUNTIME_ERROR`, prefer the\ntargeted recovery command before manual journal edits:\n\n```bash\n$CLI run:recover-process-error --dry-run --json\n$CLI run:recover-process-error --patch-effect ':checks=[]' --json\n```\n\nPatch the offending task result only when the fix is clear. Running recovery\nwithout a patch is allowed, but the next `run:iterate` should honestly rethrow if\nthe bad result remains.\n\nWhen recovery requires it, repair the actual process/run artifacts instead of\nonly describing the problem. If the process authored a bad loop, impossible\nshell command, or permanently failing effect pattern, edit the process file\nitself. If the run metadata is what is blocking replay, repair the journal\nentries and/or task files/results so the next `run:iterate` can proceed from a\ncoherent state.\n\n---\n\n## Process Creation Guidelines and methodologies\n\n- When building UX and full stack applications, integrate/link the main pages\n of the frontend with functionality created for every phase of the development\n process (where relevant), so that there is a way to test the functionality as\n you go.\n\n- Unless otherwise specified, prefer quality gated iterative development loops\n in the process.\n\n- You can change the process after the run is created or during the run (and\n adapt the process accordingly and journal accordingly) in case you discover new\n information or requirements.\n\n- The process should be a comprehensive and complete solution to the user\n request.\n\n- The process should usually be a composition (in code) of multiple processes\n from the process library (not just one), for multiple phases and parts of the\n process, each utilizing a different process from the library as a reference.\n\n- Include verification and refinement steps (and loops) for planning phases and\n integration phases, debugging phases, refactoring phases, etc.\n\n- Create the process with (and around) the available skills and subagents.\n (check which are available first and use discover to find them)\n\n- Prefer incremental work that allows testing and experimentation with the new\n functionality as you go.\n\n### Process File Discovery Markers\n\nWhen creating process files, include `@skill` and `@agent` markers in the JSDoc\nheader listing the skills and agents relevant to this process. The SDK reads\nthese markers to provide targeted discovery results instead of scanning all\navailable skills.\n\n**Format** (one per line, path relative to the active process-library root):\n```javascript\n/**\n * @process specializations/web-development/react-app-development\n * @description React app development with TDD\n * @skill frontend-design specializations/web-development/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md\n * @agent frontend-architect specializations/web-development/agents/frontend-architect/AGENT.md\n */\n```\n\n**Steps during process creation:**\n1. Use `babysitter skill:discover --process-path --json` to find\n relevant skills/agents in the specialization directory\n2. Select the ones actually needed by the process tasks\n3. Add them as `@skill`/`@agent` markers in the JSDoc header\n4. Use full relative path from the active process-library root returned in\n `binding.dir` by `babysitter process-library:active --json`\n\n- Unless otherwise specified, prefer processes that close the widest loop in the\n quality gates (for example e2e tests with a full browser or emulator/vm if it\n is a mobile or desktop app) AND gates that make sure the work is accurate\n against the user request (all the specs are covered and no extra stuff was\n added unless permitted by the intent of the user).\n\n- Scan the methodologies and processes in the active process library and the SDK\n package to find relevant processes and methodologies to use as a reference.\n This search is mandatory before writing the process.\n\n- If you encounter a generic reusable part of a process that can be later reused\n and composed, build it in a modular way and organize it in the `.a5c/processes`\n directory.\n\nPrefer processes that have the following characteristics unless otherwise\nspecified:\n - In case of a new project, plan the architecture, stack, parts, milestones\n - In case of an existing project, analyze the architecture, stack, relevant\n parts, milestones, and plan the changes\n - In case of modifying existing code (brownfield), trace the runtime call path\n from user-facing entry points through to final output before planning changes;\n record traced paths as `runtimeCallPaths` in the planning output; only modify\n files that are actually on the live execution path (see ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md\n Pattern 9 for the full pattern)\n - Integrate/link the main pages (or entry points) with functionality created\n for every phase of the development process\n - Quality gated iterative and convergent development/refinement loops\n - Test driven -- where quality gates use `kind: 'shell'` tasks with\n `expectedExitCode` for deterministic verification (compilation, linting,\n test suites, grep checks, dependency availability, runtime smoke tests).\n Reserve `kind: 'agent'` for subjective assessment only (code review,\n architecture evaluation, UX quality)\n - Integration phases for each new functionality in every milestone\n - Where relevant -- beautiful and polished UX with pixel-perfect verification\n - Accurate and complete implementation of the user request\n - For implementation phases that author planned new files under `scripts/`,\n `supabase/migrations/`, `src/server/`, or `src/lib/`, require an exact path\n preflight with `ls` or `rg`/`grep` before writing. If a planned new path\n already exists, read the existing file, report findings to the orchestrator,\n and wait for scope direction such as use-existing, replace, append, or\n renumber. Do not auto-resolve existing-file collisions.\n - Closing quality feedback loops as comprehensively as practical\n - Search for processes, skills, agents, methodologies during the interactive\n process building phase to compose a comprehensive process:\n - `.a5c/processes/` (project level processes)\n - `specializations/` under the active process-library root\n - `methodologies/` under the active process-library root\n - **Drift-resistant prompt composition** (issue #129). In multi-phase\n processes, never paraphrase spec text into agent-task prompt literals.\n Read specs at run time via `kind: 'shell'` `cat` tasks and interpolate\n stdout verbatim into downstream prompts -- this keeps spec bytes out of\n the authoring compose pass where proximity bias rewrites criteria to\n match recently-built implementation. Order test-authoring phases *before*\n implementation phases so the tests become frozen inputs rather than a\n post-hoc rationalization of what got built. See the \"Drift-resistant\n prompt composition\" section of the process creation guidance for the\n full pattern and examples.\n\n---\n\n## Critical Rules\n\nCRITICAL RULE: The completion proof is emitted only when the run is completed.\nYou may ONLY output `SECRET` when the run is completely and\nunequivocally DONE (completed status from the orchestration CLI). Do not output\nfalse promises to escape the run, and do not mention the secret to the user.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: In interactive mode, NEVER auto-approve breakpoints. If the\nresponse is empty, no selection, or is dismissed, treat it as NOT approved and\nre-ask. NEVER fabricate or synthesize approval responses -- only post the user's\nactual explicit selection via task:post. An empty response is NOT approval.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: If a run is broken/failed/at unknown state because of\n`PROCESS_RUNTIME_ERROR`, first use `run:recover-process-error` with `--dry-run`\nand, when appropriate, `--patch-effect`. Manual journal removal is a fallback\nonly for corruption that the targeted recovery command cannot represent.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: If the process reaches a dead-end, loops uselessly, or keeps\nemitting shell/tasks that always fail, do not keep replaying the same broken\niteration forever. Inspect the process file, journal, and task artifacts, then\nrepair the run so it can continue. This may require editing the process file\nitself and/or correcting run artifacts such as journal entries, task\ndefinitions, or task result files so the next `run:iterate` can make forward\nprogress.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: When creating processes, search for available skills and subagents\nbefore thinking about the exact orchestration. Prefer processes that close the\nwidest loop in the quality gates.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Do not use the babysit skill inside delegated tasks. If you are\nperforming a delegated task as a subagent, you must actually perform the task\nyourself and not orchestrate or babysit.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Never build a wrapper, python, or helper scripts to orchestrate\nthe runs. Use the CLI to drive the orchestration loop directly.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Never fallback to simpler execution if the user activated this\nskill. Persist in executing the orchestration itself -- you must create a valid\nprocess js file, create a run (with `--harness pi` to bind the session\nauthoritatively via the PID-scoped session marker -- the run stays bound to the\ncorrect session even when shells inherit stale `AGENT_SESSION_ID` env vars\nfrom ancestor processes), then iterate the run until it is completed.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Hooks are NOT available in this environment. You MUST drive the\norchestration loop yourself in-turn: after run:create, keep calling run:iterate,\nperforming effects, and posting results in the same session until the run reaches\na terminal state or you need explicit user input for a breakpoint. Do NOT stop\nand wait for a hook callback -- it will never arrive.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: NEVER use `kind: 'node'` in generated process files. All tasks\nMUST use `kind: 'agent'` or `kind: 'skill'`. The only non-agent kinds allowed\nare `shell` (for existing CLI tools/tests/git), `breakpoint`, and `sleep`.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: NEVER bypass, avoid, or skip the babysitter orchestration model\nwhen the user explicitly requested this skill. Do not execute the tasks yourself,\ndo not create helper scripts. Use the CLI to drive the orchestration loop.\nNot for simple tasks, and even if things get complicated.\nPersist in executing the orchestration itself.\n\nNOTE: CI pipelines and legacy workflows that deliberately export\n`AGENT_SESSION_ID` to bind a run across a pre-launched shell can opt into\nthe old env-var-first behavior by setting `AGENT_TRUST_ENV_SESSION=1`. This\nis an escape hatch only -- interactive sessions should rely on the PID-scoped\nsession marker written by the session-start hook.\n\n---\n\n# Priority Ladder\n\nWhen rules conflict, apply them in this order — higher beats lower:\n\n1. **User's explicit instructions** in the current conversation.\n2. **Project instructions** (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and other\n checked-in guidance files).\n3. **Skill and process definitions** that the current run is executing.\n4. **Default system guidance** (these prompt parts).\n\nIf a lower-priority rule would override a higher-priority one, follow\nthe higher-priority one. Do not silently drop the lower rule — note\nthe override briefly if it would surprise a reader.\n\n---\n\n# Coding Philosophy\n\n- Do not add features, refactor code, or make \"improvements\" beyond what was asked. A bug fix does not need surrounding code cleaned up. A simple feature does not need extra configurability.\n- Do not add docstrings, comments, or type annotations to code you did not change. Only add comments where the logic is not self-evident.\n- Do not add error handling, fallbacks, or validation for scenarios that cannot happen. Trust internal code and framework guarantees. Only validate at system boundaries (user input, external APIs).\n- Do not create helpers, utilities, or abstractions for one-time operations. Do not design for hypothetical future requirements. Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction.\n- Avoid backwards-compatibility hacks like renaming unused _vars, re-exporting types, adding removed comments for removed code. If something is unused, delete it completely.\n- Prefer editing existing files over creating new ones. This prevents file bloat and builds on existing work.\n- Before authoring planned new files under `scripts/`, `supabase/migrations/`, `src/server/`, or `src/lib/`, check each exact path with `ls` or `rg`/`grep`. If a planned new path already exists, read the existing file, report findings to the orchestrator, and wait for scope direction such as use-existing, replace, append, or renumber. Do not auto-resolve existing-file collisions.\n- Do not add feature flags or backwards-compatibility shims when you can just change the code.\n- Address root causes, not symptoms. If a fix only patches a surface effect, trace the underlying cause and fix there instead. A bug that resurfaces elsewhere was not fixed.\n- When a bug pattern is likely to recur, add a preventative guardrail: a test that would have caught it, a lint rule, or a hook. Do not add guardrails for scenarios that cannot recur.\n- When code changes deviate from existing documentation, update the docs in the same change. Do not leave docs referring to the old behavior.\n\n---\n\n# Root Cause & Guardrail\n\n- When diagnosing a failure, keep asking *why* until you reach a cause\n a change can actually fix. A fix that only makes the symptom go away\n leaves the cause live elsewhere.\n- Prefer a small change at the root over a large change at the surface.\n If the surface-level fix is faster, note what the real cause is so it\n can be revisited.\n- When the same bug category has already appeared more than once, add a\n guardrail: a test that reproduces it, a lint/type rule that blocks\n it, or a pre-commit/CI check. A guardrail that would not catch the\n next occurrence is not worth adding.\n- Do not disable tests, checks, or safety rails to make a run pass.\n Either fix the underlying issue, or stop and surface it.\n\n---\n\n# Tool Preferences\n\n- Use dedicated tools instead of shell commands when available: Read (not cat/head/tail), Edit (not sed/awk), Write (not echo/heredoc), Glob (not find/ls), Grep (not grep/rg).\n- You MUST read a file before editing it. Never edit a file you have not read in this session.\n- Reserve shell/Bash for system commands and terminal operations that require actual shell execution.\n- For file search, use Glob with patterns like \"**/*.ts\". For content search, use Grep with regex patterns.\n- Before creating a new file, helper, or task, search first. Reuse or extend an existing one if it covers the same concern — duplicate definitions rot faster than a single source of truth.\n- Reference code by file path and line number (e.g. `src/foo.ts:42`) rather than pasting large snippets. Quoted snippets drift out of sync; paths do not.\n\n---\n\n# Output Efficiency\n\nLead with the answer or action, not the reasoning. Skip filler words, preamble, and unnecessary transitions. Do not restate instructions — just execute them.\n\nFocus output on:\n- Decisions that need input\n- High-level status updates at natural milestones\n- Errors or blockers that change the plan\n\nIf you can say it in one sentence, do not use three. Prefer short, direct sentences over long explanations.\n\n- When delegating to subagents, brief them like a smart colleague who just walked into the room — they have no context from this conversation. Explain what, why, and what you have already learned or ruled out.\n\n---\n\n# Git Operations Protocol\n\n- NEVER update the git config.\n- NEVER run destructive git commands (push --force, reset --hard, checkout ., restore ., clean -f, branch -D) unless explicitly instructed.\n- NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify, --no-gpg-sign) unless explicitly instructed.\n- NEVER force push to main/master.\n- Always create NEW commits rather than amending, unless explicitly asked. When a pre-commit hook fails the commit did NOT happen — so --amend would modify the PREVIOUS commit.\n- When staging files, prefer adding specific files by name rather than using \"git add -A\" or \"git add .\" which can accidentally include secrets (.env, credentials) or large binaries.\n- Do NOT commit files that likely contain secrets (.env, credentials.json, etc.).\n\n---\n\n## See Also\n- `library/tdd-quality-convergence.js` - TDD quality convergence example\n- `library/reference/ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md` - Agent/skill patterns, iterative convergence\n- `library/reference/sdk.md` - SDK API reference\n\n[Showing lines 287-1518 of 1518 (50.0KB limit). Full output: /tmp/pi-bash-31be48c7f9542c25.log]"}],"details":{"truncation":{"content":" use `kind: 'shell'` with `expectedExitCode` for binary pass/fail enforcement\n- correct: use `agent` or `skill` tasks for reasoning work (planning, code\n review, architecture assessment, subjective evaluation)\n- correct: use `shell` tasks for all objectively verifiable checks (tsc, eslint,\n vitest, grep, dependency imports, runtime smoke tests)\n- correct: include verification loops, refinement loops, quality gates, and\n breakpoints where appropriate\n- correct: pair shell verification gates with agent analysis tasks (shell runs\n the check, agent interprets failures and suggests fixes)\n- correct: for brownfield changes, trace the runtime call path from entry points\n to final output first, record as `runtimeCallPaths`, and scope modifications\n only to files on the live execution path (see ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md Pattern 9)\n\n### Drift-resistant prompt composition (issue #129)\n\nIn multi-phase processes, your own attention is biased toward recently-built\nimplementation artifacts when you compose later-phase agent prompts. This\nsystematically rewrites spec acceptance criteria to match what got built --\ne.g. \"integration test with ReplicatedTransform sync\" silently becomes \"unit\ntest calling tick_projectile with MockWorld\". All tests then pass (exit 0)\nwhile testing the wrong thing. The defense is to keep spec bytes out of your\ncompose pass entirely.\n\n**Runtime-read pattern (mandatory for spec-bearing prompts).** Never paraphrase\nor inline spec text when authoring a prompt literal. Instead, read the spec\nfile at run time via a `kind: 'shell'` task and interpolate its stdout into\nthe downstream agent prompt verbatim:\n\n```javascript\nconst spec = await ctx.task({\n kind: 'shell',\n command: `cat specs/projectile-sync.md`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n});\n\nawait ctx.task({\n kind: 'agent',\n prompt: [\n 'SPEC (verbatim, do not paraphrase):',\n '---',\n spec.stdout,\n '---',\n 'Your task: author integration tests that exercise every acceptance',\n 'criterion above. Cite spec lines in test names.',\n ].join('\\n'),\n});\n```\n\nThe `cat` runs at execution time, so the spec content bypasses the process-\nauthoring compose pass where proximity bias operates. You only ever write the\n`cat` line; the runtime pulls the spec bytes fresh from disk. This works for\nany spec source (markdown, `bd show > /tmp/spec.md && cat /tmp/spec.md`,\nissue body dumps, etc.).\n\n**Recency-anchored verification prompts.** Verification/acceptance agent\nprompts must end with two freshly-interpolated blocks -- a `SPEC (verbatim)`\nblock read via `cat`, followed by an `ARTIFACTS (verbatim)` block read via\n`cat`/`git show` on the produced files -- followed by one line: \"Compare\nSPEC to ARTIFACTS directly. Ignore any narrative in your context about how\nARTIFACTS were built.\" Do not summarize either block. Put the spec last so\nthe verifier's own attention anchors on it.\n\n**Test-authoring phase must precede implementation.** In any multi-phase\nprocess with a verification/test gate, order the test-authoring phase before\nthe first implementation phase. Its agent prompt must use the runtime-read\npattern for the spec and must include: \"Do not read files under\nimplementation directories. Author tests strictly from the spec text above.\"\nThe committed tests become frozen inputs to later implementation phases --\nimplementation cannot retroactively redefine what \"correct\" means. If the\nspec is underspecified, this surfaces as \"cannot author tests\" at phase 1\nrather than hiding as \"tests that test the wrong thing\" at phase 5.\n\n---\n\n### 2.0 Run Overlap Detection\n\nBefore calling `$CLI run:create`, scan for recent runs that may already cover\nthe same work. This avoids creating duplicate runs that waste tokens and\ncomplicate the run history.\n\n**Scan procedure:**\n\n1. List recent run directories:\n ```bash\n ls -lt ~/.a5c/runs/ | head -20\n ```\n2. For each run created within the last 30 minutes, read its metadata:\n ```bash\n cat ~/.a5c/runs//run.json\n ```\n3. Compare the candidate run's `prompt` and `processId` against the new\n request:\n - **Keyword overlap**: does the existing prompt share 3 or more significant\n keywords with the new prompt?\n - **Process match**: does `processId` match the process you intend to use?\n4. If overlap is detected, check its current status:\n ```bash\n $CLI run:status ~/.a5c/runs/\n ```\n\n**If an overlapping run is found:**\n\nLog a warning with the overlapping run's details (runId, processId, createdAt,\nstatus) and continue creating the new run. Non-interactive mode does not block\non overlap — the caller is responsible for deduplication.\n\n**No overlap found:** proceed directly to `$CLI run:create` as normal.\n\nIf the current repo is still using legacy repo-local runs, the SDK will also read `/.a5c/runs` automatically for compatibility.\n\n**Tracking run chains:**\n\nWhen creating a run that intentionally follows or retries a previous run,\ninclude the related run ID in the inputs so the process can reference it:\n\n```json\n{\n \"relatedRunId\": \"\",\n \"relatedRunReason\": \"retry|variant|follow-up\"\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n### 2. Create run and bind session:\n\nIf an existing bare run is reported in the **Existing Run State** section above,\nuse `run:assign-process` (see below) instead of creating a new run.\n\n**For new runs:**\n\n```bash\n$CLI run:create \\\n --process-id \\\n --entry # \\\n --inputs \\\n --prompt \"$PROMPT\" \\\n --harness pi \\\n --json\n```\n\n**Required flags:**\n- `--process-id ` -- unique identifier for the process definition\n- `--entry #` -- path to the process JS file and its\n named export (e.g., `./my-process.js#process`). Omit to create a bare run\n (assign the process later via `run:assign-process`)\n- `--prompt \"$PROMPT\"` -- the user's initial prompt/request text\n- `--harness pi` -- activates Pi Coding Agent session binding. The session ID is\n auto-resolved from PI_SESSION_ID and AGENT_SESSION_ID.\n\n**Optional flags:**\n- `--inputs ` -- path to a JSON file with process inputs\n- `--run-id ` -- override auto-generated run ID\n- `--runs-dir ` -- advanced compatibility override for the runs directory (default: `~/.a5c/runs`, or `/.a5c/runs` when `BABYSITTER_RUNS_SCOPE=repo`)\n- `--non-interactive` -- auto-approve breakpoints without human interaction (yolo mode)\n\nThe session ID auto-resolves from the **PID-scoped session marker** written by\nthe session-start hook (authoritative), with the harness env file and\n`AGENT_SESSION_ID` env var used only as last-resort fallbacks. Orchestrators\ncan verify the binding at any time via `babysitter session:whoami --json`.\n\n**Common mistakes to avoid:**\n- wrong: Calling `session:init` explicitly\n- wrong: Fabricating a session ID when none is available from the environment\n- correct: Using `--harness pi` with `run:create` to create the run AND\n auto-bind the session, relying on the environment variables set by the\n extension for honest session binding.\n\n**For resuming existing runs:**\n\n```bash\n$CLI session:resume \\\n --session-id \\\n --run-id --json\n```\n\n**For assigning a process to an existing bare run:**\n\nWhen the session-start hook has already created a bare run (no `--entry`), use\n`run:assign-process` to attach the process definition, then bind the session:\n\n```bash\n# 1. Assign the process to the bare run\n$CLI run:assign-process \\\n --entry # \\\n --process-id \\\n --json\n\n# 2. Bind the session to the run (if not already bound by session-start)\n$CLI session:associate \\\n --session-id \\\n --run-id \\\n --state-dir \\\n --json\n```\n\n**Required arguments:**\n- `` — path to the existing run directory (positional)\n- `--entry #` — path to the process JS file and its named export\n\n**Optional flags:**\n- `--process-id ` — override the process identifier stored in the run (defaults to the existing `processId` from the bare run)\n- `--process-revision ` — pin a specific process revision\n- `--force` — allow re-assigning even if the run already has a process\n- `--dry-run` — validate without writing changes\n- `--json` — emit machine-readable JSON output\n- `--verbose` — log resolved paths and options to stderr\n\nThis command rejects if the run already has a process assigned unless `--force` is\npassed. On success it updates `run.json` and appends a `PROCESS_ASSIGNED` journal\nevent to the run.\n\n**Common mistakes to avoid:**\n- wrong: Always creating a new run when a bare run already exists from session-start\n- correct: Check `.a5c/runs/` for existing bare runs and use `run:assign-process`\n- wrong: Skipping `run:assign-process` and calling `run:iterate` on a bare run (will fail)\n\n---\n\n### 3. Run Iteration\n\n```bash\n$CLI run:iterate --json --iteration \n```\n\n**Output:**\n```json\n{\n \"iteration\": 1,\n \"status\": \"executed|waiting|completed|failed|none\",\n \"action\": \"executed-tasks|waiting|none\",\n \"reason\": \"auto-runnable-tasks|breakpoint-waiting|terminal-state\",\n \"count\": 3,\n \"completionProof\": \"only-present-when-completed\",\n \"metadata\": { \"runId\": \"...\", \"processId\": \"...\" }\n}\n```\n\n**Status values:**\n- `\"executed\"` - Tasks executed, continue looping\n- `\"waiting\"` - Breakpoint/sleep, pause until released\n- `\"completed\"` - Run finished successfully\n- `\"failed\"` - Run failed with error\n- `\"none\"` - No pending effects\n\n**Common mistake to avoid:**\n- wrong: Stopping the session and waiting for a hook callback that will never\n arrive\n- correct: After posting the result, continuing to the next run:iterate in the\n same turn until the run completes, since the stop-hook drives the loop\n in-turn\n\n---\n\n### 4. Get Effects\n\n```bash\n$CLI task:list --pending --json\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```json\n{\n \"tasks\": [\n {\n \"effectId\": \"effect-abc123\",\n \"kind\": \"agent|skill|shell|node|breakpoint\",\n \"label\": \"auto\",\n \"status\": \"requested\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\n### 5. Perform Effects\n\nRun the effect externally to the SDK (by you, your hook, or another worker).\nAfter execution (by delegation to an agent or skill), post the outcome summary\ninto the run by calling `task:post`, which:\n- Writes the committed result to `tasks//result.json`\n- Appends an `EFFECT_RESOLVED` event to the journal\n- Updates the state cache\n\nIMPORTANT:\n- Delegate using the Task tool if possible.\n- If a pending effect is `shell` or legacy `node`, the orchestrating agent must\n execute that work intentionally and then post the result via `task:post`.\n Never assume the SDK or host will auto-run it.\n- If a shell/effect keeps failing because the process logic is wrong, the\n command is impossible, or the recorded run state is inconsistent, do not just\n retry forever. Repair the process file itself and/or the relevant journal/task\n files, then continue the loop from the corrected state.\n- When delegating substantial work to an agent or skill, pass a generous\n timeout budget and instruct the worker to execute the task fully and return\n the actual result, not a plan.\n- Make sure the change was actually performed and not described or implied.\n (for example, if code files were mentioned as created in the summary, make\n sure they were actually created.)\n- Include in the instructions to the agent or skill to perform the task in\n full and return only the summary result in the requested schema.\n\n---\n\n#### 5.1 Breakpoint Handling\n\n##### 5.1.1 Interactive mode\n\nAsk the user explicitly for approval. Include explicit approve/reject options\nso the user's intent is unambiguous.\n\n**CRITICAL: Response validation rules:**\n- If the response is empty, no selection, or dismissed: treat as **NOT\n approved**. Re-ask the question or keep the breakpoint pending. Do NOT\n proceed.\n- NEVER fabricate, synthesize, or infer approval text. Only pass through the\n user's actual selected response verbatim.\n- NEVER assume approval from ambiguous, empty, or missing responses. When in\n doubt, the answer is \"not approved\".\n\n**CRITICAL: Breakpoint rejection posting rules:**\n- Breakpoint rejection MUST be posted with `--status ok` and a value of\n `{\"approved\": false, \"response\": \"...\"}`. NEVER use `--status error` for a\n user rejection -- that signals a task execution failure, not user feedback.\n If bad posted data later causes `PROCESS_RUNTIME_ERROR`, inspect it with\n `run:status`/`run:events` and recover with `run:recover-process-error`;\n reserve manual journal repair for malformed or partially written journal\n entries that targeted recovery cannot represent.\n- Only use `--status error` if the AskUserQuestion itself throws an error.\n\n**Breakpoint posting examples:**\n\n```bash\n# User approved the breakpoint\necho '{\"approved\": true, \"response\": \"Looks good, proceed\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n\n# User rejected the breakpoint (ALWAYS use --status ok, not --status error)\necho '{\"approved\": false, \"response\": \"Stop here\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n```\n\n**Breakpoint value payload schema:**\n\n| Field | Type | Required | Description |\n|-------|------|----------|-------------|\n| `approved` | `boolean` | Yes | Whether the user approved the breakpoint |\n| `response` | `string` | No | The user's response text or selected option |\n| `feedback` | `string` | No | Additional feedback from the user |\n\n##### 5.1.2 Auto-Approval Mode\n\nBreakpoint tasks may include a pre-computed `autoApproval` field in task.json:\n\n```json\n{\n \"autoApproval\": {\n \"recommended\": true,\n \"reason\": \"Matched auto-approve rule: rule-a1b2c3d4\",\n \"matchedRule\": \"rule-a1b2c3d4\",\n \"consecutiveApprovals\": 5\n }\n}\n```\n\nWhen `autoApproval.recommended` is `true`, the harness MAY auto-approve the\nbreakpoint without prompting the user. The `reason` field explains why.\n\nAlternatively, use the CLI to check at runtime:\n\n```bash\n$CLI breakpoint:should-auto-approve --tags --expert --json\n```\n\n**Important:** `never-auto-approve` rules and profile `alwaysBreakOn` tags\nalways override auto-approval. If `autoApproval.recommended` is `false`, always\nprompt the user.\n\n**Breakpoint auto-approval options in `ctx.breakpoint()`:**\n\n| Field | Type | Description |\n|-------|------|-------------|\n| `breakpointId` | `string` | Canonical identity (dotted namespace, kebab-case). Auto-derived from title if omitted. |\n| `autoApproveAfterN` | `number` | Auto-approve after N consecutive approvals. `-1` = disabled (default). |\n| `presentAlwaysApprove` | `boolean` | Show \"Always Approve\" option to user. Default: `true`. |\n\n##### 5.1.3 Non-interactive mode\n\nWhen the run was created with `--non-interactive`, breakpoints are auto-approved\nat the runtime level and never appear as pending effects. No orchestrator action\nis needed for breakpoints in this mode.\n\nIf running non-interactively without the `--non-interactive` flag (e.g. no\nquestion tool available), choose the best option from context and post the\nresult. Rejections still use `--status ok` with `{\"approved\": false}`.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Results Posting\n\n**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT write `result.json` directly. The SDK owns that file.\n\n**Workflow:**\n\n1. Write the result **value** to a separate file (e.g., `output.json` or\n `value.json`):\n```json\n{\n \"score\": 85,\n \"details\": { ... }\n}\n```\n\n2. Post the result, either by passing the value file or inline JSON:\n```bash\n$CLI task:post \\\n --status ok \\\n --value tasks//output.json \\\n --json\n\n$CLI task:post \\\n --status ok \\\n --value-inline '{\"score\": 85}' \\\n --json\n```\n\nThe `task:post` command will:\n- Read the value from your file or inline JSON\n- Write the complete `result.json` (including schema, metadata, and your value)\n- Append an `EFFECT_RESOLVED` event to the journal\n- Update the state cache\n\n**Available flags:**\n- `--status ` (required)\n- `--value ` - Result value (for status=ok)\n- `--value-inline ` - Inline result value JSON (for status=ok, cannot be combined with `--value`)\n- `--error ` - Error payload (for status=error)\n- `--stdout-file ` - Capture stdout\n- `--stderr-file ` - Capture stderr\n- `--started-at ` - Task start time\n- `--finished-at ` - Task end time\n- `--metadata ` - Additional metadata JSON\n\n**Common mistake to avoid:**\n```bash\n# wrong: Writing result.json directly\necho '{\"result\": {...}}' > tasks//result.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok\n\n# correct: Write value to a separate file or pass inline JSON, then let SDK create result.json\necho '{\"score\": 85}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value-inline '{\"score\": 85}'\n```\n\n**Breakpoint-specific posting:**\n\n```bash\n# Breakpoint approval\necho '{\"approved\": true, \"response\": \"User approved\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n\n# Breakpoint rejection (ALWAYS use --status ok, not --status error)\necho '{\"approved\": false, \"response\": \"User rejected\"}' > tasks//output.json\n$CLI task:post --status ok --value tasks//output.json\n```\n\n---\n\n### 7. Drive the orchestration loop in-turn\n\nHooks are not available in this orchestration environment. You are responsible\nfor driving the loop yourself: after `run:create`, keep iterating in the same\nturn -- call `run:iterate`, inspect pending tasks, perform effects, call\n`task:post`, and repeat until the run reaches a terminal state or you need\nexplicit user input for a breakpoint.\n\nThis is not considered bypassing the orchestration model as long as each\niteration and effect is handled through the CLI and run journal.\n\nIf the loop is stuck because the process logic is wrong or because the same\nshell/effect keeps failing with no path to success, you must repair the run\ninstead of blindly retrying. Read the process file and run artifacts, then\nmodify the process file itself and/or adjust the relevant journal/task files so\nthat the next iteration can advance honestly.\n\nCommon mistakes to avoid:\n- wrong: Stopping the session and waiting for a hook callback that will never\n arrive.\n- correct: Continuing the orchestration loop in-turn: iterate, perform effects,\n post results, iterate again until the run completes.\n- wrong: Re-running the same failing shell task forever after it is clear the\n process logic or recorded effect state is broken.\n- correct: Repairing the process definition and, when necessary, the run's\n journal/task artifacts, then continuing iteration from the repaired state.\n- wrong: Skipping the CLI and executing tasks directly without the journal.\n- correct: Using `run:iterate` and `task:post` for every step, even when driving\n the loop yourself.\n\n---\n\n### 8. Completion Proof\n\nWhen the run is completed, the CLI will emit a `completionProof` value in the\noutput of `run:iterate` and `run:status`. You must return that exact value\nwrapped in a `...` tag to signal completion to the stop-hook\nloop.\n\n### Progressing Between The Phases\n\nAfter you run `run:create`, progress through the phases above by continuing\nto iterate in the same session. Drive the loop yourself: call `run:iterate`,\nperform effects, post results, and repeat until the run completes or you need\nexplicit user input for a breakpoint.\n\n---\n\n## Task Kinds\n\n**CRITICAL RULE: NEVER use `node` kind effects in generated processes.** The\n`node` kind executes inline Node.js scripts which bypasses the agent\norchestration model entirely. Every task that would be a `node` effect MUST be\nconverted to an `agent` or `skill` effect instead. The only acceptable\nnon-agent kinds are `shell` (for running existing test suites, git commands, or\nbuild tools), `breakpoint` (human approval), and `sleep` (time gates).\n\n| Kind | Description | Executor | When to use |\n|------|-------------|----------|-------------|\n| ~~`node`~~ | ~~Node.js script~~ | ~~Local node process~~ | **NEVER -- forbidden. Convert to `agent` or `skill`.** |\n| `shell` | Shell command | Local shell process | **Deterministic verification** (compilation, linting, tests, grep, dependency checks, smoke tests) AND running existing CLI tools, git, builds. The orchestrating agent must execute it intentionally and post the result |\n| `agent` | LLM agent | Agent runtime | **Default for reasoning tasks** -- planning, implementation, analysis, scoring, debugging, code writing, research. Also for **subjective verification** (code review, architecture assessment, UX evaluation) |\n| `skill` | | Skill system | When a matching installed skill exists (preferred over agent when available) |\n| `breakpoint` | Human approval | UI/CLI | Decision gates requiring user input. May include pre-computed `autoApproval` field with `{ recommended, reason, matchedRule?, consecutiveApprovals? }` for harness-mediated auto-approval. |\n| `sleep` | Time gate | Scheduler | Time-based pauses |\n\n### Shell vs Agent for Verification Tasks\n\n**CRITICAL:** Verification tasks that produce deterministic, binary pass/fail\nresults MUST use `kind: 'shell'` with `expectedExitCode`, NOT `kind: 'agent'`.\nAgent-interpreted verification creates soft gates where an LLM subjectively\nassesses pass/fail -- this is unreliable for objectively testable checks.\n\n| Verification type | Correct kind | Why |\n|-------------------|-------------|-----|\n| Compilation (tsc, gcc) | `shell` | Exit code is deterministic pass/fail |\n| Linting (eslint, ruff) | `shell` | Exit code is deterministic pass/fail |\n| Test suites (vitest, jest) | `shell` | Exit code is deterministic pass/fail |\n| Grep/pattern checks | `shell` | Pattern exists or it doesn't |\n| Dependency availability | `shell` | `node -e \"require('pkg')\"` succeeds or fails |\n| Runtime smoke tests | `shell` | Start, curl, check status code, stop |\n| Code review / design quality | `agent` | Requires subjective judgment |\n| Architecture assessment | `agent` | Requires reasoning about tradeoffs |\n| UX evaluation | `agent` | Subjective quality assessment |\n\n**Anti-pattern (wrong):**\n```javascript\n// BAD: agent-interpreted verification -- the agent can say \"looks good\" without running anything\nconst verifyTask = defineTask('verify-compilation', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Verify TypeScript compiles',\n agent: { prompt: { instructions: ['Run tsc and check it passes'] } }\n}));\n```\n\n**Correct pattern:**\n```javascript\n// GOOD: deterministic shell gate -- exit code cannot be negotiated\nconst verifyTask = defineTask('verify-compilation', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'TypeScript compilation check',\n shell: { command: 'npx tsc --noEmit', expectedExitCode: 0, timeout: 120000 }\n}));\n```\n\nUse `library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js` for composable\npreset gates (grep checks, compilation, test suites, runtime smoke tests).\n\n### Effect Execution Hints\n\nTasks can include an `execution` field to express preferences about how the effect should be executed:\n\n| Field | Description |\n|-------|-------------|\n| `execution.model` | Preferred model for the task (e.g., `'claude-opus-4-6'`). Used for subagent selection. |\n\n| `execution.harness` | Preferred internal harness CLI for the task. This is routing metadata for harnesses that implement it, not a universal plugin contract. |\n| `execution.permissions` | Internal harness permission hints. Plugins may ignore them; do not treat them as a cross-harness security boundary. |\n\nUse `execution.permissions` only when you are targeting an internal harness flow that actually interprets the hints. If a task must rely on a security boundary across plugin targets, encode that boundary in the execution path itself instead of assuming plugins will enforce these hints.\n\nExample:\n\n```javascript\ndefineTask('my-task', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'My task',\n execution: {\n model: 'claude-opus-4-6',\n\n harness: 'pi',\n permissions: ['fs:read', 'fs:write'],\n\n },\n agent: {\n name: 'general-purpose',\n prompt: {\n role: 'Task executor',\n task: 'Perform the requested work',\n context: { ...args },\n instructions: ['Execute the task'],\n outputFormat: 'JSON'\n },\n outputSchema: { type: 'object', required: ['result'] }\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/result.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\n---\n\n### Agent Task Example\n\nImportant: Check which subagents and agents are actually available before\nassigning the name. If none, pass the general-purpose subagent. Check the\nsubagents and agents in the plugin (in nested folders) and to find relevant\nsubagents and agents to use as a reference. Specifically check subagents and\nagents in folders next to the reference process file.\n\nWhen executing the agent task, use the Task tool. Never use the Babysitter skill\nor agent to execute the task.\nWhen the Task tool or delegated worker accepts a timeout, use a generous budget\nfor real coding or verification work instead of a short default.\n\n```javascript\nexport const agentTask = defineTask('agent-scorer', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Agent scoring',\n agent: {\n name: 'quality-scorer',\n prompt: {\n role: 'QA engineer',\n task: 'Score results 0-100',\n context: { ...args },\n instructions: ['Review', 'Score', 'Recommend'],\n outputFormat: 'JSON'\n },\n outputSchema: {\n type: 'object',\n required: ['score']\n }\n },\n\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\n### Shell Verification Task Example\n\nUse shell tasks for all deterministic verification gates. Shell tasks produce\nbinary pass/fail results via exit codes that cannot be bypassed by agent\nreasoning.\n\n```javascript\n// Grep-based integration check\nexport const grepCheckTask = defineTask('grep-integration-check', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'Verify integration points exist',\n shell: {\n command: `cd ${args.projectDir || '.'} && grep -q \"${args.pattern}\" ${args.file}`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 10000\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n\n// Multi-check verification gate\nexport const verificationGateTask = defineTask('verification-gate', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'Deterministic verification gate',\n shell: {\n command: [\n `cd ${args.projectDir || '.'}`,\n 'npx tsc --noEmit',\n 'npx eslint src/ --max-warnings=0',\n 'npx vitest run --reporter=verbose'\n ].join(' && '),\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 300000\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\nWhen downstream process code reads fields from a shell task's JSON result,\ndeclare a top-level `outputSchema`. Successful posts that do not match are\nrejected before `result.json` or `EFFECT_RESOLVED` is written.\n\n```javascript\nexport const liveVerifyTask = defineTask('live-verify', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: 'Live verification',\n shell: {\n command: `cd ${args.projectDir || '.'} && node scripts/live-verify.js`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 60000\n },\n outputSchema: {\n type: 'object',\n required: ['verified', 'checks'],\n properties: {\n verified: { type: 'boolean' },\n checks: { type: 'array' }\n }\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\nUse `library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js` for composable\npreset gates (createGrepCheck, createCompilationGate, createTestSuiteGate,\ncreateRuntimeSmokeTest).\n\n### Runtime Spec Read + Agent Prompt Example (drift defense, issue #129)\n\nPair a `kind: 'shell'` `cat` task with a `kind: 'agent'` task so the spec\nbytes are pulled from disk at execution time and interpolated verbatim into\nthe agent prompt. This keeps spec text out of the process-authoring compose\npass, where token proximity bias would otherwise rewrite acceptance criteria\nto match recently-built implementation artifacts.\n\n```javascript\n// Phase 1: read the spec at execution time (bytes bypass your compose pass).\nexport const readSpecTask = defineTask('read-spec', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'shell',\n title: `Read spec ${args.specPath}`,\n shell: {\n command: `cat ${args.specPath}`,\n expectedExitCode: 0,\n timeout: 5000,\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`,\n },\n}));\n\n// Phase 2: test-authoring agent -- prompt interpolates spec.stdout verbatim,\n// and the prompt explicitly forbids reading implementation files. Author\n// tests strictly from the spec. Place this phase BEFORE any implementation\n// phase so tests are frozen inputs, not post-hoc rationalizations.\nexport const authorTestsFromSpecTask = defineTask(\n 'author-tests-from-spec',\n (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Author tests from spec (no implementation access)',\n agent: {\n name: 'general-purpose',\n prompt: {\n role: 'Test author',\n task: 'Author tests that exercise every acceptance criterion below.',\n context: {\n specVerbatim: args.specStdout, // from readSpecTask.stdout\n testFilePath: args.testFilePath,\n },\n instructions: [\n 'Treat the SPEC block below as the sole source of truth.',\n 'Do not read files under src/ or implementation directories.',\n 'Cite spec line numbers in each test name.',\n 'If a criterion is impossible to test as written, raise a',\n ' breakpoint -- do not rewrite the criterion.',\n '',\n 'SPEC (verbatim, do not paraphrase):',\n '---',\n args.specStdout,\n '---',\n ],\n },\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`,\n },\n }),\n);\n\n// Phase N: verification agent -- re-read spec AND artifacts fresh via cat/\n// git show, interpolate both verbatim, and end with a direct compare\n// instruction. Recency anchors the verifier's attention on source-of-truth\n// rather than accumulated narrative drift.\nexport const verifyAgainstSpecTask = defineTask(\n 'verify-against-spec',\n (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'agent',\n title: 'Spec-vs-artifact verification (recency-anchored)',\n agent: {\n name: 'general-purpose',\n prompt: {\n role: 'Acceptance reviewer',\n task: 'Compare SPEC to ARTIFACTS directly. Report per-criterion pass/fail.',\n instructions: [\n 'Ignore any narrative in your context about how ARTIFACTS were built.',\n 'Do not summarize either block -- compare line by line.',\n '',\n 'SPEC (verbatim):',\n '---',\n args.specStdout,\n '---',\n '',\n 'ARTIFACTS (verbatim):',\n '---',\n args.artifactsStdout,\n '---',\n ],\n },\n },\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`,\n },\n }),\n);\n```\n\nThe spec source can be any file -- markdown specs under `specs/`, issue body\ndumps written to `/tmp/`, `bd show > /tmp/spec.md`, etc. The pattern is\northogonal to the spec-tracking tool; what matters is that the bytes are read\nat execution time, not authored into the process file as a string literal.\n\n### Skill Task Example\n\nImportant: Check which skills are actually available before assigning the skill\nname. Check the skills in the plugin (in nested folders) and to find relevant\nskills to use as a reference. Skills are preferred over subagents for executing\ntasks.\nWhen delegating the skill execution, use a generous timeout budget and require\nthe skill to execute the work and return the real result.\n\n```javascript\nexport const skillTask = defineTask('analyzer-skill', (args, taskCtx) => ({\n kind: 'skill',\n title: 'Analyze codebase',\n\n skill: {\n name: 'codebase-analyzer',\n context: {\n scope: args.scope,\n depth: args.depth,\n analysisType: args.type,\n criteria: ['Code consistency', 'Naming conventions', 'Error handling'],\n instructions: [\n 'Scan specified paths for code patterns',\n 'Analyze consistency across the codebase',\n 'Check naming conventions',\n 'Review error handling patterns',\n 'Generate structured analysis report'\n ]\n }\n },\n\n io: {\n inputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/inputs.json`,\n outputJsonPath: `tasks/${taskCtx.effectId}/output.json`\n }\n}));\n```\n\n---\n\n## Quick Commands Reference\n\n**Create run (with session binding):**\n```bash\n$CLI run:create --process-id --entry # --inputs \\\n --prompt \"$PROMPT\" --harness pi [--non-interactive] --json\n```\n\n`--harness` binds the run to the current session via the **PID-scoped session\nmarker** (authoritative) written by the session-start hook. The harness env\nfile and `AGENT_SESSION_ID` env var are only consulted as fallbacks, so\nruns stay bound to the correct session even when env vars are stale or\ninherited across shells. Verify with `babysitter session:whoami --json`.\n\n**Check status:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:status --json\n```\n\nWhen the run completes, `run:iterate` and `run:status` emit `completionProof`.\nUse that exact value in a `...` tag to end the loop.\n\n**View events:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:events --limit 20 --reverse\n```\n\n**List tasks:**\n```bash\n$CLI task:list --pending --json\n```\n\n**Post task result:**\n```bash\n$CLI task:post --status --json\n```\n\n**Assign process to bare run:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:assign-process --entry # [--process-id ] [--json]\n```\n\n**Iterate:**\n```bash\n$CLI run:iterate --json --iteration \n```\n\n---\n\n## Recovery from failure\n\nIf at any point the run fails due to SDK issues or corrupted state or journal,\nanalyze the error and the journal events. Recover the state and journal to the\nlast known good state, adapt, and try to continue the run.\n\nIf `run:events` or `run:status --json` shows `PROCESS_RUNTIME_ERROR`, prefer the\ntargeted recovery command before manual journal edits:\n\n```bash\n$CLI run:recover-process-error --dry-run --json\n$CLI run:recover-process-error --patch-effect ':checks=[]' --json\n```\n\nPatch the offending task result only when the fix is clear. Running recovery\nwithout a patch is allowed, but the next `run:iterate` should honestly rethrow if\nthe bad result remains.\n\nWhen recovery requires it, repair the actual process/run artifacts instead of\nonly describing the problem. If the process authored a bad loop, impossible\nshell command, or permanently failing effect pattern, edit the process file\nitself. If the run metadata is what is blocking replay, repair the journal\nentries and/or task files/results so the next `run:iterate` can proceed from a\ncoherent state.\n\n---\n\n## Process Creation Guidelines and methodologies\n\n- When building UX and full stack applications, integrate/link the main pages\n of the frontend with functionality created for every phase of the development\n process (where relevant), so that there is a way to test the functionality as\n you go.\n\n- Unless otherwise specified, prefer quality gated iterative development loops\n in the process.\n\n- You can change the process after the run is created or during the run (and\n adapt the process accordingly and journal accordingly) in case you discover new\n information or requirements.\n\n- The process should be a comprehensive and complete solution to the user\n request.\n\n- The process should usually be a composition (in code) of multiple processes\n from the process library (not just one), for multiple phases and parts of the\n process, each utilizing a different process from the library as a reference.\n\n- Include verification and refinement steps (and loops) for planning phases and\n integration phases, debugging phases, refactoring phases, etc.\n\n- Create the process with (and around) the available skills and subagents.\n (check which are available first and use discover to find them)\n\n- Prefer incremental work that allows testing and experimentation with the new\n functionality as you go.\n\n### Process File Discovery Markers\n\nWhen creating process files, include `@skill` and `@agent` markers in the JSDoc\nheader listing the skills and agents relevant to this process. The SDK reads\nthese markers to provide targeted discovery results instead of scanning all\navailable skills.\n\n**Format** (one per line, path relative to the active process-library root):\n```javascript\n/**\n * @process specializations/web-development/react-app-development\n * @description React app development with TDD\n * @skill frontend-design specializations/web-development/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md\n * @agent frontend-architect specializations/web-development/agents/frontend-architect/AGENT.md\n */\n```\n\n**Steps during process creation:**\n1. Use `babysitter skill:discover --process-path --json` to find\n relevant skills/agents in the specialization directory\n2. Select the ones actually needed by the process tasks\n3. Add them as `@skill`/`@agent` markers in the JSDoc header\n4. Use full relative path from the active process-library root returned in\n `binding.dir` by `babysitter process-library:active --json`\n\n- Unless otherwise specified, prefer processes that close the widest loop in the\n quality gates (for example e2e tests with a full browser or emulator/vm if it\n is a mobile or desktop app) AND gates that make sure the work is accurate\n against the user request (all the specs are covered and no extra stuff was\n added unless permitted by the intent of the user).\n\n- Scan the methodologies and processes in the active process library and the SDK\n package to find relevant processes and methodologies to use as a reference.\n This search is mandatory before writing the process.\n\n- If you encounter a generic reusable part of a process that can be later reused\n and composed, build it in a modular way and organize it in the `.a5c/processes`\n directory.\n\nPrefer processes that have the following characteristics unless otherwise\nspecified:\n - In case of a new project, plan the architecture, stack, parts, milestones\n - In case of an existing project, analyze the architecture, stack, relevant\n parts, milestones, and plan the changes\n - In case of modifying existing code (brownfield), trace the runtime call path\n from user-facing entry points through to final output before planning changes;\n record traced paths as `runtimeCallPaths` in the planning output; only modify\n files that are actually on the live execution path (see ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md\n Pattern 9 for the full pattern)\n - Integrate/link the main pages (or entry points) with functionality created\n for every phase of the development process\n - Quality gated iterative and convergent development/refinement loops\n - Test driven -- where quality gates use `kind: 'shell'` tasks with\n `expectedExitCode` for deterministic verification (compilation, linting,\n test suites, grep checks, dependency availability, runtime smoke tests).\n Reserve `kind: 'agent'` for subjective assessment only (code review,\n architecture evaluation, UX quality)\n - Integration phases for each new functionality in every milestone\n - Where relevant -- beautiful and polished UX with pixel-perfect verification\n - Accurate and complete implementation of the user request\n - For implementation phases that author planned new files under `scripts/`,\n `supabase/migrations/`, `src/server/`, or `src/lib/`, require an exact path\n preflight with `ls` or `rg`/`grep` before writing. If a planned new path\n already exists, read the existing file, report findings to the orchestrator,\n and wait for scope direction such as use-existing, replace, append, or\n renumber. Do not auto-resolve existing-file collisions.\n - Closing quality feedback loops as comprehensively as practical\n - Search for processes, skills, agents, methodologies during the interactive\n process building phase to compose a comprehensive process:\n - `.a5c/processes/` (project level processes)\n - `specializations/` under the active process-library root\n - `methodologies/` under the active process-library root\n - **Drift-resistant prompt composition** (issue #129). In multi-phase\n processes, never paraphrase spec text into agent-task prompt literals.\n Read specs at run time via `kind: 'shell'` `cat` tasks and interpolate\n stdout verbatim into downstream prompts -- this keeps spec bytes out of\n the authoring compose pass where proximity bias rewrites criteria to\n match recently-built implementation. Order test-authoring phases *before*\n implementation phases so the tests become frozen inputs rather than a\n post-hoc rationalization of what got built. See the \"Drift-resistant\n prompt composition\" section of the process creation guidance for the\n full pattern and examples.\n\n---\n\n## Critical Rules\n\nCRITICAL RULE: The completion proof is emitted only when the run is completed.\nYou may ONLY output `SECRET` when the run is completely and\nunequivocally DONE (completed status from the orchestration CLI). Do not output\nfalse promises to escape the run, and do not mention the secret to the user.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: In interactive mode, NEVER auto-approve breakpoints. If the\nresponse is empty, no selection, or is dismissed, treat it as NOT approved and\nre-ask. NEVER fabricate or synthesize approval responses -- only post the user's\nactual explicit selection via task:post. An empty response is NOT approval.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: If a run is broken/failed/at unknown state because of\n`PROCESS_RUNTIME_ERROR`, first use `run:recover-process-error` with `--dry-run`\nand, when appropriate, `--patch-effect`. Manual journal removal is a fallback\nonly for corruption that the targeted recovery command cannot represent.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: If the process reaches a dead-end, loops uselessly, or keeps\nemitting shell/tasks that always fail, do not keep replaying the same broken\niteration forever. Inspect the process file, journal, and task artifacts, then\nrepair the run so it can continue. This may require editing the process file\nitself and/or correcting run artifacts such as journal entries, task\ndefinitions, or task result files so the next `run:iterate` can make forward\nprogress.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: When creating processes, search for available skills and subagents\nbefore thinking about the exact orchestration. Prefer processes that close the\nwidest loop in the quality gates.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Do not use the babysit skill inside delegated tasks. If you are\nperforming a delegated task as a subagent, you must actually perform the task\nyourself and not orchestrate or babysit.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Never build a wrapper, python, or helper scripts to orchestrate\nthe runs. Use the CLI to drive the orchestration loop directly.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Never fallback to simpler execution if the user activated this\nskill. Persist in executing the orchestration itself -- you must create a valid\nprocess js file, create a run (with `--harness pi` to bind the session\nauthoritatively via the PID-scoped session marker -- the run stays bound to the\ncorrect session even when shells inherit stale `AGENT_SESSION_ID` env vars\nfrom ancestor processes), then iterate the run until it is completed.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: Hooks are NOT available in this environment. You MUST drive the\norchestration loop yourself in-turn: after run:create, keep calling run:iterate,\nperforming effects, and posting results in the same session until the run reaches\na terminal state or you need explicit user input for a breakpoint. Do NOT stop\nand wait for a hook callback -- it will never arrive.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: NEVER use `kind: 'node'` in generated process files. All tasks\nMUST use `kind: 'agent'` or `kind: 'skill'`. The only non-agent kinds allowed\nare `shell` (for existing CLI tools/tests/git), `breakpoint`, and `sleep`.\n\nCRITICAL RULE: NEVER bypass, avoid, or skip the babysitter orchestration model\nwhen the user explicitly requested this skill. Do not execute the tasks yourself,\ndo not create helper scripts. Use the CLI to drive the orchestration loop.\nNot for simple tasks, and even if things get complicated.\nPersist in executing the orchestration itself.\n\nNOTE: CI pipelines and legacy workflows that deliberately export\n`AGENT_SESSION_ID` to bind a run across a pre-launched shell can opt into\nthe old env-var-first behavior by setting `AGENT_TRUST_ENV_SESSION=1`. This\nis an escape hatch only -- interactive sessions should rely on the PID-scoped\nsession marker written by the session-start hook.\n\n---\n\n# Priority Ladder\n\nWhen rules conflict, apply them in this order — higher beats lower:\n\n1. **User's explicit instructions** in the current conversation.\n2. **Project instructions** (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and other\n checked-in guidance files).\n3. **Skill and process definitions** that the current run is executing.\n4. **Default system guidance** (these prompt parts).\n\nIf a lower-priority rule would override a higher-priority one, follow\nthe higher-priority one. Do not silently drop the lower rule — note\nthe override briefly if it would surprise a reader.\n\n---\n\n# Coding Philosophy\n\n- Do not add features, refactor code, or make \"improvements\" beyond what was asked. A bug fix does not need surrounding code cleaned up. A simple feature does not need extra configurability.\n- Do not add docstrings, comments, or type annotations to code you did not change. Only add comments where the logic is not self-evident.\n- Do not add error handling, fallbacks, or validation for scenarios that cannot happen. Trust internal code and framework guarantees. Only validate at system boundaries (user input, external APIs).\n- Do not create helpers, utilities, or abstractions for one-time operations. Do not design for hypothetical future requirements. Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction.\n- Avoid backwards-compatibility hacks like renaming unused _vars, re-exporting types, adding removed comments for removed code. If something is unused, delete it completely.\n- Prefer editing existing files over creating new ones. This prevents file bloat and builds on existing work.\n- Before authoring planned new files under `scripts/`, `supabase/migrations/`, `src/server/`, or `src/lib/`, check each exact path with `ls` or `rg`/`grep`. If a planned new path already exists, read the existing file, report findings to the orchestrator, and wait for scope direction such as use-existing, replace, append, or renumber. Do not auto-resolve existing-file collisions.\n- Do not add feature flags or backwards-compatibility shims when you can just change the code.\n- Address root causes, not symptoms. If a fix only patches a surface effect, trace the underlying cause and fix there instead. A bug that resurfaces elsewhere was not fixed.\n- When a bug pattern is likely to recur, add a preventative guardrail: a test that would have caught it, a lint rule, or a hook. Do not add guardrails for scenarios that cannot recur.\n- When code changes deviate from existing documentation, update the docs in the same change. Do not leave docs referring to the old behavior.\n\n---\n\n# Root Cause & Guardrail\n\n- When diagnosing a failure, keep asking *why* until you reach a cause\n a change can actually fix. A fix that only makes the symptom go away\n leaves the cause live elsewhere.\n- Prefer a small change at the root over a large change at the surface.\n If the surface-level fix is faster, note what the real cause is so it\n can be revisited.\n- When the same bug category has already appeared more than once, add a\n guardrail: a test that reproduces it, a lint/type rule that blocks\n it, or a pre-commit/CI check. A guardrail that would not catch the\n next occurrence is not worth adding.\n- Do not disable tests, checks, or safety rails to make a run pass.\n Either fix the underlying issue, or stop and surface it.\n\n---\n\n# Tool Preferences\n\n- Use dedicated tools instead of shell commands when available: Read (not cat/head/tail), Edit (not sed/awk), Write (not echo/heredoc), Glob (not find/ls), Grep (not grep/rg).\n- You MUST read a file before editing it. Never edit a file you have not read in this session.\n- Reserve shell/Bash for system commands and terminal operations that require actual shell execution.\n- For file search, use Glob with patterns like \"**/*.ts\". For content search, use Grep with regex patterns.\n- Before creating a new file, helper, or task, search first. Reuse or extend an existing one if it covers the same concern — duplicate definitions rot faster than a single source of truth.\n- Reference code by file path and line number (e.g. `src/foo.ts:42`) rather than pasting large snippets. Quoted snippets drift out of sync; paths do not.\n\n---\n\n# Output Efficiency\n\nLead with the answer or action, not the reasoning. Skip filler words, preamble, and unnecessary transitions. Do not restate instructions — just execute them.\n\nFocus output on:\n- Decisions that need input\n- High-level status updates at natural milestones\n- Errors or blockers that change the plan\n\nIf you can say it in one sentence, do not use three. Prefer short, direct sentences over long explanations.\n\n- When delegating to subagents, brief them like a smart colleague who just walked into the room — they have no context from this conversation. Explain what, why, and what you have already learned or ruled out.\n\n---\n\n# Git Operations Protocol\n\n- NEVER update the git config.\n- NEVER run destructive git commands (push --force, reset --hard, checkout ., restore ., clean -f, branch -D) unless explicitly instructed.\n- NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify, --no-gpg-sign) unless explicitly instructed.\n- NEVER force push to main/master.\n- Always create NEW commits rather than amending, unless explicitly asked. When a pre-commit hook fails the commit did NOT happen — so --amend would modify the PREVIOUS commit.\n- When staging files, prefer adding specific files by name rather than using \"git add -A\" or \"git add .\" which can accidentally include secrets (.env, credentials) or large binaries.\n- Do NOT commit files that likely contain secrets (.env, credentials.json, etc.).\n\n---\n\n## See Also\n- `library/tdd-quality-convergence.js` - TDD quality convergence example\n- `library/reference/ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md` - Agent/skill patterns, iterative convergence\n- `library/reference/sdk.md` - SDK API reference","truncated":true,"truncatedBy":"bytes","totalLines":1518,"totalBytes":64404,"outputLines":1232,"outputBytes":51147,"lastLinePartial":false,"firstLineExceedsLimit":false,"maxLines":2000,"maxBytes":51200},"fullOutputPath":"/tmp/pi-bash-31be48c7f9542c25.log"},"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883536783}}
{"type":"message","id":"c5d9642e","parentId":"b5c14063","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:03.103Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The output was truncated - it showed lines 287-1518. I need to get the beginning of the instructions, especially the part about process creation. But this is a lot. The instructions are for how to babysit a run. The plan skill says to create the process but not run it.\n\nWait - the plan skill says: \"Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\" So I should create a process.js file, but not create a run or execute it.\n\nLet me first understand the process library structure. The instructions mention scanning the process library for reusable processes. I should look at what's available.\n\nLet me also read the first part of the instructions that was truncated.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:7","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"npm exec --yes --package @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@6.0.2 -- babysitter instructions:babysit-skill --harness pi --no-interactive | head -300","timeout":120}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":32753,"output":209,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":32962,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883536786,"responseId":"chatcmpl-641","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"98041cc2","parentId":"c5d9642e","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:04.763Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:7","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"npm notice run npx\nnpm notice run 'babysitter' instructions:babysit-skill --harness pi --no-interactive\n## Execution Context\n\n- CI: `local`\n- Trigger: `manual`\n- Repo: `null/null`\n- Actor: `null`\n\nActive context capabilities: `hasLocalDevRelax`\n\nWhen selecting library processes to dispatch, prefer those whose triggers match the active capabilities above.\n\n---\n## Library Processes for Active Capabilities\n\n- `hasLocalDevRelax` → `processes/shared/local-dev-workflow.js`\n\nWhen dispatching work for this context, prefer these processes over ad-hoc instructions.\n# babysit\n\nOrchestrate the resolved run directory (`~/.a5c/runs//` by default, with repo-local fallback compatibility) through iterative execution.\nUse the SDK CLI to drive the orchestration loop.\nNon-hook-driven continuation: when the orchestration environment does not support hooks,\ndo not yield the turn and wait for the Stop hook.\nKeep driving the Babysitter loop in the current turn until the run completes or\nyou hit a real user breakpoint that requires chat input.\n\n---\n\n## Dependencies\n\n### Babysitter SDK and CLI\n\nRead the SDK version from `versions.json` when available, otherwise use the latest SDK:\n\n```bash\nSDK_VERSION=$(node -e \"try{console.log(JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('versions.json','utf8')).sdkVersion||'latest')}catch{console.log('latest')}\")\n```\n\nUse an installed `babysitter` command only after proving it can execute:\n\n```bash\nif command -v babysitter >/dev/null 2>&1 && babysitter --version >/dev/null 2>&1; then\n CLI=\"babysitter\"\nelse\n CLI=\"npm exec --yes --package @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@$SDK_VERSION -- babysitter\"\nfi\n```\n\nIf a stale or broken global shim fails with `MODULE_NOT_FOUND`, repair it with `npm rm -g @a5c-ai/babysitter @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk && npm i -g @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@$SDK_VERSION`, then re-run `babysitter --version`.\n\n### jq\n\nMake sure `jq` is available in the path. Install it if missing.\n\n---\n\n## Core Iteration Workflow\n\nThe Babysitter workflow has 8 steps:\n\n1. **Create or find the process** - interview the user or parse the prompt,\n research the repo and process library, and build a process definition\n2. **Create run and bind session** - create the run via the Babysitter CLI and\n bind it to the current Pi Coding Agent session\n3. **Run iteration** - execute one orchestration step\n4. **Get effects** - inspect pending effects\n5. **Perform effects** - execute the requested tasks through skills, agents, or\n shell work\n6. **Post results** - commit results back through `task:post`\n7. **Stop and yield** - the Pi Coding Agent stop-hook decides whether to continue (when hooks are unavailable,\n stay in-turn and continue the loop yourself instead)\n8. **Completion proof** - finish only when the emitted proof is returned\n\n### 1. Create or find the process for the run\n\n---\n\n#### Interview phase\n\n##### Interactive mode (default)\n\nInterview the user for the intent, requirements, goal, scope, etc.\n\nA multi-step phase to understand the intent and perspective to approach the\nprocess building after researching the repo, short research online if needed,\nshort research in the target repo, additional instructions, intent and library\n(processes, specializations, skills, subagents, methodologies, references, etc.)\n/ guide for methodology building.\n\nThe active process-library root is: `/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library`\n\nThe reference root is: `/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/plugins/babysitter/reference`\n\nSearch this directory for relevant specializations, methodologies, and references.\nTreat `specializations/**/**/**`, `methodologies/`, `contrib/`, and `reference/`\nas paths relative to the active process-library root. You MUST conduct an actual\nsearch against that active process library instead of skipping directly to writing\na process.\n\nThe first step should be to look at the state of the repo, then find the most\nrelevant processes, specializations, skills, subagents, methodologies,\nreferences, etc. to use as a reference. Use the babysitter CLI discover command\nto find the relevant processes, skills, subagents, etc. at various stages.\n\nFor `babysitter:plan` or plan-only requests, run **Phase 0 -- REUSE-AUDIT**\nbefore drafting any process or infrastructure plan. Extract keyword nouns and\nverbs from the user's prompt, then scan the project for matching existing\nmigrations, API routes, environment variables, SDK dependencies, and imports.\nIf `.a5c/reuse-audit.json` exists, use its scan globs and keyword extraction\nrules to shape the audit. Surface the findings before Phase 1 so the plan can\nextend or reuse existing infrastructure instead of recreating it.\n\nThen this phase can have: research online, research the repo, user questions, and\nother steps one after the other until the intent, requirements, goal, scope, etc.\nare clear and the user is satisfied with the understanding. After each step,\ndecide the type of next step to take. Do not plan more than 1 step ahead in this\nphase. The same step type can be used more than once in this phase.\n\n##### Non-interactive mode (running with -p flag or no AskUserQuestion)\n\nWhen running non-interactively, skip the interview phase entirely. Instead:\n\n1. Parse the initial prompt to extract intent, scope, and requirements.\n2. Research the repo structure to understand the codebase.\n\n3. The active process-library root is already resolved: `/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library`.\n Search that active library for the most relevant specialization/methodology.\n Do not skip this search step.\n\n4. For `babysitter:plan` or plan-only requests, run **Phase 0 -- REUSE-AUDIT**\n before drafting any process or infrastructure plan. Extract keyword nouns and\n verbs from the user's prompt, scan for matching existing migrations, API\n routes, environment variables, SDK dependencies, and imports, and honor\n `.a5c/reuse-audit.json` scan globs and keyword extraction rules when present.\n5. Proceed directly to the process creation phase using the extracted\n requirements.\n\n---\n\n#### User Profile Integration\n\nBefore building the process, check for an existing user profile to personalize\nthe orchestration:\n\n1. **Read user profile**: Run `babysitter profile:read --user --json` to load\n the user profile. **Always use the CLI for profile operations -- never import\n or call SDK profile functions directly.**\n\n2. **Pre-fill context**: Use the profile to understand the user's specialties,\n expertise levels, preferences, and communication style. This informs how you\n conduct the interview (skip questions the profile already answers) and how you\n build the process.\n\n3. **Breakpoint density**: Use the `breakpointTolerance` field to calibrate\n breakpoint placement in the generated process:\n - `minimal`/`low` (expert users): Fewer breakpoints -- only at critical\n decision points (architecture choices, deployment, destructive operations)\n - `moderate` (intermediate users): Standard breakpoints at phase boundaries\n - `high`/`maximum` (novice users): More breakpoints -- add review gates after\n each implementation step, before each integration, and at every quality gate\n - Always respect `alwaysBreakOn` for operations that must always pause (e.g.,\n destructive-git, deploy)\n - If `skipBreakpointsForKnownPatterns` is true, reduce breakpoints for\n operations the user has previously approved\n\n4. **Tool preferences**: Use `toolPreferences` and `installedSkills`/\n `installedAgents` to prioritize which agents and skills to use in the process.\n Prefer tools the user is familiar with.\n\n5. **Communication style**: Adapt process descriptions and breakpoint questions\n to match the user's `communicationStyle` preferences (tone, explanationDepth,\n preferredResponseFormat).\n\n6. **If no profile exists**: Proceed normally with the interview phase.\n\n7. **CLI profile commands (mandatory)**: **All profile operations MUST use the\n babysitter CLI -- never import SDK profile functions directly.**\n - `babysitter profile:read --user --json`\n - `babysitter profile:read --project --json`\n - `babysitter profile:write --user --input --json`\n - `babysitter profile:write --project --input --json`\n - `babysitter profile:merge --user --input --json`\n - `babysitter profile:merge --project --input --json`\n - `babysitter profile:render --user`\n - `babysitter profile:render --project`\n\n Use `--dir ` to override the default profile directory when needed.\n\n---\n\n#### Process creation phase\n\nAfter the interview phase, create the complete custom process files (js and\njsons) for the run according to the Process Creation Guidelines and\nmethodologies section. Place process files in `.a5c/processes/`.\n\n**Note:** The `run:create` command automatically ensures `.a5c/package.json`\nexists with `\"type\": \"module\"` for ESM support. You do **not** need to install\nthe babysitter-sdk inside `.a5c/` or create a package.json manually.\n\nYou must abide the syntax and structure of the process files from the process\nlibrary.\n\n**Process library root**: `/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library`\n\n**Reference root**: `/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/plugins/babysitter/reference`\n\nUse these paths to find relevant process patterns, specializations, and\nmethodologies when authoring the process.\n\n**IMPORTANT -- Path resolution**: Always use **absolute paths** for `--entry`\nwhen calling `run:create`, and always run the CLI from the **project root**\ndirectory (not from `.a5c/`).\n\n**User profile awareness**: If a user profile was loaded in the User Profile\nIntegration step, use it to inform process design -- adjust breakpoint density\nper the user's tolerance level, select agents/skills the user prefers, and match\nthe process complexity to the user's expertise.\n\n**IMPORTANT -- Profile I/O in processes**: When generating process files, all\nprofile read/write/merge operations MUST use the babysitter CLI commands\n(`babysitter profile:read`, `profile:write`, `profile:merge`,\n`profile:render`). Never instruct agents to import or call SDK profile functions\ndirectly.\n\n**Phase 0 -- REUSE-AUDIT for `babysitter:plan`**: Before drafting a plan that\nintroduces new infrastructure such as tables, migrations, API routes,\nenvironment variables, or SDK installs, run a targeted reuse audit:\n\n1. Extract keyword nouns and verbs from the user prompt.\n2. Scan existing migrations such as `supabase/migrations/*.sql` or the\n framework-equivalent migration path for those keywords.\n3. Scan API route files such as `src/app/api/**/route.{ts,js}` and equivalent\n framework route locations by filename and handler content.\n4. Scan environment-variable usage such as `process.env.**` in source\n files.\n5. Check package dependencies and source imports for SDKs matching the\n keywords.\n6. If `.a5c/reuse-audit.json` exists, use its scan globs and keyword extraction\n rules instead of hard-coding project assumptions.\n\nWhen producing a plan, render this block before Phase 1:\n\n```markdown\n## Reuse-audit findings (REVIEW BEFORE PROCEEDING)\n\nThe following pre-existing infrastructure matches keywords from your prompt:\n\n- **Migration**: `` -- ``. Consider extending this instead of adding a duplicate.\n- **Route**: `` -- ``. Consider reusing or extending this route.\n- **Env var**: `` -- already used by ``. Consider reusing it.\n- **SDK**: `` -- already declared or imported. Consider whether it can serve this feature.\n\nIf any of the above changes your plan, revise BEFORE Phase 1.\n```\n\nIf the audit finds no matches, still include the heading with a brief \"No\nmatching existing infrastructure found\" note so reviewers know the pre-flight\nran. Draft the plan with the reuse-audit findings in context.\n\n**Implementation-time orphan-file preflight**: In implementation tasks, before\nan agent authors planned new files under `scripts/`, `supabase/migrations/`,\n`src/server/`, or `src/lib/`, instruct it to check each exact path with `ls`\nor `rg`/`grep`. If an exact planned new path already exists, the agent must\nread the existing file, report findings to the orchestrator, and wait for\nscope direction such as use-existing, replace, append, or renumber. Do not auto-resolve\nexisting-file collisions.\n\nAfter the process is created and before creating the run:\n\n- **Interactive mode**: describe the process at high level (not the code or\n implementation details) to the user and ask for confirmation to use it, also\n generate it as a [process-name].mermaid.md and [process-name].process.md file.\n If the user is not satisfied with the process, go back to the process creation\n phase and modify the process according to the feedback.\n- **Non-interactive mode**: proceed directly to creating the run without user\n confirmation.\n\n**Common mistakes to avoid:**\n- wrong: skipping repo/process-library research before writing the process\n- wrong: bypassing the orchestration model with helper scripts or inline logic\n- wrong: using `kind: 'node'` in generated tasks\n- wrong: using `kind: 'agent'` for deterministic verification (compilation,\n linting, test execution, grep checks, dependency validation) -- these MUST\n use `kind: 'shell'` with `expectedExitCode` for binary pass/fail enforcement\n- correct: use `agent` or `skill` tasks for reasoning work (planning, code\n review, architecture assessment, subjective evaluation)\n- correct: use `shell` tasks for all objectively verifiable checks (tsc, eslint,\n vitest, grep, dependency imports, runtime smoke tests)\n- correct: include verification loops, refinement loops, quality gates, and\n breakpoints where appropriate\n- correct: pair shell verification gates with agent analysis tasks (shell runs\n the check, agent interprets failures and suggests fixes)\n- correct: for brownfield changes, trace the runtime call path from entry points\n to final output first, record as `runtimeCallPaths`, and scope modifications\n only to files on the live execution path (see ADVANCED_PATTERNS.md Pattern 9)\n\n### Drift-resistant prompt composition (issue #129)\n\nIn multi-phase processes, your own attention is biased toward recently-built\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883544763}}
{"type":"message","id":"3fb7dca1","parentId":"98041cc2","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:17.808Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Now I have the full picture. The instructions tell me to:\n\n1. For `babysitter:plan` or plan-only requests, run Phase 0 -- REUSE-AUDIT\n2. Create the process files in `.a5c/processes/`\n3. In non-interactive mode, proceed directly to creating the run\n\nBut the user's actual skill directive says \"Focus on creating the best process possible, but without creating and running the actual run.\"\n\nSo I should:\n1. Do the reuse audit\n2. Research the process library\n3. Create the process file(s)\n4. Generate process-name.mermaid.md and process-name.process.md files\n5. NOT create a run or execute it\n\nSince we're in interactive mode (I used ask_user_question), I should also describe the process at a high level and ask for confirmation. But the plan skill says \"without creating and running the actual run\" - so maybe I should describe it and ask for confirmation, but not create the run.\n\nActually, the instructions say:\n- After the process is created and before creating the run:\n - Interactive mode: describe the process at high level and ask for confirmation to use it, also generate .mermaid.md and .process.md files. If user not satisfied, modify.\n - Non-interactive mode: proceed directly to creating the run.\n\nSo in interactive mode I should ask for confirmation before creating the run. But the plan skill says not to create and run the actual run. So I should create the process, generate docs, ask for confirmation, and stop there (not create the run).\n\nWait, actually the plan skill might be a special mode where I don't execute. But the babysit instructions say interactive mode asks for confirmation to use it (presumably to create the run). The plan skill says \"without creating and running the actual run\" - so I should create the process and docs, and then stop. Maybe I don't need to ask for confirmation? Or maybe I describe the process and ask if they want me to proceed to create the run? But the skill says don't create and run.\n\nHmm, this is ambiguous. Let me interpret the plan skill as: create a plan/process but don't execute it. In interactive mode, I can still present the plan and ask if they want to proceed (which would be a separate \"babysit\" invocation). But for now, just produce the plan artifacts.\n\nOK, let me proceed with:\n1. Phase 0 reuse audit (the workspace is empty, but I should still do a minimal check)\n2. Research the process library for relevant processes\n3. Create the process file in `.a5c/processes/`\n4. Generate .mermaid.md and .process.md\n5. Present summary to user\n\nLet me start by doing the reuse audit and checking the process library.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:8","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"# Phase 0 REUSE-AUDIT: workspace is empty, but check for .a5c/reuse-audit.json and any hidden scaffolding\nls -la .a5c 2>/dev/null || echo \"No .a5c directory\"\necho \"---\"\nfind . -maxdepth 3 -type f \\( -name \"*.json\" -o -name \"*.md\" -o -name \"*.ts\" -o -name \"*.js\" -o -name \"*.tsx\" -o -name \"*.jsx\" \\) 2>/dev/null | head -50","timeout":30}},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:9","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"# Discover available process-library specializations and skills\nnpm exec --yes --package @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@6.0.2 -- babysitter process-library:active --json 2>/dev/null || echo \"process-library:active failed\"\necho \"---\"\nnpm exec --yes --package @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk@6.0.2 -- babysitter skill:discover --process-path webstore --json 2>/dev/null | head -100 || echo \"skill:discover failed\"","timeout":120}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":36185,"output":861,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":37046,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883544765,"responseId":"chatcmpl-988","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"49c98aa3","parentId":"3fb7dca1","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:20.233Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:8","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"No .a5c directory\n---\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883560233}}
{"type":"message","id":"9a711cc4","parentId":"49c98aa3","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:20.234Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:9","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"{\n \"stateFile\": \"/home/liph/.a5c/active/process-library.json\",\n \"bindingScope\": \"default\",\n \"binding\": {\n \"dir\": \"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library\",\n \"repoUrl\": \"https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter.git\",\n \"revision\": \"44a5d58b47b93962f143914e0652d9e3ae5dcf2c\",\n \"boundAt\": \"2026-07-24T07:50:57.614Z\"\n },\n \"bootstrapped\": false,\n \"defaultSpec\": {\n \"stateDir\": \"/home/liph/.a5c\",\n \"repo\": \"https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter.git\",\n \"cloneDir\": \"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo\",\n \"processRoot\": \"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library\",\n \"referenceRoot\": \"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/plugins/babysitter/reference\"\n }\n}\n---\n{\n \"skills\": [\n {\n \"name\": \"assimilate\",\n \"description\": \"Assimilate an external methodology, harness, or specification into babysitter pr\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/assimilate/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"babysit\",\n \"description\": \"Execute via @babysitter. Use this skill when asked to babysit a task, do anythin\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/babysit/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"blueprints\",\n \"description\": \"manage Babysitter blueprints. Use this command to list installed blueprints, bro\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/blueprints/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"call\",\n \"description\": \"Orchestrate a babysitter run. use this command to start babysitting a complex wo\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/call/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"check-forbidden-markers\",\n \"description\": \"Pre-deploy gate that scans built JS chunks for forbidden substring markers (saga\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/check-forbidden-markers/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"cleanup\",\n \"description\": \"Clean up .a5c/runs and .a5c/processes directories. Aggregates insights from comp\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/cleanup/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"contrib\",\n \"description\": \"Submit feedback or contribute to babysitter project\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/contrib/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"doctor\",\n \"description\": \"Diagnose babysitter run health - journal integrity, state cache, effects, locks,\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/doctor/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"forever\",\n \"description\": \"Use this command to start babysitting a never-ending babysitter run.\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/forever/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"help\",\n \"description\": \"help and documentation for babysitter command usage, processes, skills, agents, \",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/help/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"observe\",\n \"description\": \"Launch the babysitter observer dashboard. Installs and runs the real-time observ\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/observe/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"plan\",\n \"description\": \"Plan a babysitter run. use this command to plan a complex workflow, without actu\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/plan/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"plugins\",\n \"description\": \"deprecated alias for the Babysitter blueprints command. Use /babysitter:blueprin\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/plugins/SKILL.md\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"project-install\",\n \"description\": \"Set up a project for babysitting. Guides you through onboarding a new or existin\",\n \"category\": \"\",\n \"source\": \"local-plugin\",\n \"file\": \"/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/@a5c-ai/babysitter-pi/skills/project-install/SKILL.md\"\n },\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883560234}}
{"type":"message","id":"347e2b91","parentId":"9a711cc4","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:29.358Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Good. Now I need to look at the process library to find relevant reference processes. The active library is at `/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library`. Let me explore specializations and shared processes.\n\nI should look for:\n- web development / nextjs processes\n- database integration\n- auth processes\n- ecommerce/store processes\n\nLet me search the library.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:10","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"ls /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/","timeout":30}},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.ffffind:11","name":"ffffind","arguments":{"path":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library","pattern":"ecommerce shop store nextjs react auth","limit":30}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":38470,"output":166,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":38636,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883560235,"responseId":"chatcmpl-63","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"ef5ea849","parentId":"347e2b91","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:29.365Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:10","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"assets\ncontrib\ncradle\nexamples\nmethodologies\nprocesses\nREADME.md\nreference\nspecializations\nSPEC-KIT.md\ntdd-quality-convergence.js\ntdd-quality-convergence.md\n__tests__\nvitest.config.mjs\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883569365}}
{"type":"message","id":"5d6463ec","parentId":"ef5ea849","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:29.365Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.ffffind:11","toolName":"ffffind","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Tool ffffind not found"}],"details":{},"isError":true,"timestamp":1784883569365}}
{"type":"message","id":"a09dda98","parentId":"5d6463ec","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:31.461Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"ffffind is not available in the functions namespace? Wait, it is. But maybe the path was wrong. Let me use bash to search instead.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:12","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"find /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library -type f -iname \"*.js\" -o -iname \"*.md\" | sed 's|/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/||' | sort | head -200","timeout":30}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":38719,"output":114,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":38833,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883569367,"responseId":"chatcmpl-665","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"f257ae19","parentId":"a09dda98","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:31.563Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:12","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"assets/code-quality/eslint.config.js\nassets/README.md\ncontrib/joe-habu/superbabysitter/quality-gated-development.js\ncontrib/joe-habu/superbabysitter/README.md\ncontrib/rogelsm/generic-bugfix.js\ncontrib/rogelsm/generic-feature.js\ncontrib/rogelsm/infra-diagnostic.js\ncontrib/rogelsm/serverReachableGate.js\ncontrib/rogelsm/shared-common.js\ncontrib/rogelsm/triage.js\ncradle/bugfix.js\ncradle/bug-report.js\ncradle/cleanup-runs.js\ncradle/contribute.js\ncradle/documentation-contribute-answer.js\ncradle/documentation-question.js\ncradle/feature-harness-integration-contribute.js\ncradle/feature-implementation-contribute.js\ncradle/feature-request.js\ncradle/library-contribution.js\ncradle/project-install.js\ncradle/user-install.js\nmethodologies/adversarial-spec-debates.js\nmethodologies/agile.js\nmethodologies/ai-workflows-backlog.md\nmethodologies/atdd-tdd/atdd-tdd.js\nmethodologies/atdd-tdd/examples/README.md\nmethodologies/atdd-tdd/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/code-generator/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/code-generator/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/code-reviewer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/code-reviewer/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/deployment-engineer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/deployment-engineer/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/feature-planner/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/feature-planner/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/progress-streamer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/progress-streamer/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/test-runner/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/test-runner/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/worktree-manager/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/automaker/agents/worktree-manager/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/automaker-agent-execution.js\nmethodologies/automaker/automaker-feature-pipeline.js\nmethodologies/automaker/automaker-orchestrator.js\nmethodologies/automaker/automaker-review-ship.js\nmethodologies/automaker/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/references.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/agent-dispatch/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/agent-dispatch/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/code-review-gate/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/code-review-gate/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/feature-intake/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/feature-intake/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/kanban-management/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/kanban-management/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/streaming-progress/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/streaming-progress/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/test-automation/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/test-automation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/worktree-isolation/README.md\nmethodologies/automaker/skills/worktree-isolation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/backlog.md\nmethodologies/base44.js\nmethodologies/bdd-specification-by-example/bdd-process.js\nmethodologies/bdd-specification-by-example/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/analyst/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/analyst/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/architect/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/architect/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/bmad-master/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/bmad-master/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/developer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/developer/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/product-manager/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/product-manager/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/qa-engineer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/qa-engineer/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/scrum-master/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/scrum-master/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/solo-dev/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/solo-dev/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/tech-writer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/tech-writer/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/ux-designer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/agents/ux-designer/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/bmad-analysis.js\nmethodologies/bmad-method/bmad-document-project.js\nmethodologies/bmad-method/bmad-implementation.js\nmethodologies/bmad-method/bmad-orchestrator.js\nmethodologies/bmad-method/bmad-party-mode.js\nmethodologies/bmad-method/bmad-quick-flow.js\nmethodologies/bmad-method/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/references.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/architecture-design/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/architecture-design/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/code-review/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/code-review/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/prd-creation/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/prd-creation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/product-brief-creation/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/product-brief-creation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/project-documentation/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/project-documentation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/qa-testing/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/qa-testing/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/quick-flow/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/quick-flow/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/sprint-planning/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/sprint-planning/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/story-development/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/story-development/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/ux-design/README.md\nmethodologies/bmad-method/skills/ux-design/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/bottom-up.js\nmethodologies/build-realtime-remediation.js\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/bug-investigator/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/bug-investigator/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/cc10x-router/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/cc10x-router/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/code-reviewer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/code-reviewer/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/component-builder/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/component-builder/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/github-researcher/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/github-researcher/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/integration-verifier/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/integration-verifier/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/planner/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/planner/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/silent-failure-hunter/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/agents/silent-failure-hunter/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/cc10x-build.js\nmethodologies/cc10x/cc10x-debug.js\nmethodologies/cc10x/cc10x-plan.js\nmethodologies/cc10x/cc10x-review.js\nmethodologies/cc10x/cc10x-router.js\nmethodologies/cc10x/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/references.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/architecture-patterns/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/architecture-patterns/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/code-generation/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/code-generation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/code-review-patterns/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/code-review-patterns/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/debugging-patterns/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/debugging-patterns/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/planning-patterns/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/planning-patterns/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/session-memory/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/session-memory/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/test-driven-development/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/verification-before-completion/README.md\nmethodologies/cc10x/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/api-developer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/api-developer/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/architect/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/architect/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/database-engineer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/database-engineer/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/documentation-writer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/documentation-writer/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/product-planner/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/product-planner/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/project-tracker/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/project-tracker/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/task-analyst/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/task-analyst/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/test-engineer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/test-engineer/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/ui-developer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/agents/ui-developer/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/ccpm-epic-planning.js\nmethodologies/ccpm/ccpm-orchestrator.js\nmethodologies/ccpm/ccpm-parallel-execution.js\nmethodologies/ccpm/ccpm-prd-workflow.js\nmethodologies/ccpm/ccpm-task-decomposition.js\nmethodologies/ccpm/ccpm-tracking.js\nmethodologies/ccpm/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/references.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/audit-trail/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/audit-trail/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/context-management/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/context-management/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/epic-generation/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/epic-generation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/github-sync/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/github-sync/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/parallel-orchestration/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/parallel-orchestration/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/prd-creation/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/prd-creation/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/progress-tracking/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/progress-tracking/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/task-decomposition/README.md\nmethodologies/ccpm/skills/task-decomposition/SKILL.md\nmethodologies/claudekit/agents/architecture-reviewer/AGENT.md\nmethodologies/claudekit/agents/architecture-reviewer/README.md\nmethodologies/claudekit/agents/code-review-coordinator/AGENT.md\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883571563}}
{"type":"message","id":"2bd5230c","parentId":"f257ae19","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:34.011Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The list is very long. Let me look specifically at specializations/web-development and processes/shared.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:13","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"find /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations -type f | sort | head -100\necho \"---\"\nfind /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes -type f | sort | head -100\necho \"---\"\nfind /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared -type f | sort 2>/dev/null | head -50","timeout":30}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":41335,"output":146,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":41481,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883571565,"responseId":"chatcmpl-603","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"0e37f876","parentId":"2bd5230c","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:34.145Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:13","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/ab-testing-conversational.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/add-app-to-mcp-server.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/advanced-rag-patterns.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agent-deployment-pipeline.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agent-evaluation-framework.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agent-performance-optimization.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/agent-deployment-engineer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/agent-deployment-engineer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/agent-evaluator/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/agent-evaluator/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/bias-fairness-analyst/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/bias-fairness-analyst/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/chunking-strategy-expert/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/chunking-strategy-expert/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/conversation-repair-expert/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/conversation-repair-expert/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/cost-optimizer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/cost-optimizer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/cot-reasoning-expert/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/cot-reasoning-expert/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/csp-security-auditor/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/csp-security-auditor/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/dialogue-designer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/dialogue-designer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/entity-extraction-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/entity-extraction-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/few-shot-curator/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/few-shot-curator/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/fine-tuning-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/fine-tuning-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/intent-taxonomy-expert/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/intent-taxonomy-expert/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/knowledge-base-curator/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/knowledge-base-curator/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/langgraph-workflow-designer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/langgraph-workflow-designer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/latency-optimizer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/latency-optimizer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/llm-judge/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/llm-judge/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/mcp-app-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/mcp-app-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/mcp-migration-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/mcp-migration-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/mcp-ui-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/mcp-ui-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/memory-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/memory-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/multi-agent-coordinator/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/multi-agent-coordinator/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/multimodal-agent-expert/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/multimodal-agent-expert/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/observability-engineer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/observability-engineer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/persona-designer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/persona-designer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/plan-execute-planner/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/plan-execute-planner/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/prompt-injection-defender/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/prompt-injection-defender/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/prompt-optimizer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/prompt-optimizer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/rag-pipeline-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/rag-pipeline-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/react-agent-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/react-agent-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/retrieval-optimizer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/retrieval-optimizer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/safety-auditor/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/safety-auditor/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/semantic-memory-curator/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/semantic-memory-curator/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/state-machine-designer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/state-machine-designer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/synthetic-data-generator/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/synthetic-data-generator/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/system-prompt-engineer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/system-prompt-engineer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/tool-use-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/tool-use-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/user-profile-builder/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/user-profile-builder/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/vector-db-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/vector-db-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/voice-ai-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/agents/voice-ai-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/autonomous-task-planning.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/bias-detection-fairness.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/chatbot-design-implementation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/chunking-strategy-design.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/content-moderation-safety.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/conversational-memory-system.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/conversational-persona-design.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/conversation-quality-testing.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/convert-web-app-to-mcp.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/cost-optimization-llm.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/create-mcp-app.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/custom-tool-development.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/dialogue-flow-design.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/ai-agents-conversational/empathetic-response-generation.js\n---\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/analysis/process-mining.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/build-failure-triage.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/build-fixer.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/ci-health-trends.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/conflict-resolution.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/idempotency-and-safe-abort.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/communication/handoff-conventions.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/communication/single-channel-communication.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/communication/source-quote-discipline.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/completeness-gate.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/cost-aggregation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/cycle-aware-verification.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/db-agent-explore.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/forbidden-markers-scanner.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/fork-contribution-sync.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/index.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-db-build.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev/feedback-loop-optimizer.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev/install-quality-gates.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev-workflow.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/monorepo-package-scaffold.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/n-strikes-escalation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/playwright-visual-smoke.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/prior-attempts-scanner.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/release/semantic-release-setup.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/reporting/scheduled-report.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/runtime-call-tracer.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/scene-context-builder.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/source-discovery.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/tdd-triplet.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/__tests__/forbidden-markers-scanner.test.mjs\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ts-check.js\n---\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/analysis/process-mining.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/build-failure-triage.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/build-fixer.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/ci-health-trends.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/conflict-resolution.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ci/idempotency-and-safe-abort.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/communication/handoff-conventions.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/communication/single-channel-communication.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/communication/source-quote-discipline.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/completeness-gate.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/cost-aggregation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/cycle-aware-verification.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/db-agent-explore.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/forbidden-markers-scanner.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/fork-contribution-sync.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/index.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-db-build.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev/feedback-loop-optimizer.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev/install-quality-gates.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev-workflow.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/monorepo-package-scaffold.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/n-strikes-escalation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/playwright-visual-smoke.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/prior-attempts-scanner.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/release/semantic-release-setup.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/reporting/scheduled-report.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/runtime-call-tracer.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/scene-context-builder.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/source-discovery.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/tdd-triplet.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/__tests__/forbidden-markers-scanner.test.mjs\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/ts-check.js\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883574145}}
{"type":"message","id":"c67a53a2","parentId":"0e37f876","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:36.095Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"I see there are specializations. Let me look specifically for web development specializations and any database/auth/payment related processes.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:14","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"find /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations -maxdepth 1 -type d | sort | sed 's|.*/specializations/||' | head -100","timeout":30}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":46731,"output":90,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":46821,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883574147,"responseId":"chatcmpl-18","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"bb45d821","parentId":"c67a53a2","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:36.104Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:14","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations\nai-agents-conversational\nalgorithms-optimization\nauthoring\nbackend-development\nbusiness\ncli-mcp-development\ncode-migration-modernization\ncollaboration\ncommon-utilities\ncommunication\ncryptography-blockchain\ndata-engineering-analytics\ndata-science-ml\ndesktop-development\ndevops-sre-platform\ndomains\nembedded-systems\nfpga-programming\ngame-development\ngpu-programming\nmedia\nmeta\nmobile-development\nnetwork-programming\nobservability\nperformance-optimization\nproduct-management\nprogramming-languages\nqa-testing-automation\nresearch\nrobotics-simulation\nsdk-platform-development\nsecurity-compliance\nsecurity-research\nsoftware-architecture\nsourcing\ntechnical-documentation\nux-ui-design\nweb-development\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883576104}}
{"type":"message","id":"779226c8","parentId":"bb45d821","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:37.767Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"There's a web-development specialization. Let me explore it.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.bash:15","name":"bash","arguments":{"command":"find /home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development -type f | sort | head -200","timeout":30}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":47009,"output":62,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":47071,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883576106,"responseId":"chatcmpl-454","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"8238c8ce","parentId":"779226c8","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:37.781Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.bash:15","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/accessibility-audit-remediation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/accessibility-auditor/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/accessibility-auditor/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/accessibility-testing/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/accessibility-testing/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/angular-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/angular-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/animation-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/animation-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/api-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/api-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/api-documentation/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/api-documentation/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/architecture-documentation/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/architecture-documentation/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/auth-specialist/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/auth-specialist/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/backend-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/backend-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/bundle-analyzer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/bundle-analyzer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/ci-cd/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/ci-cd/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/code-quality/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/code-quality/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/code-reviewer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/code-reviewer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/component-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/component-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/component-documentation/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/component-documentation/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/container/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/container/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/dependency-audit/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/dependency-audit/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/deployment/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/deployment/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/e2e-testing/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/e2e-testing/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/environment-setup/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/environment-setup/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/forms-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/forms-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/frontend-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/frontend-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/fullstack-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/fullstack-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/graphql-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/graphql-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/hooks-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/hooks-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/lighthouse/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/lighthouse/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/micro-frontend-architect/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/micro-frontend-architect/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/nextjs-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/nextjs-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/performance-auditor/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/performance-auditor/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/performance-testing/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/performance-testing/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/react-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/react-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/security-auditor/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/security-auditor/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/security-hardening/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/security-hardening/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/seo-auditor/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/seo-auditor/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/technical-writer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/technical-writer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/unit-testing/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/unit-testing/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/visual-regression/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/visual-regression/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/vue-developer/AGENT.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/agents/vue-developer/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/angular-enterprise-development.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/api-integration-testing.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/aria-implementation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/aws-amplify-deployment.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/bundle-size-optimization.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/cicd-github-actions.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/component-library-radix.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/content-security-policy.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/cross-browser-compatibility.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/css-in-js-styled-components.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/dev-environment-onboarding.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/docker-containerization.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/e2e-testing-playwright.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/eslint-prettier-configuration.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/frontend-caching-service-workers.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/google-analytics-integration.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/graphql-api-apollo.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/image-optimization.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/jwt-authentication.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/keyboard-navigation-focus.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/mern-stack-development.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/mfa-implementation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/micro-frontend-module-federation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/mobile-first-responsive.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/mongodb-schema-design.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/nestjs-microservices.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/nextjs-fullstack-app.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/nuxtjs-fullstack-app.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/nx-monorepo.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/oauth-social-login.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/owasp-security-audit.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/postgresql-database-design.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/prisma-orm-integration.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/processes-backlog.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/pwa-development.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/rbac-implementation.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/react-app-development.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/react-query-server-state.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/redis-caching-strategy.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/redux-state-management.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/references.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/remix-fullstack-app.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/restful-api-nodejs.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/secrets-management.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/serverless-api-lambda.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/server-sent-events.js\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills-agents-backlog.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills-agents-references.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/analytics/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/analytics/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/angular-development/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/angular-development/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/apollo-server/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/apollo-server/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/aria/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/aria/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/aws-amplify/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/aws-amplify/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/browser-automation/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/bundle-optimization/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/bundle-optimization/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/caching/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/caching/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/core-web-vitals/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/csp/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/csp/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/css-modules/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/css-modules/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/cypress/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/cypress/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/design-tokens/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/design-tokens/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/docker-web/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/docker-web/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/drizzle/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/drizzle/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/esbuild/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/esbuild/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/eslint/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/eslint/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/express/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/express/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/fastify/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/fastify/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/frontend-e2e-testing/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/github-actions-web/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/github-actions-web/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/git/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/git/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/graphql/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/graphql/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/hydration/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/image-optimization/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/image-optimization/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/jest/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/jest/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/json-schema/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/json-schema/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/jwt/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/jwt/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/keyboard-navigation/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/keyboard-navigation/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/lit/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/lit/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/markdown/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/markdown/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/mongodb/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/mongodb/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/msw/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/msw/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nestjs/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nestjs/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/netlify/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/netlify/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nextauth/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nextauth/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nextjs-app-router/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nextjs-app-router/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nextjs/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/nextjs/SKILL.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/ngrx/README.md\n/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/skills/ngrx/SKILL.md\n"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883577781}}
{"type":"message","id":"a72ab460","parentId":"8238c8ce","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:41.011Z","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Great, I found relevant processes:\n- `nextjs-fullstack-app.js`\n- `react-app-development.js`\n- `jwt-authentication.js`\n- `postgresql-database-design.js`\n- `prisma-orm-integration.js`\n- `restful-api-nodejs.js`\n- `e2e-testing-playwright.js`\n- `oauth-social-login.js`\n- `mongodb-schema-design.js`\n- And relevant skills: nextjs, nextauth, drizzle, express, etc.\n\nLet me read some of these to understand their structure and use them as references. I especially need to understand the process file structure (defineTask, etc.).\n\nLet me read nextjs-fullstack-app.js and a shared process to understand the syntax.","thinkingSignature":"reasoning"},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.read:16","name":"read","arguments":{"path":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/specializations/web-development/nextjs-fullstack-app.js","limit":200}},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.read:17","name":"read","arguments":{"path":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/local-dev-workflow.js","limit":200}},{"type":"toolCall","id":"functions.read:18","name":"read","arguments":{"path":"/home/liph/.a5c/process-library/babysitter-repo/library/processes/shared/deterministic-quality-gate.js","limit":200}}],"api":"openai-completions","provider":"ollama","model":"kimi-k2.7-code:cloud","usage":{"input":52696,"output":269,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"reasoning":0,"totalTokens":52965,"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"total":0}},"stopReason":"toolUse","timestamp":1784883577783,"responseId":"chatcmpl-258","responseModel":"kimi-k2.7-code"}}
{"type":"message","id":"76d45a49","parentId":"a72ab460","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:41.018Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.read:16","toolName":"read","content":[{"type":"text","text":"/**\n * @process specializations/web-development/nextjs-fullstack-app\n * @description Next.js Full-Stack Application with App Router - Complete process for building full-stack applications with\n * Next.js 13+ App Router, React Server Components, server actions, API routes, database integration, and deployment.\n * @inputs { projectName: string, database?: string, auth?: string, styling?: string, deployment?: string }\n * @outputs { success: boolean, routes: array, serverComponents: array, apiRoutes: array, database: object, artifacts: array }\n *\n * @example\n * const result = await orchestrate('specializations/web-development/nextjs-fullstack-app', {\n * projectName: 'MyNextApp',\n * database: 'prisma-postgresql',\n * auth: 'nextauth',\n * styling: 'tailwind',\n * deployment: 'vercel'\n * });\n *\n * @references\n * - Next.js Documentation: https://nextjs.org/docs\n * - React Server Components: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/rendering/server-components\n * - Prisma: https://www.prisma.io/\n * - NextAuth.js: https://next-auth.js.org/\n * @graph\n * domains: [domain:web-development]\n * specializations: [specialization:web-development]\n * workflows: [workflow:feature-development]\n * roles: [role:fullstack-engineer, role:frontend-engineer]\n * skillAreas: [skill-area:server-side-rendering, skill-area:data-fetching-caching]\n * topics: [topic:streaming-ssr, topic:incremental-static-regeneration]\n */\n\nimport { defineTask } from '@a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk';\n\nexport async function process(inputs, ctx) {\n const {\n projectName,\n database = 'prisma-postgresql',\n auth = 'nextauth',\n styling = 'tailwind',\n deployment = 'vercel',\n outputDir = 'nextjs-fullstack-app'\n } = inputs;\n\n const startTime = ctx.now();\n const artifacts = [];\n\n ctx.log('info', `Starting Next.js Full-Stack Application: ${projectName}`);\n ctx.log('info', `Database: ${database}, Auth: ${auth}`);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 1: PROJECT SETUP\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 1: Setting up Next.js project with App Router');\n\n const projectSetup = await ctx.task(projectSetupTask, {\n projectName,\n styling,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...projectSetup.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 2: APP ROUTER CONFIGURATION\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 2: Configuring App Router and layouts');\n\n const appRouterSetup = await ctx.task(appRouterSetupTask, {\n projectName,\n projectSetup,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...appRouterSetup.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 3: REACT SERVER COMPONENTS\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 3: Implementing React Server Components');\n\n const serverComponents = await ctx.task(serverComponentsTask, {\n projectName,\n appRouterSetup,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...serverComponents.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 4: DATABASE INTEGRATION\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 4: Setting up database with Prisma');\n\n const databaseSetup = await ctx.task(databaseSetupTask, {\n projectName,\n database,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...databaseSetup.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 5: SERVER ACTIONS\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 5: Implementing Server Actions');\n\n const serverActions = await ctx.task(serverActionsTask, {\n projectName,\n databaseSetup,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...serverActions.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 6: API ROUTES\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 6: Creating API Routes');\n\n const apiRoutes = await ctx.task(apiRoutesTask, {\n projectName,\n databaseSetup,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...apiRoutes.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 7: AUTHENTICATION\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 7: Setting up authentication with NextAuth.js');\n\n const authSetup = await ctx.task(authSetupTask, {\n projectName,\n auth,\n databaseSetup,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...authSetup.artifacts);\n\n // ============================================================================\n // PHASE 8: CLIENT COMPONENTS\n // ============================================================================\n\n ctx.log('info', 'Phase 8: Building Client Components');\n\n let clientComponents = await ctx.task(clientComponentsTask, {\n projectName,\n styling,\n outputDir\n });\n\n artifacts.push(...clientComponents.artifacts);\n\n // TypeScript hard gate (issue #65)\n const tsCheck = await ctx.task(tsCheckTask, { projectName });\n\n // Cache-bust verification protocol (issue #89) - Next.js specific (.next + Turbopack HMR cache)\n const cacheBustResult = await ctx.task(cacheBustVerificationTask, { projectName, outputDir });\n artifacts.push(...(cacheBustResult.artifacts || []));\n const buildHashResult = await ctx.task(buildHashCheckTask, { projectName, outputDir });\n artifacts.push(...(buildHashResult.artifacts || []));\n const hardRefreshResult = await ctx.task(hardRefreshInstructionTask, { projectName, framework: 'nextjs' });\n artifacts.push(...(hardRefreshResult.artifacts || []));\n\n let lastFeedback = null;\n for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 3; attempt++) {\n if (lastFeedback) {\n clientComponents = await ctx.task(clientComponentsTask, { ...{\n projectName,\n styling,\n outputDir\n }, feedback: lastFeedback, attempt: attempt + 1 });\n }\n const finalApproval = await ctx.breakpoint({\n question: `Next.js full-stack setup complete for ${projectName}. ${appRouterSetup.routes.length} routes, ${serverComponents.components.length} server components. .next cache and Turbopack HMR cache cleared. Hard-refresh your browser (Cmd+Shift+R) to verify. Approve configuration?`,\n title: 'Next.js Full-Stack Review',\n context: {\n runId: ctx.runId,\n routes: appRouterSetup.routes,\n serverComponents: serverComponents.components,\n apiRoutes: apiRoutes.endpoints,\n files: artifacts.slice(-5).map(a => ({ path: a.path, format: a.format || 'typescript' }))\n },\n expert: 'owner',\n tags: ['approval-gate'],\n previousFeedback: lastFeedback || undefined,\n attempt: attempt > 0 ? attempt + 1 : undefined\n });\n if (finalApproval.approved) break;\n lastFeedback = finalApproval.response || finalApproval.feedback || 'Changes requested';\n }\n // ============================================================================\n\n[476 more lines in file. Use offset=201 to continue.]"}],"isError":false,"timestamp":1784883581018}}
{"type":"message","id":"d3d58bf7","parentId":"76d45a49","timestamp":"2026-07-24T08:59:41.018Z","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"functions.read:17","toolName":"read","content":[{"type":"text","text":"/**\n * @process processes/shared/local-dev-workflow\n * @description Local-dev relaxations — experimental commits OK while iterating, but tighten up before push.\n * @inputs { phase: \"iterating\"|\"pre-push\", pendingCommits?: Array