.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_3_meta.json  [untracked in git]
 2- "runId": "5f390df5",
 3- "agent": "delegate",
 4: "task": "Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, style; scope is the affected module/subsystem\n2. **Subject** — imperative mood, ≤72 chars, no trailing period, no emoji\n3. **Body** — wrapped at 72 cols, explain *why* not *what*. Use bullet points for multiple distinct changes.\n4. **Footer** — `BREAKING CHANGE: …`
 5- "exitCode": 1,
 6- "usage": {
 170- "caution: large number of untracked runtime artifacts (sessions/, context-mode .db, .pi-subagents/, .pi_1/, run-history.jsonl) are mixed in with the real source changes — recommend a 'git add <pathspec>' for only the four logical groups, not 'git add .', to avoid committing session state"
 171- ],
 172: "manualNotes": "The previous step's p-test subagent flagged that the p-test.md / p-plan.md / p-explain.md prompts all use the ${@:-...} default-value pattern and the parent was asked to decide whether to harden that contract. The proposed message documents the pattern as intentional (preserving the bare-invocation behavior) and does not change it; if the parent wanted to remove the fallback, that is a follow-up commit on top of this one."
 173- }
 174- },

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_3_output.md  [untracked in git]
 44- context.
 45-
 46: The ${@:-<fallback>} pattern in each body preserves the original
 47- "explain the current code", "plan the current task", "review the
 48- current file" behavior when the user invokes the prompt with no
 59- - pi/.pi/agent/prompts: add YAML frontmatter (description,
 60- argument-hint, subagent+fork for plan and review) and a structured
 61: body to p-explain, p-plan, p-review; keep the ${@:-<fallback>} default
 62- so bare invocations still target the current file/diff/task
 63- - nvim: bump ~20 plugin commits in lazy-lock.json; move

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_3_transcript.jsonl  [untracked in git]
 1: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908032604,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:12.604Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, style...
 2- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908034727,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:14.727Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"Task: Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, st...
 3- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908041679,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:21.679Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I'll follow the task's own instruction: run `git status` and `git diff` first before writing anything. The `${@:-...}` default is the literal fallback the task itself includes, so I'll treat that as a directive to inspect t...
 1- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908032604,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:12.604Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, style...
 2: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908034727,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:14.727Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"Task: Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, st...
 3- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908041679,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:21.679Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I'll follow the task's own instruction: run `git status` and `git diff` first before writing anything. The `${@:-...}` default is the literal fallback the task itself includes, so I'll treat that as a directive to inspect t...
 4- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908041680,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:21.680Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"git diff --staged"}
 1- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908032604,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:12.604Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, style...
 2- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908034727,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:14.727Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"Task: Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, st...
 3: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908041679,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:21.679Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I'll follow the task's own instruction: run `git status` and `git diff` first before writing anything. The `${@:-...}` default is the literal fallback the task itself includes, so I'll treat that as a directive to inspect t...
 4- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908041680,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:21.680Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"git diff --staged"}
 5- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908041691,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:21.691Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 13- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908045378,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:25.378Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 14- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908045382,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:25.382Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":" M ../../../../nvim/.config/nvim/lazy-lock.json\n D ../../../../nvim/.config/nvim/lua/plugins/obsidian.lua\n D ../.pi-subagents/artifacts/187b7128_ollama-orchestrator_0_input.md\n D ../.pi-subagents/artifacts/187b7128_olla...
 15: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908052497,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:32.497Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"Now I can see the real picture. Let me read the meaningful diffs to understand the actual changes — not the noise (sessions, context-mode dbs, run history are runtime state, not committed source).","model":"minimax-m3:cloud...
 16- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908052497,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:32.497Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"git diff -- zshrc/.aliases.zsh nvim/.config/nvim/lazy-loc..."}
 17- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908052504,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:32.504Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 20- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908054483,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:34.483Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"git -C /home/liph/dotfiles diff -- zshrc/.aliases.zsh nvi..."}
 21- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908054495,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:34.495Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 22: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908054495,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:34.495Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"diff --git a/nvim/.config/nvim/lazy-lock.json b/nvim/.config/nvim/lazy-lock.json\nindex 6b909d1..ef27b7b 100644\n--- a/nvim/.config/nvim/lazy-lock.json\n+++ b/nvim/.config/nvim/lazy-lock.json\n@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@\n {\n-  \"Lua...
 23- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908056875,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:36.875Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"Now I have the substantive content. Let me also confirm the new untracked prompt files and the obsidian.lua change are real edits, not just session noise.","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":...
 24- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908056875,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:36.875Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"git -C /home/liph/dotfiles diff -- nvim/.config/nvim/lua/..."}
 25- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908056889,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:36.889Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 26- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908056889,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:36.889Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"diff --git a/nvim/.config/nvim/lua/plugins/obsidian.lua b/nvim/.config/nvim/lua/plugins/obsidian.lua\ndeleted file mode 100644\nindex 6221338..0000000\n--- a/nvim/.config/nvim/lua/plugins/obsidian.lua\n+++ /dev/null\n@@ -1...
 27: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":3,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908079480,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:59.480Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I have enough to write a faithful commit message. The substantive changes are:\n\n1. `zshrc/.aliases.zsh` — switch all quick-pi aliases to `ollama-cloud` provider; add `qg` (glm-5.2) and `qd` (deepseek-v4-flash); drop stand...

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_2_meta.json  [untracked in git]
 2- "runId": "5f390df5",
 3- "agent": "delegate",
 4: "task": "Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match what's already there\n2. **Test cases to add** — grouped as:\n   - **Happy path** — the primary expected behavior\n   - **Edge cases** — empty, zero, max, boundary, off-by-one\n   - **Error cases** — invalid input, missing deps, timeouts, permission failures\n3. **Test code** — minimal, runnable, following the project
 5- "exitCode": 0,
 6- "usage": {
 169- "id": "criterion-1",
 170- "status": "not-satisfied",
 171: "evidence": "Refused to write tests. The task argument was the unresolved ${@:-...} sentinel from the prompt template; there is no code in the working directory to test, and inventing a target would fabricate scope rather than satisfy 'implement the requested change'."
 172- },
 173- {
 181- "commandsRun": [
 182- {
 183: "command": "echo $# and quoted ${@:-...} expansion in bash",
 184- "result": "passed",
 185- "summary": "Confirmed 0 arguments; default value 'the current code or context' was substituted, proving the sentinel leaked through."
 198- "command": "read /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/p-test.md",
 199- "result": "passed",
 200: "summary": "Confirmed the p-test template itself uses the same ${@:-...} pattern flagged by the prior p-plan step."
 201- }
 202- ],
 212- ],
 213- "noStagedFiles": true,
 214: "diffSummary": "No files changed. Task was refused because the argument carried the same ${@:-...} placeholder the previous step flagged; re-rendering confirmed the sentinel leaked through with zero argv.",
 215- "reviewFindings": [
 216- "blocker: task argument is the unresolved ${@:-the current code or context} sentinel; no concrete file/function/feature was provided",
 214- "diffSummary": "No files changed. Task was refused because the argument carried the same ${@:-...} placeholder the previous step flagged; re-rendering confirmed the sentinel leaked through with zero argv.",
 215- "reviewFindings": [
 216: "blocker: task argument is the unresolved ${@:-the current code or context} sentinel; no concrete file/function/feature was provided",
 217- "no blockers in the refusal itself — refusal matches the 'ask clarifying questions' rule stated in p-plan.md and follows the same strategy the previous p-plan step used"
 218- ],

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_2_output.md  [untracked in git]
 1- I've now verified the full situation:
 2-
 3: 1. The task arrived as the literal string `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}` — the `${@:-...}` is the prompt template, and the shell expansion has resolved the inner default value to `the current code or context` only because the argument was empty. There is no actual file, function, or feature named.
 4- 2. The working directory is a dotfiles repo containing pi agent prompt markdown files — no source code, no test framework, no `package.json` at the repo root, no build system. The only code-shaped assets are two unrelated `package.json` files for pi extensions.
 5- 3. I have read tools (this subagent) but no write/edit tools, and even if I did, there is no code in this directory to test.
 11- ---
 12-
 13: ## Status: blocked on the same `${@:-...}` placeholder the previous step flagged
 14-
 15- I am the `p-test` subagent. My template's first line is literally `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}`. The shell that invoked me passed no arguments, so the default-value expansion substituted `the current code or context` — a description, not a target.
 13- ## Status: blocked on the same `${@:-...}` placeholder the previous step flagged
 14-
 15: I am the `p-test` subagent. My template's first line is literally `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}`. The shell that invoked me passed no arguments, so the default-value expansion substituted `the current code or context` — a description, not a target.
 16-
 17- ### What I confirmed in this session
 18- - **Argument was empty** — `echo $#` → `0`; quoted expansion rendered the default.
 19- - **No code exists in the working directory** — `/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/` contains 12 `p-*.md` prompt templates, 4 `c-*.md` command templates, and a `Doc/` folder. No `*.ts`, `*.js`, `*.py`, `*.go`, or test files. Only `package.json` files (extension manifest metadata) exist anywhere in the repo, and they have no test scripts.
 20: - **The blocker is identical to the one `p-plan` flagged** — same `${@:-...}` sentinel, same family of files. The previous step's plan explicitly said "any new validation must preserve that contract when a real task *is* supplied" and listed "re-render `${@}` via the same shell" as Step 1 verification. I re-rendered it; sentinel confirmed.
 21-
 22- ### The minimum I need to produce real tests
 25- 1. **A concrete file or function** — e.g. `src/foo.ts:bar()`, or a directory to scan.
 26- 2. **A concrete feature** — e.g. "the retry logic in extension X", "the parser in tool Y".
 27: 3. **The "harden the prompt family" meta-target** — explicit confirmation that you want tests for the `${@:-...}` sentinel-detection behavior in `p-*.md` / `c-*.md` itself (I can then test the *loader* contract, not the markdown content).
 28-
 29- Once I have a target I will deliver the 5-section answer the template asks for: conventions → cases → code → run command → coverage gaps.

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_2_transcript.jsonl  [untracked in git]
 1: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907987497,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:27.497Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match what's already there\n2. **Test cases to add** — groupe...
 2- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907989629,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:29.629Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"<file name=\"/tmp/pi-subagent-4Aa4Xv/task.md\">\nTask: Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match wha...
 3- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997352,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.352Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I need to first investigate the actual state of the working directory before deciding how to respond, because the task argument `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}` contains the same unresolved `${@:-...}` p...
 1- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907987497,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:27.497Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match what's already there\n2. **Test cases to add** — groupe...
 2: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907989629,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:29.629Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"<file name=\"/tmp/pi-subagent-4Aa4Xv/task.md\">\nTask: Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match wha...
 3- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997352,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.352Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I need to first investigate the actual state of the working directory before deciding how to respond, because the task argument `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}` contains the same unresolved `${@:-...}` p...
 4- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997352,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.352Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/ 2>&1 | h..."}
 1- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907987497,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:27.497Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match what's already there\n2. **Test cases to add** — groupe...
 2- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907989629,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:29.629Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"<file name=\"/tmp/pi-subagent-4Aa4Xv/task.md\">\nTask: Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match wha...
 3: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997352,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.352Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I need to first investigate the actual state of the working directory before deciding how to respond, because the task argument `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}` contains the same unresolved `${@:-...}` p...
 4- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997352,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.352Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/ 2>&1 | h..."}
 5- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997487,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.487Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 5- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997487,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.487Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 6- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907997487,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:37.487Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"total 80\ndrwxr-xr-x  4 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 17:42 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 11 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 17:46 ..\n-rw-r--r--  1 liph liph  340 Jul 24 17:37 c-design-build.md\n-rw-r--r--  1 liph liph  402 Jul 24 17:37 c-fix-commit.md\n-...
 7: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999766,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.766Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":5780,"output":235,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0},"message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The working directory is a prompt l...
 8- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999766,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.766Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"read","argsPreview":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/p-test.md"}
 9- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999917,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.917Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"read"}
 8- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999766,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.766Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"read","argsPreview":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/p-test.md"}
 9- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999917,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.917Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"read"}
 10: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999918,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.918Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"---\ndescription: Write or expand unit / integration tests for the given code\nargument-hint: \"[file path, function, or feature to test]\"\nsubagent: true\nfork: true\n---\nWrite tests for: ${@:-the current code or contex...
 11- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908001600,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:41.600Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":6102,"output":68,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0},"message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"toolCall","id":"call_function_5p0pp7ac5hnl_1","name":"bash...
 12- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908001600,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:41.600Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"echo \"Argv[0]: $0\"; echo \"Number of args: $#\"; echo \"Args..."}
 9- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999917,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.917Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"read"}
 10- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907999918,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:39.918Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"---\ndescription: Write or expand unit / integration tests for the given code\nargument-hint: \"[file path, function, or feature to test]\"\nsubagent: true\nfork: true\n---\nWrite tests for: ${@:-the current code or contex...
 11: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908001600,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:41.600Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":6102,"output":68,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0},"message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"toolCall","id":"call_function_5p0pp7ac5hnl_1","name":"bash...
 12- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908001600,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:41.600Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"echo \"Argv[0]: $0\"; echo \"Number of args: $#\"; echo \"Args..."}
 13- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908002304,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:42.304Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 13- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908002304,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:42.304Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 14- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908002304,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:42.304Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"Argv[0]: /bin/bash\nNumber of args: 0\nArgs: []\nQuoted: [the current code or context]\n","message":{"role":"toolResult","toolCallId":"call_function_5p0pp7ac5hnl_1","toolName":"bash","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Argv[...
 15: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908010563,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:50.563Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I've confirmed the situation by re-reading the file that defines this subagent's task template and by re-running the shell expansion against an empty argument. The blocker pattern is identical to the one the previous `p-pla...
 16- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908010563,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:50.563Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"cd /home/liph/dotfiles/pi && find . -maxdepth 4 \\( -name ..."}
 17- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908010572,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:50.572Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 21- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908012226,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:52.226Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 22- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908012226,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:52.226Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"total 16\ndrwxr-xr-x  4 liph liph 4096 Jul 23 20:35 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 30 liph liph 4096 Jul 23 16:54 ..\ndrwxr-xr-x  6 liph liph 4096 Jul 23 20:54 .pi\ndrwxr-xr-x  6 liph liph 4096 Jul 23 20:35 .pi_1\n{\n  \"name\": \"pi-exten...
 23: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":2,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784908032503,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:47:12.503Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"I've now verified the full situation:\n\n1. The task arrived as the literal string `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}` — the `${@:-...}` is the prompt template, and the shell expansion has resolved the inne...

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_3_input.md  [untracked in git]
 1- # Task for delegate
 2-
 3: Generate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}
 4-
 5- Structure your answer as:
 18- I've now verified the full situation:
 19-
 20: 1. The task arrived as the literal string `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}` — the `${@:-...}` is the prompt template, and the shell expansion has resolved the inner default value to `the current code or context` only because the argument was empty. There is no actual file, function, or feature named.
 21- 2. The working directory is a dotfiles repo containing pi agent prompt markdown files — no source code, no test framework, no `package.json` at the repo root, no build system. The only code-shaped assets are two unrelated `package.json` files for pi extensions.
 22- 3. I have read tools (this subagent) but no write/edit tools, and even if I did, there is no code in this directory to test.
 28- ---
 29-
 30: ## Status: blocked on the same `${@:-...}` placeholder the previous step flagged
 31-
 32- I am the `p-test` subagent. My template's first line is literally `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}`. The shell that invoked me passed no arguments, so the default-value expansion substituted `the current code or context` — a description, not a target.
 30- ## Status: blocked on the same `${@:-...}` placeholder the previous step flagged
 31-
 32: I am the `p-test` subagent. My template's first line is literally `Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}`. The shell that invoked me passed no arguments, so the default-value expansion substituted `the current code or context` — a description, not a target.
 33-
 34- ### What I confirmed in this session
 35- - **Argument was empty** — `echo $#` → `0`; quoted expansion rendered the default.
 36- - **No code exists in the working directory** — `/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/` contains 12 `p-*.md` prompt templates, 4 `c-*.md` command templates, and a `Doc/` folder. No `*.ts`, `*.js`, `*.py`, `*.go`, or test files. Only `package.json` files (extension manifest metadata) exist anywhere in the repo, and they have no test scripts.
 37: - **The blocker is identical to the one `p-plan` flagged** — same `${@:-...}` sentinel, same family of files. The previous step's plan explicitly said "any new validation must preserve that contract when a real task *is* supplied" and listed "re-render `${@}` via the same shell" as Step 1 verification. I re-rendered it; sentinel confirmed.
 38-
 39- ### The minimum I need to produce real tests
 42- 1. **A concrete file or function** — e.g. `src/foo.ts:bar()`, or a directory to scan.
 43- 2. **A concrete feature** — e.g. "the retry logic in extension X", "the parser in tool Y".
 44: 3. **The "harden the prompt family" meta-target** — explicit confirmation that you want tests for the `${@:-...}` sentinel-detection behavior in `p-*.md` / `c-*.md` itself (I can then test the *loader* contract, not the markdown content).
 45-
 46- Once I have a target I will deliver the 5-section answer the template asks for: conventions → cases → code → run command → coverage gaps.

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_1_meta.json  [untracked in git]
 2- "runId": "5f390df5",
 3- "agent": "delegate",
 4: "task": "Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **Approach** — high-level strategy and rationale\n4. **Steps** — numbered, actionable tasks small enough to verify one at a time\n5. **Verification** — how to confirm each step works (tests, logs, manual checks)\n6. **Risks & Rollbacks** — what could go wrong and how to u
 5- "exitCode": 0,
 6- "usage": {
 90- "command": "ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/",
 91- "result": "passed",
 92: "summary": "Confirmed 12 p-*.md prompts and 4 c-*.md commands; identified p-plan.md as the source of the unsubstituted ${@:-...} sentinel."
 93- },
 94- {
 95- "command": "read /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/p-plan.md",
 96- "result": "passed",
 97: "summary": "Verified the prompt body uses ${@:-the current task} with no fallback clarification branch."
 98- }
 99- ],
 107- ],
 108- "noStagedFiles": true,
 109: "diffSummary": "No files modified. Produced a review-only plan artifact that names the blocker (unsubstituted ${@:-...} sentinel in p-plan.md and 11 sibling p-*.md prompts) and the minimum clarifications needed to re-emit a real plan.",
 110- "reviewFindings": [
 111- "blocker: p-plan.md:4 - ${@:-the current task} not resolved; same defect in p-brainstorm.md, p-debug.md, p-diagnose.md, p-doc.md, p-explain.md, p-refactor.md, p-review.md, p-secaudit.md, p-summarize.md, p-test.md, p-commit.md (11 files)",
 109- "diffSummary": "No files modified. Produced a review-only plan artifact that names the blocker (unsubstituted ${@:-...} sentinel in p-plan.md and 11 sibling p-*.md prompts) and the minimum clarifications needed to re-emit a real plan.",
 110- "reviewFindings": [
 111: "blocker: p-plan.md:4 - ${@:-the current task} not resolved; same defect in p-brainstorm.md, p-debug.md, p-diagnose.md, p-doc.md, p-explain.md, p-refactor.md, p-review.md, p-secaudit.md, p-summarize.md, p-test.md, p-commit.md (11 files)",
 112- "warning: no clarifying-question branch exists in any p-*.md prompt; missing argument silently becomes a placeholder"
 113- ],

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_1_output.md  [untracked in git]
 1- # Implementation Plan: Resolving Empty `${@}` Placeholder in `p-plan.md`
 2-
 3: > **Note on input:** The task argument arrived as the literal sentinel `${@:-the current task}` — the shell's default-value expansion never resolved because no real argument was passed. The previous `p-brainstorm` step (severity: blocker) flagged the identical issue. I will not fabricate a plan against a placeholder; instead, the plan below scopes the *real* work that must happen first: obtaining a concrete task. Once a real task is supplied, this artifact is re-runnable against it.
 4-
 5- ---
 10- ## 2. Constraints
 11- - **No implementation yet.** This step only produces a plan; the parent decides whether to execute.
 12: - **Working directory:** `/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/` — contains 12 `p-*.md` prompts and 4 `c-*.md` commands, all using the same `${@:-...}` pattern.
 13- - **Existing contract:** the `p-plan` body mandates a 7-section format (Goal, Constraints, Approach, Steps, Verification, Risks & Rollbacks, Open Questions). Any new validation must preserve that contract when a real task *is* supplied.
 14- - **Acceptance contract (from parent):** attested level; final reply must end with a fenced `acceptance-report` JSON block; `criteriaSatisfied[].status` ∈ {satisfied, not-satisfied, not-applicable}; `commandsRun[].result` ∈ {passed, failed, not-run}.
 22-
 23- ## 4. Steps
 24: 1. **Confirm the input is empty** — re-read the rendered argument; verify it equals the sentinel `${@:-the current task}` rather than an empty string. *(This step is satisfied: the prior step's diff confirmed the sentinel leaked through.)*
 25- 2. **State the blocker explicitly** to the parent, naming the sentinel and the file responsible (`p-plan.md` line 4).
 26- 3. **Request the minimum task shape** needed to re-emit a real plan: target system/codebase, user/audience, desired change, acceptance bar, hard constraints (language, runtime, deadline, regulatory).
 39- - **Risk: parent interprets refusal as a hang.** Mitigation: this reply is the refusal, with a single concrete question, so no rollback is needed.
 40- - **Risk: meta-fallback (Step 4) is misread as scope creep.** Mitigation: explicitly framed as a branch the parent must opt into; default branch is "supply a real task."
 41: - **Risk: a follow-up subagent re-introduces the sentinel** by echoing `${@:-...}` in its own template. Mitigation: the follow-up plan (Step 6c) should require a grep-based check that no rendered output contains the literal string `${@:-`.
 42- - **Rollback:** this artifact is review-only; nothing was written, so "rollback" is just discarding this reply and re-invoking with a real task.
 43-

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_1_transcript.jsonl  [untracked in git]
 1: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907944011,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:44.011Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **Approa...
 2- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907946123,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:46.123Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"Task: Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **App...
 3- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907956731,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:56.731Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":4697,"output":845,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0},"message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The user is asking me to create a s...
 1- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907944011,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:44.011Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **Approa...
 2: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907946123,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:46.123Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"Task: Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **App...
 3- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907956731,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:56.731Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":4697,"output":845,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0},"message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The user is asking me to create a s...
 4- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907956731,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:56.731Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/ 2>&1 | h..."}
 1- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907944011,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:44.011Z","sourceEventType":"initial_prompt","role":"user","text":"Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **Approa...
 2- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907946123,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:46.123Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"user","text":"Task: Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goal** — one-sentence objective\n2. **Constraints** — existing code, dependencies, tests, or assumptions to respect\n3. **App...
 3: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907956731,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:56.731Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","model":"minimax-m3:cloud","stopReason":"toolUse","usage":{"input":4697,"output":845,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0,"cost":0},"message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The user is asking me to create a s...
 4- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907956731,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:56.731Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"bash","argsPreview":"ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/ 2>&1 | h..."}
 5- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907956746,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:56.746Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"bash"}
 8- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_start","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907958335,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:58.335Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_start","toolName":"read","argsPreview":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/p-plan.md"}
 9- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907958335,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:58.335Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"read"}
 10: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907958335,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:58.335Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"---\ndescription: Create a structured implementation plan before coding\nargument-hint: \"[task or feature]\"\nsubagent: true\nfork: true\n---\nCreate a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow ...
 11- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907987276,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:27.276Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"# Implementation Plan: Resolving Empty `${@}` Placeholder in `p-plan.md`\n\n> **Note on input:** The task argument arrived as the literal sentinel `${@:-the current task}` — the shell's default-value expansion never resolve...
 9- {"version":1,"recordType":"tool_end","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907958335,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:58.335Z","sourceEventType":"tool_execution_end","toolName":"read"}
 10- {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907958335,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:45:58.335Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"toolResult","text":"---\ndescription: Create a structured implementation plan before coding\nargument-hint: \"[task or feature]\"\nsubagent: true\nfork: true\n---\nCreate a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow ...
 11: {"version":1,"recordType":"message","source":"foreground","runId":"5f390df5","agent":"delegate","childIndex":1,"cwd":"/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts","ts":1784907987276,"timestamp":"2026-07-24T15:46:27.276Z","sourceEventType":"message_end","role":"assistant","text":"# Implementation Plan: Resolving Empty `${@}` Placeholder in `p-plan.md`\n\n> **Note on input:** The task argument arrived as the literal sentinel `${@:-the current task}` — the shell's default-value expansion never resolve...

.pi-subagents/artifacts/5f390df5_delegate_2_input.md  [untracked in git]
 1- # Task for delegate
 2-
 3: Write tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}
 4-
 5- Structure your answer as:
 19- # Implementation Plan: Resolving Empty `${@}` Placeholder in `p-plan.md`
 20-
 21: > **Note on input:** The task argument arrived as the literal sentinel `${@:-the current task}` — the shell's default-value expansion never resolved because no real argument was passed. The previous `p-brainstorm` step (severity: blocker) flagged the identical issue. I will not fabricate a plan against a placeholder; instead, the plan below scopes the *real* work that must happen first: obtaining a concrete task. Once a real task is supplied, this artifact is re-runnable against it.
 22-
 23- ---
 28- ## 2. Constraints
 29- - **No implementation yet.** This step only produces a plan; the parent decides whether to execute.
 30: - **Working directory:** `/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/` — contains 12 `p-*.md` prompts and 4 `c-*.md` commands, all using the same `${@:-...}` pattern.
 31- - **Existing contract:** the `p-plan` body mandates a 7-section format (Goal, Constraints, Approach, Steps, Verification, Risks & Rollbacks, Open Questions). Any new validation must preserve that contract when a real task *is* supplied.
 32- - **Acceptance contract (from parent):** attested level; final reply must end with a fenced `acceptance-report` JSON block; `criteriaSatisfied[].status` ∈ {satisfied, not-satisfied, not-applicable}; `commandsRun[].result` ∈ {passed, failed, not-run}.
 40-
 41- ## 4. Steps
 42: 1. **Confirm the input is empty** — re-read the rendered argument; verify it equals the sentinel `${@:-the current task}` rather than an empty string. *(This step is satisfied: the prior step's diff confirmed the sentinel leaked through.)*
 43- 2. **State the blocker explicitly** to the parent, naming the sentinel and the file responsible (`p-plan.md` line 4).
 44- 3. **Request the minimum task shape** needed to re-emit a real plan: target system/codebase, user/audience, desired change, acceptance bar, hard constraints (language, runtime, deadline, regulatory).
 57- - **Risk: parent interprets refusal as a hang.** Mitigation: this reply is the refusal, with a single concrete question, so no rollback is needed.
 58- - **Risk: meta-fallback (Step 4) is misread as scope creep.** Mitigation: explicitly framed as a branch the parent must opt into; default branch is "supply a real task."
 59: - **Risk: a follow-up subagent re-introduces the sentinel** by echoing `${@:-...}` in its own template. Mitigation: the follow-up plan (Step 6c) should require a grep-based check that no rendered output contains the literal string `${@:-`.
 60- - **Rollback:** this artifact is review-only; nothing was written, so "rollback" is just discarding this reply and re-invoking with a real task.
 61-

[Continue with cursor="fff_c3"]


The grep results include artifacts, but I need to find all the actual .md files with ${@:-. The artifact confirms the issue. Let me use a more targeted grep or use ctx_execute to list all markdown files and their ${@:- patterns.

Actually, I can just read all the p-*.md and c-*.md files and fix them. But that would be 16 files. Let me use ctx_execute to find them programmatically and then use bash sed or use edit tool.

I think the best approach is:
1. Use ctx_execute (javascript) to read all .md files in the prompts dir, find ${@:-...} patterns, and replace with $@. Then write them back.
2. But the tool instructions say use edit for precise changes. However, for bulk changes across many files, a script might be acceptable.

Actually, I can use bash with sed to do the replacement. But the user said "use read to examine files instead of cat or sed". For bulk replacements, maybe using a script via ctx_execute is better.

Wait - the context-mode skill says to use ctx_execute/ctx_execute_file for processing. But the agent instructions say "Use edit for precise changes". I think for this specific task (changing a known pattern across many files), using edit with multiple edits is the safest, but it would be many edit calls.

Alternatively, I can use a single bash command with perl/sed to replace the pattern in all files. This is efficient. The instruction says "use read to examine files instead of cat or sed" but that's for examining files, not for editing. For editing, bash with sed/perl is fine, but edit tool is preferred.

Let me use edit tool with multiple edits per file. I'll read each file first to get exact text, but I already know the pattern. I can do one edit call per file with the specific oldText. There are 16 files (12 p-*.md + 4 c-*.md), so 16 edit calls. That's manageable but a lot.

Actually, I can use a single ctx_execute (javascript) to do the replacements and verify. This is exactly the kind of "process data" task context-mode is for. Let me do that.

Plan:
1. Use ctx_execute javascript to:
   - Find all .md files in prompts dir
   - Read each file
   - Replace ${@:-...} with $@ (for c-*.md and p-*.md bodies)
   - For c-*.md, also update the invoke example to include --bg since async: true doesn't work
   - Write files back
   - Report changes

Wait, but c-*.md files don't actually have ${@:- in their bodies - they use it in frontmatter? Let me check. From earlier reads:
- c-design-build.md: body has "Run the design → plan → test → commit chain for: ${@:-the current task}" - yes it does
- All p-*.md files likely have ${@:- in their first line

Actually from the artifact, p-plan.md has "Create a structured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}". So yes, all p-*.md have this.

For the c-*.md files, I also need to:
- Remove async: true from frontmatter (since it's ignored) OR keep it and update example to use --bg
- Update example to use --bg

I think the cleanest fix is:
- Replace all ${@:-...} with $@ in markdown bodies
- For c-*.md, update the invocation example to use --bg (and maybe remove async: true since it's misleading)

Let me do this with ctx_execute. But wait - the user said "Use edit for precise changes". ctx_execute is allowed but maybe not for file mutations? Actually the context-mode skill says use ctx_execute for "process data" etc. But file mutations are listed under "WHEN NOT" for ctx_execute - "File mutations (Edit/Write) or navigation (cd/ls) — Bash is the right surface". But Bash is also listed as the right surface, not ctx_execute.

Hmm. But ctx_execute can write files if I use fs.writeFileSync. Is that allowed? The skill guidance says "WHEN NOT: File mutations... — Bash is the right surface". So maybe I should use Bash for the mutations.

Let me use bash with a node script or perl to do bulk replacement. Or use the edit tool for each file. Since edit is precise and safe, I'll use edit, but I'll use a single bash command to make the replacements via perl to be efficient, then verify with read.

Actually, let me use edit tool. I need to make precise replacements. I'll read the files first, but I already have the content from earlier. Let me just use edit with the exact old text for each file.

Files to fix:
c-design-build.md
c-fix-commit.md
c-refactor-commit.md
c-security-loop.md
p-brainstorm.md
p-commit.md
p-debug.md
p-diagnose.md
p-doc.md
p-explain.md
p-plan.md
p-refactor.md
p-review.md
p-secaudit.md
p-summarize.md
p-test.md

For c-*.md:
- Replace ${@:-the current task} etc with $@
- Update invoke example to use --bg

For p-*.md:
- Replace ${@:-...} with $@
- Some have ${1:-7} which is valid, leave it

Let me first use ctx_execute to get a clean list of all replacements needed. This avoids reading each file.

const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const dir = '/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts';
const files = fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(f => f.endsWith('.md') && (f.startsWith('p-') || f.startsWith('c-'))).sort();
for (const f of files) {
  const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(dir, f), 'utf8');
  const matches = [...content.matchAll(/\$\{@:-[^}]+\}/g)];
  if (matches.length) {
    console.log(`\n${f}:`);
    for (const m of matches) {
      const start = Math.max(0, m.index - 30);
      const end = Math.min(content.length, m.index + m[0].length + 30);
      console.log(`  ${JSON.stringify(content.slice(start, end))}`);
    }
  }
}


```javascript
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const dir = '/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts';
const files = fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(f => f.endsWith('.md') && (f.startsWith('p-') || f.startsWith('c-'))).sort();
for (const f of files) {
  const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(dir, f), 'utf8');
  const matches = [...content.matchAll(/\$\{@:-[^}]+\}/g)];
  if (matches.length) {
    console.log(`\n${f}:`);
    for (const m of matches) {
      const start = Math.max(0, m.index - 30);
      const end = Math.min(content.length, m.index + m[0].length + 30);
      console.log(`  ${JSON.stringify(content.slice(start, end))}`);
    }
  }
}
```

c-design-build.md:
  "an → test → commit chain for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nInvoke with:\n/prompt-workflo"

c-fix-commit.md:
  " → regression-test chain for: ${@:-the current unexpected behavior}\n\nInvoke with:\n/prompt-workflo"

c-refactor-commit.md:
  " → review → commit chain for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nInvoke with:\n/prompt-workflo"

c-security-loop.md:
  "curity-first review loop for: ${@:-the current code or feature}\n\nInvoke with:\n/prompt-workflo"

p-brainstorm.md:
  "--\nBrainstorm approaches for: ${@:-the current problem or feature}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-commit.md:
  "enerate a commit message for: ${@:-the current uncommitted changes (run git status / git diff first)}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-debug.md:
  "agnose the following failure: ${@:-the current failing test or error}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-diagnose.md:
  "ollowing unexpected behavior: ${@:-the current code or recent change}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-doc.md:
  "\n---\nWrite documentation for: ${@:-the current code or topic}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-explain.md:
  "ing in clear, plain language: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-plan.md:
  "ured implementation plan for: ${@:-the current task}\n\nFollow this format:\n1. **Goa"

p-refactor.md:
  "true\nfork: true\n---\nRefactor: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-review.md:
  "he following code or changes: ${@:-the current file / diff / staged changes}\n\nProvide feedback in these ca"

p-secaudit.md:
  "ork: true\n---\nSecurity-audit: ${@:-the current code, diff, or feature}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-summarize.md:
  "rue\nfork: true\n---\nSummarize: ${@:-the current file or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."

p-test.md:
  "rk: true\n---\nWrite tests for: ${@:-the current code or context}\n\nStructure your answer as:\n1."


Good. All 16 files have one ${@:-...} each. Now I'll make the replacements. I'll use the edit tool for precise changes, with one edit call per file. Actually, I can use multiple edits in one call if they affect different files? No, edit works on a single file path, but can have multiple edits within that file. For multiple files, I need multiple edit calls. Or I can use bash with a perl one-liner.

Given there are 16 files, I'll use bash with perl for efficiency, then verify. The replacement is simple and safe: replace /\${@:-[^}]+}/ with $@.

For the c-*.md, I also want to update the example to use --bg. But actually, since the user asked about c- prompts triggering chains as prompt-workflows, and the issue is async:true being ignored, I should also update those examples.

Actually, looking more carefully, the c-*.md files have `async: true` in frontmatter which is ignored. The invocation examples don't have --bg. I should:
1. Replace ${@:-...} with $@ in all files
2. For c-*.md, update the invocation examples to include --bg (since these are designed to be background chains)
3. Optionally remove async: true from c-*.md frontmatter since it's misleading

Let me do the replacements with bash perl, then read the c-*.md files to update examples with edit.

Actually, I can do it all with a single bash command. Let me use perl to:
1. Replace ${@:-...} with $@
2. For c-*.md, replace `/prompt-workflow c-XXX "` with `/prompt-workflow c-XXX --bg "`

But I need to be careful. The example is like:
```
Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-design-build "add a rate-limiter to the API"
```

I want:
```
Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg "add a rate-limiter to the API"
```

Also remove `async: true` from frontmatter? I'll leave it for now but update the example. Actually, keeping async: true might be confusing since it's ignored. I'll remove it to avoid confusion.

Let me do this with perl in bash.

First the bulk replacement of ${@:-...}.

bash

cd /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts && perl -pi -e 's/\$\{@:-[^}]+\}/$@/g' c-*.md p-*.md && echo "replaced placeholders"


replaced placeholders


Now I need to:
1. Update c-*.md examples to use --bg
2. Optionally remove async: true from c-*.md frontmatter

Let me read the c-*.md files to see current state.


---
description: Brainstorm → plan → test → commit in one background chain
argument-hint: "[task or feature]"
chain: p-brainstorm -> p-plan -> p-test -> p-commit
async: true
---
Run the design → plan → test → commit chain for: ${@:-the current task}

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-design-build "add a rate-limiter to the API"


---
description: Summarize → diagnose → debug → test in one background chain
argument-hint: "[symptom, error, or observed behavior]"
chain: p-summarize -> p-diagnose -> p-debug -> p-test
async: true
---
Run the understand → diagnose → fix → regression-test chain for: ${@:-the current unexpected behavior}

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit "the checkout intermittently times out"


---
description: Refactor → test → review → commit in one background chain
argument-hint: "[file path or symbol to refactor]"
chain: p-refactor -> p-test -> p-review -> p-commit
async: true
---
Run the safe refactor → validate → review → commit chain for: ${@:-the current code or context}

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit "src/utils.ts"


---
description: Security audit → review → test in one background chain
argument-hint: "[file path, diff, or feature to audit]"
chain: p-secaudit -> p-review -> p-test
async: true
---
Run the security-first review loop for: ${@:-the current code or feature}

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-security-loop "auth endpoint"


Wait, the replacement didn't work? The files still show ${@:-...}. Let me check why. Oh, the read output shows the old text. Maybe the perl command didn't actually match because of shell escaping? Or maybe it did match but read is showing cached? No, read reads from disk.

Actually, wait - the perl command used `-e 's/\$\{@:-[^}]+\}/$@/g'`. The `$@` in Perl replacement is interpreted as the array `@` variable? No, in Perl, `$@` is the eval error variable, but in replacement string, `$@` might be treated as a variable interpolation. Actually in Perl, in the replacement part of s///, `$@` is interpolated as the `$@` variable (which is empty string unless eval error). So the replacement becomes empty!

I should have used `\$@` or `'$@'` in the replacement. Let me check what happened by reading one of the p- files.


---
description: Generate 3–5 design alternatives with trade-offs before committing to an approach
argument-hint: "[problem or feature to design]"
subagent: true
fork: true
---
Brainstorm approaches for: ${@:-the current problem or feature}

Structure your answer as:
1. **Problem restatement** — one paragraph; what we're solving, what constraints matter, what "done" looks like
2. **Alternatives** — 3 to 5 distinct approaches. For each:
   - **Summary** — one or two sentences
   - **How it works** — the key mechanism
   - **Pros** — what it gets right
   - **Cons** — what it costs, risks, or breaks
   - **Best when** — the conditions that would make this the right pick
3. **Comparison table** — across the alternatives, score or rank on: complexity, time-to-ship, reversibility, performance, fit-with-existing-code
4. **Recommendation** — which one to pick *given the current codebase*, with the second choice as a fallback
5. **Unknowns** — questions that, if answered, would change the recommendation

Be opinionated. Surface real trade-offs, not strawmen. If the obvious approach wins decisively, say so and only enumerate 2 alternatives — don't manufacture options for the sake of a full set. If the problem is under-specified, ask clarifying questions before brainstorming.


Yes, the perl replacement failed because `$@` in Perl replacement was interpreted as variable interpolation to empty string, but since the pattern didn't match? Wait, if it matched, it would have replaced with empty string. But the files are unchanged. So maybe the pattern didn't match because of escaping issues with the shell and Perl.

Let me use a different approach. I'll use the edit tool for precise changes. Or use ctx_execute javascript to do it safely.

Let me use ctx_execute javascript for the replacements.

const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const dir = '/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts';
const files = fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(f => f.endsWith('.md') && (f.startsWith('p-') || f.startsWith('c-'))).sort();
for (const f of files) {
  const filePath = path.join(dir, f);
  const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
  const newContent = content.replace(/\$\{@:-[^}]+\}/g, '$@');
  if (newContent !== content) {
    fs.writeFileSync(filePath, newContent);
    console.log(`updated ${f}`);
  } else {
    console.log(`no change ${f}`);
  }
}


```javascript
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const dir = '/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts';
const files = fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(f => f.endsWith('.md') && (f.startsWith('p-') || f.startsWith('c-'))).sort();
for (const f of files) {
  const filePath = path.join(dir, f);
  const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
  const newContent = content.replace(/\$\{@:-[^}]+\}/g, '$@');
  if (newContent !== content) {
    fs.writeFileSync(filePath, newContent);
    console.log(`updated ${f}`);
  } else {
    console.log(`no change ${f}`);
  }
}

```

updated c-design-build.md
updated c-fix-commit.md
updated c-refactor-commit.md
updated c-security-loop.md
updated p-brainstorm.md
updated p-commit.md
updated p-debug.md
updated p-diagnose.md
updated p-doc.md
updated p-explain.md
updated p-plan.md
updated p-refactor.md
updated p-review.md
updated p-secaudit.md
updated p-summarize.md
updated p-test.md


Good. Now I need to update the c-*.md files:
1. Remove `async: true` from frontmatter (since it's ignored by pi-subagents adapter)
2. Update invocation examples to use `--bg`

I can do this with edit tool for each c- file. Or use another ctx_execute script. Let me use edit tool for precise changes.

Actually, I'll use a single ctx_execute script to do these changes too, since it's a clear bulk operation. But the user's tool instructions prefer edit for precise changes. However, ctx_execute is also acceptable for processing. Since these are simple transformations, I'll use ctx_execute for speed.

Changes for c-*.md:
- Remove line `async: true` from frontmatter
- Change `/prompt-workflow c-XXX "` to `/prompt-workflow c-XXX --bg "`

Let me verify the current state first.

const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const dir = '/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts';
const files = fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(f => f.startsWith('c-') && f.endsWith('.md')).sort();
for (const f of files) {
  const filePath = path.join(dir, f);
  let content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
  const original = content;
  // Remove async: true line from frontmatter
  content = content.replace(/^async: true\n/m, '');
  // Add --bg to invocation example: /prompt-workflow c-name "..." -> /prompt-workflow c-name --bg "..."
  const name = f.replace('.md', '');
  content = content.replace(new RegExp(`/prompt-workflow ${name} \\"`, 'g'), `/prompt-workflow ${name} --bg "`);
  if (content !== original) {
    fs.writeFileSync(filePath, content);
    console.log(`updated ${f}`);
  } else {
    console.log(`no change ${f}`);
  }
}


```javascript
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const dir = '/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts';
const files = fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(f => f.startsWith('c-') && f.endsWith('.md')).sort();
for (const f of files) {
  const filePath = path.join(dir, f);
  let content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
  const original = content;
  // Remove async: true line from frontmatter
  content = content.replace(/^async: true\n/m, '');
  // Add --bg to invocation example: /prompt-workflow c-name "..." -> /prompt-workflow c-name --bg "..."
  const name = f.replace('.md', '');
  content = content.replace(new RegExp(`/prompt-workflow ${name} \\"`, 'g'), `/prompt-workflow ${name} --bg "`);
  if (content !== original) {
    fs.writeFileSync(filePath, content);
    console.log(`updated ${f}`);
  } else {
    console.log(`no change ${f}`);
  }
}

```

updated c-design-build.md
updated c-fix-commit.md
updated c-refactor-commit.md
updated c-security-loop.md


Good. Now let me verify the final state of all files, especially c-*.md and a few p-*.md.


---
description: Brainstorm → plan → test → commit in one background chain
argument-hint: "[task or feature]"
chain: p-brainstorm -> p-plan -> p-test -> p-commit
---
Run the design → plan → test → commit chain for: $@

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg "add a rate-limiter to the API"


---
description: Summarize → diagnose → debug → test in one background chain
argument-hint: "[symptom, error, or observed behavior]"
chain: p-summarize -> p-diagnose -> p-debug -> p-test
---
Run the understand → diagnose → fix → regression-test chain for: $@

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit --bg "the checkout intermittently times out"


---
description: Refactor → test → review → commit in one background chain
argument-hint: "[file path or symbol to refactor]"
chain: p-refactor -> p-test -> p-review -> p-commit
---
Run the safe refactor → validate → review → commit chain for: $@

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit --bg "src/utils.ts"


---
description: Security audit → review → test in one background chain
argument-hint: "[file path, diff, or feature to audit]"
chain: p-secaudit -> p-review -> p-test
---
Run the security-first review loop for: $@

Invoke with:
/prompt-workflow c-security-loop --bg "auth endpoint"


Good. The c- files look correct now. Let me verify a few p- files too, and also verify there are no remaining ${@:- patterns.


---
description: Generate 3–5 design alternatives with trade-offs before committing to an approach
argument-hint: "[problem or feature to design]"
subagent: true
fork: true
---
Brainstorm approaches for: $@

Structure your answer as:
1. **Problem restatement** — one paragraph; what we're solving, what constraints matter, what "done" looks like

[12 more lines in file. Use offset=11 to continue.]


---
description: Generate a conventional commit message and optional PR description from current changes
argument-hint: "[diff, file list, or 'auto' to use git status]"
subagent: true
fork: true
---
Generate a commit message for: $@

Structure your answer as:
1. **Type & scope** — one of: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, build, ci, chore, style; scope is the affected module/subsystem

[9 more lines in file. Use offset=11 to continue.]


---
description: Write or expand unit / integration tests for the given code
argument-hint: "[file path, function, or feature to test]"
subagent: true
fork: true
---
Write tests for: $@

Structure your answer as:
1. **Existing conventions** — name patterns, framework, assertion style, fixtures; match what's already there

[10 more lines in file. Use offset=11 to continue.]


Doc/prompts.md  [untracked in git]
 72: - Every prompt uses `${@:-<default>}` so it works with or without an argument.


There's a Doc/prompts.md that documents the ${@:- pattern. I should update that too, since we've changed the implementation. Let me read that file.


# Prompts

Slash-style prompts for the interactive pi session. Each file is a `p-<verb>.md` template with a frontmatter `description` + `argument-hint` and a structured body. Invoke with `:p-<verb> [arg]` or via the `:prompts` TUI picker.

## When to use which

| Prompt             | Use it when…                                                                                | Pairs well with                                         |
| ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| **`p-plan`**       | You're about to start a non-trivial change and want a structured plan before coding.                            | `p-brainstorm` (first), then `p-refactor` / `p-test`    |
| **`p-brainstorm`** | You have a problem but no chosen approach yet; want 3–5 alternatives with trade-offs.                           | `p-plan` (after picking one)                            |
| **`p-explain`**    | You don't understand a piece of code, a concept, or an error message.                                           | `p-debug` / `p-diagnose` (if it's a problem)            |
| **`p-debug`**      | A test, build, or command is failing with a clear error. You have the error in hand.                            | `p-test` (add a regression test after the fix)          |
| **`p-diagnose`**   | Nothing is "failing" but behavior is wrong — wrong values, races, perf drift, "passes locally, broken in prod." | `p-debug` (if you find a hard failure)                  |
| **`p-review`**     | You want a code review of a diff, file, or staged change. General quality feedback.                             | `p-secaudit` (security subset)                          |
| **`p-secaudit`**   | Touching auth, input handling, secrets, network, deserialization, or any trust boundary.                        | `p-review` (broader quality), `p-test`                  |
| **`p-refactor`**   | Restructuring code without changing behavior. Safety-first, mechanical steps.                                   | `p-test` (first, as the safety net), `p-review` (after) |
| **`p-test`**       | You need to write or expand tests for existing or new code.                                                     | `p-debug` (after a failure), `p-refactor` (before)      |
| **`p-doc`**        | Writing or improving README, docstrings, JSDoc, godoc, or ADRs.                                                 | `p-summarize` (skim the code first)                     |
| **`p-commit`**     | About to commit. You want a conventional message and (optionally) a PR description.                             | `p-review` (final check before committing)              |
| **`p-summarize`**  | A file, log, diff, or document is too long to read in full. You need the gist + key details.                    | `p-plan` / `p-debug` (then dive into specifics)         |

## Decision flow

```
Got an idea or vague problem?
└─ Yes → p-brainstorm  →  pick an approach  →  p-plan  →  implement
                                                          └─ p-test  →  p-commit
Touching existing code that needs to change?
└─ p-refactor (after p-test confirms a safety net)  →  p-review  →  p-commit
Something is broken?
├─ Hard failure (error message, failing test)  →  p-debug
└─ Soft failure (wrong output, race, perf)      →  p-diagnose
                                       →  fix  →  p-test (regression)  →  p-commit
Touching a trust boundary, auth, secrets, or untrusted input?
└─ p-secaudit  (then p-review for general quality)
Need to understand a long file/log/diff quickly?
└─ p-summarize
Need to write or update docs?
└─ p-doc
Don't know what something does or what an error means?
└─ p-explain
```

## Chain recipes

The `c-*` files are not prompts you run directly in the editor. They are orchestration recipes that run a sequence of `p-*` prompts through the `pi-subagents` prompt-workflow adapter. Each `p-*` step is executed as a forked-context subagent, so later steps can see earlier outputs. Chains run asynchronously by default.

| Recipe             | Sequence                                  | Use it when…                                                               |
| ------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **`c-design-build`** | `p-brainstorm → p-plan → p-test → p-commit` | You want to design a feature, plan it, add tests, and commit in one go.    |
| **`c-fix-commit`** | `p-summarize → p-diagnose → p-debug → p-test` | You need to understand a bug, diagnose it, fix it, and add regression tests. |
| **`c-refactor-commit`** | `p-refactor → p-test → p-review → p-commit` | You want a safe refactor with tests, review, and a commit.                  |
| **`c-security-loop`** | `p-secaudit → p-review → p-test`           | You need a security-first review plus tests before proceeding.             |

Invoke a chain with `/prompt-workflow`, not `/c-recipe`:

```text
/prompt-workflow c-design-build "add a rate-limiter to the API"
/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit "the checkout intermittently times out"
/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit "src/utils.ts"
/prompt-workflow c-security-loop "auth endpoint"
```

Each chain runs in the background. Watch it with `/subagents-fleet` or check status with `subagent({ action: "status" })`. If you want to run the same sequence ad-hoc, use `/chain-prompts`:

```text
/chain-prompts p-brainstorm -> p-plan -> p-test -> p-commit -- "add a rate-limiter"
```

## Conventions

- Every prompt uses `${@:-<default>}` so it works with or without an argument.
- Output is structured (numbered sections, fixed categories) so the result is diff-friendly and skim-friendly.
- Prompts intentionally do **not** overlap with subagent workflows (`agents/`, `chains/`, `skills/`) — those are for orchestration; these are for interactive turns.
- Prefer one prompt per turn. Chain them yourself (`p-brainstorm` → `p-plan` → `p-refactor`) rather than asking one prompt to do everything.


I need to update the Doc/prompts.md file:
1. Change the line "Every prompt uses `${@:-<default>}` so it works with or without an argument." to reflect that we now use `$@` and prompts need an argument (or the user should provide one)
2. Update the invocation examples to use `--bg`

Actually, since we changed to `$@`, the prompts no longer have a default fallback. So the documentation should say that prompts use `$@` and expect an argument. But I could also add a fallback? The issue is that pi-subagents doesn't support `${@:-...}`. It only supports `$@`. So if no argument is provided, it will be empty. The prompt should ask clarifying questions when under-specified, which many already do.

Let me update the doc:
- Change the conventions bullet
- Add --bg to the examples

Let me use edit tool for this.

edit

/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg "add a rate-limiter to the API"
/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit --bg "the checkout intermittently times out"
/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit --bg "src/utils.ts"
/prompt-workflow c-security-loop --bg "auth endpoint"

/prompt-workflow c-design-build "add a rate-limiter to the API"
/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit "the checkout intermittently times out"
/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit "src/utils.ts"
/prompt-workflow c-security-loop "auth endpoint"

- Every prompt uses `$@` for the user-supplied argument. Pass an argument at invocation time; if the request is under-specified, the prompt will ask clarifying questions.

- Every prompt uses `${@:-<default>}` so it works with or without an argument.


Successfully replaced 2 block(s) in /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/Doc/prompts.md.

    ...
 54
 55 Invoke a chain with `/prompt-workflow`, not `/c-recipe`:
 56
 57 ```text
-58 /prompt-workflow c-design-build "add a rate-limiter to the API"
-59 /prompt-workflow c-fix-commit "the checkout intermittently times out"
-60 /prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit "src/utils.ts"
-61 /prompt-workflow c-security-loop "auth endpoint"
+58 /prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg "add a rate-limiter to the API"
+59 /prompt-workflow c-fix-commit --bg "the checkout intermittently times out"
+60 /prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit --bg "src/utils.ts"
+61 /prompt-workflow c-security-loop --bg "auth endpoint"
 62 ```
 63
 64 Each chain runs in the background. Watch it with `/subagents-fleet` or check status with `subagent({ action: "status" })`. If you want to run the same sequence ad-hoc, use `/chain-prompts`:
 65
    ...
 68 ```
 69
 70 ## Conventions
 71
-72 - Every prompt uses `${@:-<default>}` so it works with or without an argument.
+72 - Every prompt uses `$@` for the user-supplied argument. Pass an argument at invocation time; if the request is under-specified, the prompt will ask clarifying questions.
 73 - Output is structured (numbered sections, fixed categories) so the result is diff-friendly and skim-friendly.
 74 - Prompts intentionally do **not** overlap with subagent workflows (`agents/`, `chains/`, `skills/`) — those are for orchestration; these are for interactive turns.
 75 - Prefer one prompt per turn. Chain them yourself (`p-brainstorm` → `p-plan` → `p-refactor`) rather than asking one prompt to do everything.

--- /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/Doc/prompts.md
+++ /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/Doc/prompts.md
@@ -54,12 +54,12 @@

 Invoke a chain with `/prompt-workflow`, not `/c-recipe`:

 ```text
-/prompt-workflow c-design-build "add a rate-limiter to the API"
-/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit "the checkout intermittently times out"
-/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit "src/utils.ts"
-/prompt-workflow c-security-loop "auth endpoint"
+/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg "add a rate-limiter to the API"
+/prompt-workflow c-fix-commit --bg "the checkout intermittently times out"
+/prompt-workflow c-refactor-commit --bg "src/utils.ts"
+/prompt-workflow c-security-loop --bg "auth endpoint"
 ```

 Each chain runs in the background. Watch it with `/subagents-fleet` or check status with `subagent({ action: "status" })`. If you want to run the same sequence ad-hoc, use `/chain-prompts`:

@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@
 ```

 ## Conventions

-- Every prompt uses `${@:-<default>}` so it works with or without an argument.
+- Every prompt uses `$@` for the user-supplied argument. Pass an argument at invocation time; if the request is under-specified, the prompt will ask clarifying questions.
 - Output is structured (numbered sections, fixed categories) so the result is diff-friendly and skim-friendly.
 - Prompts intentionally do **not** overlap with subagent workflows (`agents/`, `chains/`, `skills/`) — those are for orchestration; these are for interactive turns.
 - Prefer one prompt per turn. Chain them yourself (`p-brainstorm` → `p-plan` → `p-refactor`) rather than asking one prompt to do everything.


Good. Now I need to run a test to verify the c- prompts work. I should invoke one of them through pi. But how do I test this? The pi CLI is the interface. I can run pi in a non-interactive mode, but the prompt workflow is a slash command inside pi's TUI.

Actually, pi supports running commands in print mode with `-p` flag. Let me check the pi docs. Or I can use the pi-subagents native adapter by running a subagent chain directly. But the user wants to test the c- prompt workflow.

The best way to test is to actually run pi with the prompt workflow command. In print mode: `pi -p "/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg test task"` maybe? But slash commands might not be available in print mode. Let me check.

Actually, slash commands are registered by extensions and work in the interactive TUI. In print mode, they might not work the same way. Let me check the pi usage docs or just try.

Alternatively, I can inspect the pi-subagents extension code and test the parsing logic directly. But a real end-to-end test is better.

Let me try running pi in a way that executes the slash command. Maybe `pi -p "..."` or `pi --print "..."`. Let me check the docs for CLI usage.

Actually, looking at the extensions.md, `pi.registerCommand` registers slash commands. These are TUI/RPC commands. In print mode, they might not be parsed.

Let me try `pi --help` first to see available options.


pi - AI coding assistant with read, bash, edit, write tools

Usage:
  pi [options] [@files...] [messages...]

Commands:
  pi install <source> [-l]     Install extension source and add to settings
  pi remove <source> [-l]      Remove extension source from settings
  pi uninstall <source> [-l]   Alias for remove
  pi update [source|self|pi]   Update pi, extensions, or model catalogs
  pi list                      List installed extensions from settings
  pi config [-l]               Open TUI to enable/disable package resources (Tab switches scope)
  pi <command> --help          Show help for install/remove/uninstall/update/list/config

Options:
  --provider <name>              Provider name (default: google)
  --model <pattern>              Model pattern or ID (supports "provider/id" and optional ":<thinking>")
  --api-key <key>                API key (defaults to env vars)
  --system-prompt <text>         System prompt (default: coding assistant prompt)
  --append-system-prompt <text>  Append text or file contents to the system prompt (can be used multiple times)
  --mode <mode>                  Output mode: text (default), json, or rpc
  --print, -p                    Non-interactive mode: process prompt and exit
  --continue, -c                 Continue previous session
  --resume, -r                   Select a session to resume
  --session <path|id>            Use specific session file or partial UUID
  --session-id <id>              Use exact project session ID, creating it if missing
  --fork <path|id>               Fork specific session file or partial UUID into a new session
  --session-dir <dir>            Directory for session storage and lookup
  --no-session                   Don't save session (ephemeral)
  --name, -n <name>              Set session display name
  --models <patterns>            Comma-separated model patterns for Ctrl+P cycling
                                 Supports globs (anthropic/*, *sonnet*) and fuzzy matching
  --no-tools, -nt                Disable all tools by default (built-in and extension)
  --no-builtin-tools, -nbt       Disable built-in tools by default but keep extension/custom tools enabled
  --tools, -t <tools>            Comma-separated allowlist of tool names to enable
                                 Applies to built-in, extension, and custom tools
  --exclude-tools, -xt <tools>   Comma-separated denylist of tool names to disable
                                 Applies to built-in, extension, and custom tools
  --thinking <level>             Set thinking level: off, minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, max
  --extension, -e <path>         Load an extension file (can be used multiple times)
  --no-extensions, -ne           Disable extension discovery (explicit -e paths still work)
  --skill <path>                 Load a skill file or directory (can be used multiple times)
  --no-skills, -ns               Disable skills discovery and loading
  --prompt-template <path>       Load a prompt template file or directory (can be used multiple times)
  --no-prompt-templates, -np     Disable prompt template discovery and loading
  --theme <path>                 Load a theme file or directory (can be used multiple times)
  --no-themes                    Disable theme discovery and loading
  --no-context-files, -nc        Disable AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md discovery and loading
  --export <file>                Export session file to HTML and exit
  --list-models [search]         List available models (with optional fuzzy search)
  --verbose                      Force verbose startup (overrides quietStartup setting)
  --approve, -a                  Trust project-local files for this run
  --no-approve, -na              Ignore project-local files for this run
  --offline                      Disable startup network operations (same as PI_OFFLINE=1)
  --help, -h                     Show this help
  --version, -v                  Show version number

Extensions can register additional flags (e.g., --plan from plan-mode extension).
Extension CLI Flags:
  --fff-mode <value>          FFF mode: tools-and-ui | tools-only | override
  --fff-frecency-db <value>   Path to the frecency database (overrides FFF_FRECENCY_DB env)
  --fff-history-db <value>    Path to the query history database (overrides FFF_HISTORY_DB env)
  --fff-enable-root-scan      Allow indexing when launched from the filesystem root (also: FFF_ENABLE_ROOT_SCAN env)

Examples:
  # Interactive mode
  pi

  # Interactive mode with initial prompt
  pi "List all .ts files in src/"

  # Include files in initial message
  pi @prompt.md @image.png "What color is the sky?"

  # Non-interactive mode (process and exit)
  pi -p "List all .ts files in src/"

  # Multiple messages (interactive)
  pi "Read package.json" "What dependencies do we have?"


I can run `pi -p "..."` in non-interactive mode. But will it process slash commands? Slash commands are normally typed in the TUI. In print mode, the input is a prompt. Let me check if pi recognizes slash commands in print mode.

Looking at the extensions.md lifecycle: "user sends prompt → extension commands checked first". So yes, slash commands are checked before agent processing. So `pi -p "/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg test"` should work if the extension is loaded.

However, the prompt workflow runs a subagent chain. In print mode, this might not work well because subagents need interactive context. But pi-subagents supports async mode. If I use --bg, it will launch a background run. In print mode, the process might exit before the background run completes. That's actually fine for testing that it starts.

Let me try running it. But first I need to decide which c- prompt to test. c-design-build has 4 steps and would take a while. c-security-loop has 3 steps. Maybe c-refactor-commit is simpler? Actually, all are similar.

Better: I can test the parsing without running a full chain by using a command that lists workflows: `/prompt-workflow list`. But that doesn't test the chain.

Alternatively, I can run a quick test by invoking `pi -p "/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg 'test argument passing'"` and see if it starts the background chain and passes the argument correctly. But this will actually run 4 subagents and could take a while and cost tokens.

Since the user asked to test if the c- prompts work, I should run at least one. Let me run c-security-loop with a simple argument to keep it shorter. Or maybe run c-design-build as it's the canonical example.

Actually, maybe I can test the argument substitution without running the full chain by inspecting what the workflow adapter would generate. But end-to-end is better.

Let me run `pi -p "/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg 'test the prompt workflow chain'"` from the current directory. This will start a background chain. The process will likely exit quickly because it's async. Then I can check the artifacts to see if the argument was passed correctly.

Wait, but the current working directory is `/home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts`. That's fine because the prompt files are there. But the actual work would happen in this directory (or the cwd). The c-design-build chain runs p-brainstorm, p-plan, p-test, p-commit. These are prompts, not actual code changes. They will try to work on the current directory, which is the prompts directory itself.

The test argument "test the prompt workflow chain" would be passed to p-brainstorm, which would brainstorm approaches for "test the prompt workflow chain". That's meta but fine.

Let me run it. I should set a timeout because it might take a while.

bash

cd /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts && pi -p "/prompt-workflow c-design-build --bg 'test the prompt workflow chain'" 2>&1 | head -50


(no output)


No output. Maybe pi -p doesn't output anything for slash commands, or it ran but the command wasn't recognized. Let me check if there are new artifacts or a new chain run.

ls -lt /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/.pi-subagents/chain-runs | head -10; ls -lt /home/liph/dotfiles/pi/.pi/agent/prompts/.pi-subagents/artifacts | head -20


total 12
drwxr-xr-x 2 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 17:45 5f390df5
drwxr-xr-x 2 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 17:44 68d5d3d2
drwxr-xr-x 2 liph liph 4096 Jul 24 17:42 f23fc33e
total 664
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   5751 Jul 24 17:56 bf21079c-ea77-4354-9a04-02af537c6b1f_delegate_0_transcript.jsonl
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   2589 Jul 24 17:56 bf21079c-ea77-4354-9a04-02af537c6b1f_delegate_0_input.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  12498 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_3_meta.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   3805 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_3_output.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 284130 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_3_transcript.jsonl
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   6578 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_3_input.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  15071 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_2_meta.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   4057 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_2_output.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  77373 Jul 24 17:47 5f390df5_delegate_2_transcript.jsonl
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   8762 Jul 24 17:46 5f390df5_delegate_2_input.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  10126 Jul 24 17:46 5f390df5_delegate_1_meta.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   6030 Jul 24 17:46 5f390df5_delegate_1_output.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  61501 Jul 24 17:46 5f390df5_delegate_1_transcript.jsonl
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   7081 Jul 24 17:45 5f390df5_delegate_1_input.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   5066 Jul 24 17:45 5f390df5_delegate_0_meta.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   4898 Jul 24 17:45 5f390df5_delegate_0_output.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  39281 Jul 24 17:45 5f390df5_delegate_0_transcript.jsonl
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   2595 Jul 24 17:45 5f390df5_delegate_0_input.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph   4445 Jul 24 17:44 68d5d3d2_delegate_0_meta.json


There's a new artifact `bf21079c-ea77-4354-9a04-02af537c6b1f_delegate_0_input.md` and transcript. It seems only one delegate was launched, not a chain. Let me check this artifact.


# Task for delegate

Brainstorm approaches for: test the prompt workflow chain

Structure your answer as:
1. **Problem restatement** — one paragraph; what we're solving, what constraints matter, what "done" looks like
2. **Alternatives** — 3 to 5 distinct approaches. For each:
   - **Summary** — one or two sentences
   - **How it works** — the key mechanism
   - **Pros** — what it gets right
   - **Cons** — what it costs, risks, or breaks
   - **Best when** — the conditions that would make this the right pick
3. **Comparison table** — across the alternatives, score or rank on: complexity, time-to-ship, reversibility, performance, fit-with-existing-code
4. **Recommendation** — which one to pick *given the current codebase*, with the second choice as a fallback
5. **Unknowns** — questions that, if answered, would change the recommendation

Be opinionated. Surface real trade-offs, not strawmen. If the obvious approach wins decisively, say so and only enumerate 2 alternatives — don't manufacture options for the sake of a full set. If the problem is under-specified, ask clarifying questions before brainstorming.

## Acceptance Contract
Acceptance level: attested
Completion is not accepted from prose alone. End with a structured acceptance report.

Criteria:
- criterion-1: Return a concise result and residual risks when applicable

Required evidence: manual-notes, residual-risks

Finish with a fenced JSON block tagged `acceptance-report` in this shape:
Use empty arrays when no items apply; array fields contain strings unless object entries are shown.
`criteriaSatisfied[].status` must be exactly one of: satisfied, not-satisfied, not-applicable.
`commandsRun[].result` must be exactly one of: passed, failed, not-run.
`manualNotes` and `notes` are optional strings; an empty string means no note and does not satisfy `manual-notes` evidence.
```acceptance-report
{
  "criteriaSatisfied": [
    {
      "id": "criterion-1",
      "status": "satisfied",
      "evidence": "specific proof"
    }
  ],
  "changedFiles": [
    "src/file.ts"
  ],
  "testsAddedOrUpdated": [
    "test/file.test.ts"
  ],
  "commandsRun": [
    {
      "command": "command",
      "result": "passed",
      "summary": "short result"
    }
  ],
  "validationOutput": [
    "validation output or concise summary"
  ],
  "residualRisks": [
    "none"
  ],
  "noStagedFiles": true,
  "diffSummary": "short description of the diff",
  "reviewFindings": [
    "blocker: file.ts:12 - issue found, or no blockers"
  ],
  "manualNotes": "anything else the parent should know"
}
```