type: message

role: user

type: text

text:
<skill name="orchestration" location="/home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/pi-crew/skills/orchestration/SKILL.md">
References are relative to /home/liph/.pi/agent/npm/node_modules/pi-crew/skills/orchestration.

# orchestration

Use this skill when orchestrating multi-phase tasks across pi-crew teams and workers.

## Role definition

You are the orchestrator — the coordinator, not the executor.

You decompose, dispatch, verify, and iterate. You do NOT edit code directly. If you find yourself opening a file to fix a typo "real quick," stop — spawn a worker instead.

## Rules (8 orchestration rules)

Adapted from oh-my-pi's orchestrate command pattern for pi-crew context.

### 1. Do not yield until everything is closed

Do not yield control while work remains unfinished. Run every phase to completion. The orchestrator owns the full lifecycle — from first dispatch to final green gate.

### 2. Enumerate the full surface before dispatching

Before writing any task packet, read every referenced file and understand the complete work surface. Enumerate the entire surface before assigning work — do not assign work before you fully understand the scope.

### 3. Parallelize maximally

Every set of edits with disjoint file scope MUST ship as one batch. If 5 tasks edit 5 different files and are independent of one another, dispatch all of them at once. Never serialize what can be parallelized.

### 4. Each task assignment is self-contained

Subagents have no shared context. Each worker only knows what you write in the task packet. Include all necessary context, file paths, constraints, and acceptance criteria in every task.

### 5. Verify after every phase before launching the next

Run appropriate gates between phases: typecheck, tests, lint. Do not skip verification — a red phase must not advance to the next phase.

### 6. Commit policy — green only

Commit after each green phase. Never commit a red tree. Only commit when all gates pass. If the phase fails, fix it first.

### 7. Respawn, do not absorb

If a subagent returns incomplete or broken work, spawn a corrective subagent with a focused fix-up task packet. Do not fix a worker's mistakes yourself — respawn a new worker to fix them.

### 8. No scope creep, no scope shrink

Maintain the original scope exactly. Do not expand scope because you "spot more work," and do not shrink it because "it's good enough for now." If scope needs to change, escalate to the requester.

## Workflow (7 steps)

### Step 1 — Ingest

- Read every referenced file in the goal/task description.
- Run `git status` and `git diff` to understand current tree state.
- Identify all files, symbols, and subsystems in scope.
- Check workspace tree for project context and existing patterns.

### Step 2 — Plan

- Materialize the full work surface as ordered phases.
- For each phase, enumerate: files to touch, workers needed, dependencies on other phases.
- Phases must be ordered by dependency; tasks within a phase must be independent (disjoint file scope).
- Write the plan down — do not keep the plan in your head.

### Step 3 — Dispatch phase

- Launch all parallel subagents in one `team` call.
- Each subagent receives a complete task packet (see `requirements-to-task-packet` skill).
- Set explicit file ownership per worker — no two workers touch the same file.
- Use `workspaceMode: 'worktree'` when parallel edits risk conflict.

### Step 4 — Verify phase

- Run verification gates: typecheck, tests, lint as appropriate.
- If green → proceed to commit.
- If red → dispatch fix-up subagents with precise failure context (error output, file, line). Do NOT fix it yourself.

### Step 5 — Commit phase (if applicable)

- Only when all gates are green.
- Commit message should reference the phase and what was accomplished.
- Never commit a red tree.

### Step 6 — Advance

- Mark current phase done.
- Immediately start the next phase — do not pause to ask "ready to continue?"
- Loop back to Step 3 for the next phase.

### Step 7 — Final verification

- Run the full gate set one more time after all phases complete.
- This is the final safety net — typecheck, tests, lint, everything.
- Only report DONE when final verification is green.

## Enforcement — Orchestration Gate

**Before launching a new phase, verify:**

- [ ] Full work surface enumerated (all files, symbols, subsystems known)
- [ ] Phase tasks are independent (disjoint file scope, no edit conflicts)
- [ ] Each worker has explicit file ownership (no two workers same file)
- [ ] Verification gates defined for phase completion
- [ ] Phase gate passed (typecheck, tests, lint green) before advancing
- [ ] Respawn workers for broken work (do not absorb/fix yourself)

If ANY answer is NO → Stop. Complete planning before dispatching.

## Anti-patterns

These are the behaviours that kill orchestration quality — avoid them:

| Anti-pattern | Why it's wrong |
|---|---|
| Editing files yourself "because it's faster" | You are the orchestrator, not an editor. Speed comes from correct delegation, not shortcutting. |
| Yielding after phase 1 with "ready to continue?" | The requester gave you a goal, not a conversation. Drive to completion. |
| Dispatching one subagent at a time when five could run in parallel | Wasted time. Enumerate first, then batch-dispatch all independent tasks. |
| Skipping typecheck/tests between phases | A red phase propagates errors forward. Always verify before advancing. |
| Marking todos done without verifying | Unverified work is undone work. Run the gate, check the output, then mark done. |

## pi-crew specific adaptations

### Task delegation pattern

Use the `team` tool with appropriate action for dispatching work:

- `action: 'run'` with a named team for multi-role work (implementation, review, research).
- Assign one worker per file/symbol to avoid edit conflicts.
- Each task packet must be fully self-contained — workers cannot see each other's context.

### Mailbox coordination

- Use mailbox (`inbox`/`outbox`) for cross-worker coordination when workers need to signal completion or report blockers.
- Orchestrator checks mailbox after each phase to collect worker results.
- Workers report one of: DONE, DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, BLOCKED, NEEDS_CONTEXT.

### Team/workflow/role concepts

| Concept | When to use |
|---|---|
| `team: 'implementation'` | Complex multi-phase implementation with parallel specialists |
| `team: 'fast-fix'` | Small targeted fixes, single-phase |
| `team: 'review'` | Code review and security review phases |
| `team: 'research'` | Investigation before implementation planning |
| `team: 'parallel-research'` | Multi-project/source audits |
| `workflow: 'implementation'` | Adaptive fanout where planner decides subagent allocation |

### Workspace tree context

- Read `AGENTS.md` and project-level config before planning phases.
- Different subprojects have different build/test commands — use the right ones.
- pi-mono: `npm run check` (requires prior build), `./test.sh`
- pi-crew: `npm test`, `npm run typecheck`
- pi-subagents: `npm test`, `npm run test:all`

## Verification

For orchestration skill itself:

```bash
cd pi-crew
npx tsc --noEmit
node --experimental-strip-types --test test/unit/team-recommendation.test.ts
npm test
```

For orchestrated work: run the gate commands appropriate to the target subproject after each phase, and again after final phase.
</skill>

can you change the colorscheme. i especially wnat the colors for the unread emails to change. change it so it still fits into the rose-pine-moon colorscheme


role: assistant

type: thinking

thinking:
The user wants to change the aerc colorscheme, especially for unread emails, while keeping it within the rose-pine-moon colorscheme. This is an implementation task that likely involves editing a small number of config files (probably the aerc stylesets/colorscheme file). According to the delegation policy, if it's 1-2 files, I should do it directly. But the orchestration skill has been loaded and says "Use this skill when orchestrating multi-phase tasks across pi-crew teams and workers." However, the task is simple - read the current colorscheme and modify it. The delegation table says for Read/edit 1-2 files, simple question: NO - Do it directly.

But I should still read the files first to understand the current setup. Let me use context-mode tools for reading files. I need to find the aerc config files, specifically the styles/colorscheme.

The project is at /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc. Let me explore the structure.

thinkingSignature: reasoning

text: I’ll look at the aerc config files to find the current colorscheme and styles, then adjust unread-email colors while staying within rose-pine-moon.

type: toolCall

fffind

pattern: *rose*

pattern: *style*

api: openai-completions

provider: ollama

stopReason: toolUse


role: toolResult

text:
```shell
ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/
```

total 84
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph   288 May 15 20:20 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph     8 Feb  4 21:25 ..
-rw------- 1 liph liph  1083 Mar 21 08:40 accounts.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 25946 May 15 20:20 aerc.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 25790 Mar 21 09:02 aerc.conf.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  1979 Mar 23 18:57 AGENTS.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  3450 Mar 23 18:57 binds.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  3080 Mar 21 09:02 binds.conf.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  1826 Mar 23 13:15 notmuch-queries.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  2389 Mar 23 13:14 phil.queries
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph  1592 Mar 21 09:02 phil.queries.bak
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph    80 Feb  4 21:25 sigs
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph    42 Feb 23 13:14 stylesets
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph    38 Feb  4 21:25 templates
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph    18 Feb  4 21:25 themes


toolName: fffind

text:
stylesets/rose-pine
themes/rose-pine

[Query "*rose*" produced only weak scattered fuzzy matches. Output capped at 2/2.]


text:
stylesets/gruvbox-dark
stylesets/rose-pine

[Query "*style*" produced only weak scattered fuzzy matches. Output capped at 2/2.]


thinking: I see a `stylesets/rose-pine` directory and `themes/rose-pine`. The user mentioned "rose-pine-moon" specifically. Let me read both the styleset and theme files. Also, I should check what the current aerc.conf references for styleset.

ffgrep

pattern: styleset|theme


toolName: read

text:
# vim: filetype=dosini

# Rosé Pine Theme for Aerc
# All natural pine, faux fur and a bit of soho vibes for the classy minimalist
# Save as ~/.config/aerc/stylesets/rose-pine

# Base styling
default.fg=#9ccfd8
default.bg=#191724

success.fg=#31748f
error.fg=#eb6f92
warning.fg=#f6c177

title.bg=#26233a
title.fg=#c4a7e7

header.fg=#c4a7e7

spinner.fg=#6e6a86

part_filename.fg=#f6c177
part_mimetype.fg=#c4a7e7

# Global selection
*.selected.fg=#191724
*.selected.bg=#ebbcba
*.selected.bold=true

# Message list
msglist_default.fg=#9ccfd8
msglist_default.bg=#1f1d2e
msglist_unread.fg=#524f67
msglist_unread.bold=true
msglist_read.fg=#6e6a86
msglist_flagged.fg=#f6c177
msglist_flagged.bold=true
msglist_deleted.bg=#eb6f92
msglist_deleted.fg=#191724
msglist_deleted.bold=true
msglist_marked.fg=#191724
msglist_marked.bg=#31748f
msglist_marked.bold=true

# Status bar
statusline_*.bold=true
statusline_*.fg=#191724
statusline_default.fg=#9ccfd8
statusline_default.bg=#191724
statusline_error.bg=#eb6f92
statusline_success.bg=#31748f

# Completion
completion_default.fg=#9ccfd8
completion_default.bg=#1f1d2e
completion_gutter.bg=#26233a
completion_description.bg=#26233a

# Scrollbars
*_pill.fg=#191724
*_pill.bg=#6e6a86

# Border
border.fg=#191724
border.bg=#191724

# Tab
tab.bg=#191724
tab.selected.fg=#ebbcba
tab.selected.bg=#191724
tab.selected.bold=true

[viewer]
url.fg=#c4a7e7
url.underline=true
header.bold=true
signature.dim=true
diff_meta.bold=true
diff_chunk.fg=#c4a7e7
diff_chunk_func.fg=#c4a7e7
diff_chunk_func.bold=true
diff_add.fg=#524f67
diff_del.fg=#eb6f92
quote_*.fg=#908caa
quote_1.fg=#21202e


toolName: ffgrep

text:
aerc.conf
 96: styleset-name="rose-pine"
 296: # The directories where the stylesets are stored. It takes a colon-separated
 297: # list of directories. If this is unset or if a styleset cannot be found, the
 300: #   ${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-~/.config}/aerc/stylesets
 301: #   ${XDG_DATA_HOME:-~/.local/share}/aerc/stylesets
 302: #   /usr/local/share/aerc/stylesets
 303: #   /usr/share/aerc/stylesets
 305: #stylesets-dirs=
 313: # Sets the styleset to use for the aerc ui elements.
 316: #styleset-name=default
 413: # styled separately using "msglist_thread_context" in a styleset. This feature


thinking:
I see the issue. The current styleset uses colors from the Rosé Pine main variant (rose-pine), but the user wants it to be rose-pine-moon. The unread color is currently `#524f67` which is a muted gray-purple that doesn't stand out much.

Wait, looking at the file, both `stylesets/rose-pine` and `themes/rose-pine` have identical content. There's only one variant currently. The user wants rose-pine-moon colorscheme.

Rosé Pine Moon palette:
- base: #232136
- surface: #2a273f
- overlay: #393552
- muted: #6e6a86
- subtle: #908caa
- text: #e0def4
- love: #eb6f92
- gold: #f6c177
- rose: #ea9a97
- pine: #3e8fb0
- foam: #9ccfd8
- iris: #c4a7e7
- highlight low: #2a283e
- highlight med: #44415a
- highlight high: #56526e

The user especially wants unread emails to change. Currently in rose-pine:
- msglist_unread.fg=#524f67 (very muted, almost invisible)
- msglist_unread.bold=true

For rose-pine-moon, we should change the base bg to #232136, and other elements accordingly. The unread color should be a prominent color from the moon palette. Looking at the existing structure, I should either:
1. Rename the file to rose-pine-moon and update aerc.conf
2. Create a new file rose-pine-moon and update aerc.conf
3. Modify the existing rose-pine to be moon colors

The user said "change it so it still fits into the rose-pine-moon colorscheme". This suggests they want it to be rose-pine-moon, not the current rose-pine. So probably best to create a new styleset file `rose-pine-moon` and update aerc.conf to reference it.

Since themes/rose-pine exists too, I should check what the themes directory is for. In aerc, themes are used for syntax highlighting in the message viewer? Actually aerc has stylesets for UI colors. The themes directory might be for templates/theming. Let me check the aerc docs conventions. Actually I see both stylesets and themes have the same file. The themes directory in aerc is typically for `*color` schemes for syntax highlighting? Hmm, not sure. But the user only mentions changing colorscheme in aerc context. The important file is stylesets since aerc.conf references it.

I need to decide: Should I modify existing or create new? Creating new is cleaner. The user wants rose-pine-moon specifically. I'll create a new file `stylesets/rose-pine-moon` with the moon palette, update `aerc.conf` to use it. The `themes/rose-pine` may be for something else, let me see if it's referenced anywhere.

pattern: theme|themes

fffind

pattern: themes/*

bash

command: ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/themes/ && ls -la /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/stylesets/


text: No matches found


text:
themes/rose-pine

[Query "themes/*" produced only weak scattered fuzzy matches. Output capped at 1/1.]


toolName: bash

text:
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph   18 Feb  4 21:25 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph  288 May 15 20:20 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 1609 Feb  4 21:25 rose-pine
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph   42 Feb 23 13:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 liph liph  288 May 15 20:20 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 1125 Mar 21 10:53 gruvbox-dark
-rw-r--r-- 1 liph liph 1609 Feb  4 21:25 rose-pine


thinking:
The themes/rose-pine file is not referenced in aerc.conf. It might be legacy. The styleset is the active one. I should focus on creating `stylesets/rose-pine-moon` and updating `aerc.conf` to use it.

The task is simple: 2 files (create new styleset, update aerc.conf). Direct implementation is appropriate. No need to delegate.

But I should be careful - the orchestration skill says "Do NOT edit code directly. If you find yourself opening a file to fix a typo 'real quick,' stop — spawn a worker instead." However, this conflicts with the general delegation policy for simple tasks. The user explicitly loaded the orchestration skill, but the task is small and fits the "Read/edit 1-2 files" no-delegate case. Also the orchestration skill says "Use this skill when orchestrating multi-phase tasks across pi-crew teams and workers" - this is not a multi-phase task, it's a simple config change. I'll do it directly.

Now I need to design the rose-pine-moon styleset. Let me map the colors:

Rosé Pine Moon palette:
- base: #232136
- surface: #2a273f
- overlay: #393552
- muted: #6e6a86
- subtle: #908caa
- text: #e0def4
- love: #eb6f92
- gold: #f6c177
- rose: #ea9a97
- pine: #3e8fb0
- foam: #9ccfd8
- iris: #c4a7e7
- highlight low: #2a283e
- highlight med: #44415a
- highlight high: #56526e

Current rose-pine mapping:
- default.fg=#9ccfd8 (foam) -> moon foam #9ccfd8 (same)
- default.bg=#191724 (base) -> moon base #232136
- success.fg=#31748f (pine) -> moon pine #3e8fb0
- error.fg=#eb6f92 (love) -> same
- warning.fg=#f6c177 (gold) -> same
- title.bg=#26233a (surface) -> moon surface #2a273f
- title.fg=#c4a7e7 (iris) -> same
- header.fg=#c4a7e7 -> same
- spinner.fg=#6e6a86 (muted) -> same
- part_filename.fg=#f6c177 -> same
- part_mimetype.fg=#c4a7e7 -> same
- *.selected.fg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- *.selected.bg=#ebbcba (rose) -> moon rose #ea9a97
- msglist_default.fg=#9ccfd8 -> same
- msglist_default.bg=#1f1d2e (surface?) -> moon surface #2a273f or base? In moon, surface is #2a273f
- msglist_unread.fg=#524f67 -> this is highlight-med in rose-pine. In moon it should be more visible. The user wants unread to stand out more. I could use #e0def4 (text) or #ea9a97 (rose) or #f6c177 (gold). But the convention in the current file is to use a muted color for unread? Wait, actually in many email clients, unread is bold and brighter. Currently it's #524f67 which is very dark/muted. Let me change it to #e0def4 (text) which is the main text color, making unread emails bright and obvious. Or maybe #ea9a97 (rose) for accent. Actually looking at rose-pine-moon aesthetics, using text #e0def4 for unread would make them pop against the #2a273f background. That seems good.
- msglist_read.fg=#6e6a86 -> muted, same in moon
- msglist_flagged.fg=#f6c177 -> same
- msglist_deleted.bg=#eb6f92 -> same
- msglist_deleted.fg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- msglist_marked.fg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- msglist_marked.bg=#31748f -> moon pine #3e8fb0
- statusline_default.fg=#9ccfd8 -> same
- statusline_default.bg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- statusline_error.bg=#eb6f92 -> same
- statusline_success.bg=#31748f -> moon pine #3e8fb0
- completion_default.fg=#9ccfd8 -> same
- completion_default.bg=#1f1d2e -> moon surface #2a273f
- completion_gutter.bg=#26233a -> moon surface #2a273f
- completion_description.bg=#26233a -> moon surface #2a273f
- *_pill.fg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- *_pill.bg=#6e6a86 -> same
- border.fg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- border.bg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- tab.bg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- tab.selected.fg=#ebbcba -> moon rose #ea9a97
- tab.selected.bg=#191724 -> moon base #232136
- viewer url.fg=#c4a7e7 -> same
- diff_chunk.fg=#c4a7e7 -> same
- diff_chunk_func.fg=#c4a7e7 -> same
- diff_add.fg=#524f67 -> moon text? Actually diff_add should be visible. In rose-pine it's #524f67 (dark). In moon, maybe #9ccfd8 or #3e8fb0. But diff_add is for added lines in diffs, should be green-ish. There's no green in rose-pine-moon. The closest is pine #3e8fb0 or foam #9ccfd8. But the original used a dark color, maybe indicating subtle. Let me keep it as moon highlight-med #44415a or use #908caa (subtle).
- diff_del.fg=#eb6f92 -> same
- quote_*.fg=#908caa (subtle) -> moon subtle #908caa same
- quote_1.fg=#21202e -> this is highlight-low in rose-pine. In moon it's #2a283e.

I'll also add `msglist_unread.bg` maybe? Currently only fg is set. We could set bg to moon highlight-low #2a283e to make it stand out even more? But that might be too much. Let's keep simple: change unread fg to #e0def4 and bold true (already bold). That will make unread emails bright white-ish against the surface background.

Actually, let me reconsider. The user said "i especially want the colors for the unread emails to change." This could mean they want unread to be MORE visible or maybe a different color. Since currently unread is #524f67 (very dark/muted), changing to #e0def4 would make them much more visible. Good choice.

Should I also create a `themes/rose-pine-moon` file? It's not referenced and seems redundant. But for completeness and since there's a themes/rose-pine file, maybe I should create one too. However, since it's not used, I'll focus on the styleset. I could mention this to the user.

Wait, I should check what `themes/` is used for in aerc. From aerc docs: "stylesets" define colors of UI elements, and "themes" are color schemes for the message viewer? Actually I recall aerc has both concepts: stylesets are for UI theming, and themes are for... hmm. Let me not worry about it since aerc.conf doesn't reference it.

Now I'll:
1. Create `stylesets/rose-pine-moon` with the moon palette
2. Edit `aerc.conf` line 96 to change `styleset-name="rose-pine"` to `styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"`

Let me create the file.

text: I see the active styleset is `stylesets/rose-pine` (referenced in `aerc.conf`). It currently uses the main Rosé Pine palette, and unread emails are styled with a very muted `#524f67` foreground. I’ll create a new `rose-pine-moon` styleset and switch `aerc.conf` to use it, making unread messages much more visible.

write

content:
# vim: filetype=dosini

# Rosé Pine Moon Theme for Aerc
# All natural pine, faux fur and a bit of soho vibes for the classy minimalist
# Save as ~/.config/aerc/stylesets/rose-pine-moon

# Base styling
default.fg=#9ccfd8
default.bg=#232136

success.fg=#3e8fb0
error.fg=#eb6f92
warning.fg=#f6c177

title.bg=#2a273f
title.fg=#c4a7e7

header.fg=#c4a7e7

spinner.fg=#6e6a86

part_filename.fg=#f6c177
part_mimetype.fg=#c4a7e7

# Global selection
*.selected.fg=#232136
*.selected.bg=#ea9a97
*.selected.bold=true

# Message list
msglist_default.fg=#9ccfd8
msglist_default.bg=#2a273f
msglist_unread.fg=#e0def4
msglist_unread.bold=true
msglist_read.fg=#6e6a86
msglist_flagged.fg=#f6c177
msglist_flagged.bold=true
msglist_deleted.bg=#eb6f92
msglist_deleted.fg=#232136
msglist_deleted.bold=true
msglist_marked.fg=#232136
msglist_marked.bg=#3e8fb0
msglist_marked.bold=true

# Status bar
statusline_*.bold=true
statusline_*.fg=#232136
statusline_default.fg=#9ccfd8
statusline_default.bg=#232136
statusline_error.bg=#eb6f92
statusline_success.bg=#3e8fb0

# Completion
completion_default.fg=#9ccfd8
completion_default.bg=#2a273f
completion_gutter.bg=#2a273f
completion_description.bg=#2a273f

# Scrollbars
*_pill.fg=#232136
*_pill.bg=#6e6a86

# Border
border.fg=#232136
border.bg=#232136

# Tab
tab.bg=#232136
tab.selected.fg=#ea9a97
tab.selected.bg=#232136
tab.selected.bold=true

[viewer]
url.fg=#c4a7e7
url.underline=true
header.bold=true
signature.dim=true
diff_meta.bold=true
diff_chunk.fg=#c4a7e7
diff_chunk_func.fg=#c4a7e7
diff_chunk_func.bold=true
diff_add.fg=#44415a
diff_del.fg=#eb6f92
quote_*.fg=#908caa
quote_1.fg=#2a283e


toolName: write

text: Successfully wrote 1618 bytes to /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/stylesets/rose-pine-moon


thinking: Now I need to update aerc.conf line 96. Let me read that section to be precise.


text:
#
# Default: flags:4,name<20%,subject,date>=
index-columns=flags:4,name<35%,subject,date>=
column-name={{if match .Folder "(?i)Sent|Gesendet"}}{{index (.To | persons) 0}}{{else}}{{index (.From | persons) 0}}{{end}}
border-char-vertical="│"
border-char-horizontal="─"
styleset-name="rose-pine"
threading-enabled=true

#
# Each name in index-columns must have a corresponding column-$name setting.
# All column-$name settings accept golang text/template syntax. See
# aerc-templates(7) for available template attributes and functions.
#
# Here are some examples to show the To field instead of the From field for

[783 more lines in file. Use offset=105 to continue.]


thinking: I need to change `styleset-name="rose-pine"` to `styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"`.

edit

newText: styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"

oldText: styleset-name="rose-pine"


toolName: edit

text: Successfully replaced 1 block(s) in /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf.

diff:
     ...
  92 index-columns=flags:4,name<35%,subject,date>=
  93 column-name={{if match .Folder "(?i)Sent|Gesendet"}}{{index (.To | persons) 0}}{{else}}{{index (.From | persons) 0}}{{end}}
  94 border-char-vertical="│"
  95 border-char-horizontal="─"
- 96 styleset-name="rose-pine"
+ 96 styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"
  97 threading-enabled=true
  98
  99 #
 100 # Each name in index-columns must have a corresponding column-$name setting.
     ...

patch:
--- /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf
+++ /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@
 index-columns=flags:4,name<35%,subject,date>=
 column-name={{if match .Folder "(?i)Sent|Gesendet"}}{{index (.To | persons) 0}}{{else}}{{index (.From | persons) 0}}{{end}}
 border-char-vertical="│"
 border-char-horizontal="─"
-styleset-name="rose-pine"
+styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"
 threading-enabled=true

 #
 # Each name in index-columns must have a corresponding column-$name setting.


thinking:
Now I should verify the changes. There are no build/test commands for aerc config besides maybe checking that aerc can load it. I can't really test aerc UI here. But I can verify the file content and check that the reference matches. Also check permissions on accounts.conf? The lint says accounts.conf must be 0600. But I didn't touch it. I should check git diff maybe.

Let me verify the diff and file contents.

bash

command: cd /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc && git diff -- aerc.conf stylesets/rose-pine-moon

command: stat -c '%a %n' /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/accounts.conf


text:
diff --git a/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf b/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf
index fc82445..0cf2dbf 100644
--- a/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf
+++ b/aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ index-columns=flags:4,name<35%,subject,date>=
 column-name={{if match .Folder "(?i)Sent|Gesendet"}}{{index (.To | persons) 0}}{{else}}{{index (.From | persons) 0}}{{end}}
 border-char-vertical="│"
 border-char-horizontal="─"
-styleset-name="rose-pine"
+styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"
 threading-enabled=true

 #


text: 600 /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc/.config/aerc/accounts.conf


thinking: Good. The git diff shows only aerc.conf changed (the new file might not be tracked yet). Let me also verify the new styleset file content is correct and check git status.

command: cd /home/liph/dotfiles/aerc && git status


text:
On branch main
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.

Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
	modified:   .config/aerc/aerc.conf
	modified:   ../pi/.pi/agent/models.json
	modified:   ../pi/.pi/agent/settings.json
	modified:   ../pi/.pi/context-mode/content/aa673b1056f331f7.db
	modified:   ../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/aa673b1056f331f7.db
	modified:   ../tmux/.tmux.conf

Untracked files:
  (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
	../.crew/
	.config/aerc/stylesets/rose-pine-moon
	aerc/
	../pi/.pi/agent/.pi-subagents/
	../pi/.pi/agent/agents/
	../pi/.pi/agent/chains/
	../pi/.pi/agent/extensions/
	../pi/.pi/agent/profiles/
	../pi/.pi/agent/prompts/
	../pi/.pi/agent/run-history.jsonl
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home--/
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph--/2026-07-04T11-21-16-839Z_019f2cdc-8327-7880-9af2-8270956e40b6.jsonl
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph--/2026-07-04T11-33-18-202Z_019f2ce7-84fa-7ba8-ac85-a2c84ea9315e.jsonl
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph-dotfiles-aerc-.config-aerc--/
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph-dotfiles-pi-.pi-agent--/
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph-dotfiles-pi-.pi-agent-agents--/
	../pi/.pi/agent/sessions/--home-liph-dotfiles-pi-.pi-agent-prompts--/
	../pi/.pi/agent/themes/
	../pi/.pi/agent/trust.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/content/2cc974af6afc822c.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/0b552d378e09330e.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/0b552d378e09330e.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/0b552d378e09330e.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/12c859f108b03852.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/12c859f108b03852.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/12c859f108b03852.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/2cc974af6afc822c.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/2cc974af6afc822c.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/2cc974af6afc822c.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/3ea71be6c83c47ea.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/3ea71be6c83c47ea.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/3ea71be6c83c47ea.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/aa673b1056f331f7.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/aa673b1056f331f7.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/d31232b17918166f.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/d31232b17918166f.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/d31232b17918166f.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/e55f89dbbbbeb520.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/e55f89dbbbbeb520.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/e55f89dbbbbeb520.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/f05bb7382a9480de.db
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/f05bb7382a9480de.db-shm
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/f05bb7382a9480de.db-wal
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1000161.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-1003777.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-100764.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-115478.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-172198.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-207613.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-239205.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-252920.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-36740.json
	../pi/.pi/context-mode/sessions/stats-pid-39264.json
	../pi/.pi/extensions/
	../pi/.pi/teams/

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")


thinking:
The new file is untracked and aerc.conf is modified. The other modified files are unrelated (pi, tmux). I should only add the aerc changes.

Should I commit? The orchestration skill says commit after green phase. But this is a simple direct change. The user didn't ask me to commit. I should ask? Or just present the diff and offer to commit. Actually, since it's a config change in a dotfiles repo, it makes sense to commit. But there are unrelated changes in the working tree. I should stage only the relevant files. Let me ask the user if they want me to commit, or I can just leave it staged.

Actually, the general instruction says "be concise". I'll present the changes and offer to commit if desired. But maybe I should just do it since it's a natural part of the task? Hmm, but the git status shows other modified files I shouldn't touch. Staging only aerc files is fine. But committing might not be desired without user approval. I'll mention it.

Wait, I should also consider: did I miss updating `themes/rose-pine`? There's a themes/rose-pine file identical to the old styleset. Since the user asked for colorscheme change and aerc.conf only references styleset, I think only styleset matters. But if they use aerc's theme for message body display, they might want that too. However, aerc themes are for `color` syntax highlighting? Let me not over-engineer.

Actually, I just realized: I could also leave the old `rose-pine` styleset untouched and create `rose-pine-moon`. That's what I did. Good.

Now let me verify the unread color change is correct by reading the new file.


text:
aerc.conf  [modified in git]
 96: styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"
 316: #styleset-name=default

stylesets/rose-pine-moon  [untracked in git]
 33: msglist_unread.fg=#e0def4
 34: msglist_unread.bold=true

stylesets/gruvbox-dark
 22: msglist_unread.bold=true
 23: msglist_unread.fg=#d8a657
 24: msglist_unread.selected.bg=#ebdbb2
 25: msglist_unread.selected.fg=#282828

aerc.conf.bak
 96: styleset-name="gruvbox-dark"
 316: #styleset-name=default

stylesets/rose-pine
 33: msglist_unread.fg=#524f67
 34: msglist_unread.bold=true

themes/rose-pine
 33: msglist_unread.fg=#524f67
 34: msglist_unread.bold=true


thinking:
Looks good. The unread color changed from `#524f67` to `#e0def4` (bright text) and bold remains. The styleset is now rose-pine-moon.

I should present the summary and optionally commit. I'll be concise.

text:
Done. I created `stylesets/rose-pine-moon` and switched `aerc.conf` to use it.

Key change for unread emails:
- Old (`rose-pine`): `msglist_unread.fg=#524f67` — very muted, hard to see
- New (`rose-pine-moon`): `msglist_unread.fg=#e0def4` — bright Moon text color, still `bold=true`

The rest of the palette was remapped to the Rosé Pine Moon colors (`#232136` base, `#2a273f` surface, `#ea9a97` rose, `#3e8fb0` pine, etc.).

Files changed:
- `aerc/.config/aerc/aerc.conf` — `styleset-name="rose-pine-moon"`
- `aerc/.config/aerc/stylesets/rose-pine-moon` — new styleset

Want me to `git add` and commit just these two aerc files?

stopReason: stop


text: thanks alot better


thinking:
The user said "thanks alot better". I think they mean "thanks a lot, [it looks/works] better" - they are happy with the change. The context-mode active message is just informing about tools.

I should acknowledge their thanks briefly. The change has already been made. I don't think they want me to do anything else. Since they thanked me, a short friendly response is appropriate. I should not over-explain or ask unnecessary questions.

Should I commit the changes? They said "thanks alot better" which sounds like approval. Maybe I should offer to commit or just acknowledge. Since earlier I asked "Want me to git add and commit just these two aerc files?" and they responded with thanks, maybe they are satisfied but didn't explicitly say commit.

I think the safest response is: acknowledge, mention it's ready to use, and ask if they want me to commit it or if they'll handle that themselves. Or just say "You're welcome — glad it looks better. The styleset change is in place; just reload aerc (or restart it) to pick it up." That's helpful and not pushy.

Actually, given they said "thanks alot better", I'll respond warmly and concisely.

text: You’re welcome — glad it reads better now. The `rose-pine-moon` styleset is in place and unread emails should pop clearly. Just restart/reload `aerc` to pick up the new styleset.